As critics of PAC’s report have queried in regard to SCB-HK, if it is indeed, what business did he/they have with an alleged ‘tapeli’ (i.e. ‘crook’)? Among other things that had to be done at Completion, it is noted in the said MoA, PAP shall: “transfer the Settlement to SCB”; “provide “know your client” evidence in regard to” PAP “satisfactory to SCB”; “provide evidence satisfactory of the consent of IPTL to the assignment of the Loan to” PAP. The remaining question is: Did that ever happen?
Kwa mantiki hii ya ‘ubinaadamu’, inashauriwa tusimhukumu, anayesemekana ukurugenzi wake ulileta tija na ufanisi TANESCO kuliko wa wengine, kwa sababu tu aliwahi kuhusishwa pamoja na Chenge kwenye kashfa ya Rada badala yake tumpongeze hasa ukizingatia Taarifa ya CAG imemuandika hivi: “Katika vipindi tofauti mwaka 2008, aliyekuwa Mkurugenzi Mtendaji wa TANESCO, Dr. ldrisa Rashid alifanya mawasiliano mbalimbali na IPTL kuhusiana na madai ya TANESCO kwa IPTL yaliyotokana na kutozwa zaidi kiwango cha tozo ya uwekezaji (capacity charges)”.