In other words, no one – not even PLI in BVI or PAP in TEGETA – could represent MECHMAR. This Court Order also affirmed that these Liquidators “have the power, authority and ability” to “act for, represent and conduct or direct the affairs of” MECHMAR; “carry on legal proceedings in the name of and the business of” MECHMAR “so far as may be necessary for a beneficial winding-up” and to “take action to preserve and recover assets of” MECHMAR.
Udadisi wa kina wa mikopo na madeni hayo unaweza kutusaidia kuelewa kwa nini, kwa mujibu wa CAG, wanasheria walioishauri TANESCO walitofautiana kuhusu kiwango ambacho kiliwekezwa na IPTL. Kampuni moja ya wanasheria iliona hivi: “Mapendekezo ya Mkono & Co. Advocates katika kipengele cha 7 na 8 katika taarifa yake kwa Bodi aliishauri TANESCO kuwataka IPTL kufanya marekebisho ya gharama za uwekezaji (Capacity Charges) kwa kuzingatia mtaji wa Shilingi 50,000 na kuanzisha madai dhidi ya IPTL ili kurejesha fedha zilizolipwa zaidi kutokana na kutumika kwa mtaji wa Dola za Kimarekani Milioni 38.16 katika ukokotoaji wa tozo za uwekezaji isivyo sahihi.