Such is the context that made the apparent letter from SCB-HK come with the following conclusion that has caused uproar among those who are against the PAC’s submission in the parliament that led to an allegedly more or less similar parliamentary resolution: “The Bank has proposed to your legal advisers that the Government of Tanzania immediately consider Nationalisation of IPTL. This would be with the support of the Bank and with the express objective of implementing the Agreed Plan…. If Nationalisation were to be agreed upon and implemented…. The whole process could be conducted through the Tanzanian Parliament. There would be no need to involve the courts....”
Labda tujiulize kwa nini Chaupele awe TANESCO na sio Serikali au Wizara ya Nishati na Madini? Tukiidadisi Taarifa ya CAG tutaona kuwa kwa kiasi kikubwa kwenye suala la akaunti ya Escrow ya Tegeta, TANESCO ndiye huyo huyo Wizara ya Nishati na Madini pia ndiye huyo huyo Serikali hivyo wote ni Chaupele tu. Tuanze na nukuu hii iliyopo ukurasa wa 11: “Kwa mujibu wa kipengele Na.1.1 na Na 7.1 cha Makubaliano ya Escrow Benki Kuu ya Tanzania (BoT) ilikubali kuwa wakala wa akaunti ya Escrow ambayo ilifunguliwa kufuatia makubaliano baina ya Serikali ya Tanzania kupitia Wizara ya Nishati na Madini na Kampuni ya IPTL yaliyofikiwa tarehe 5 Julai, 2006.”