The coverage is emarkable, embracing logic, literature, history, myth, science, philosophy, jurisprudence, political theory, and theology – interspersed throughout with the wit and rapier thrusts of a barrister at home in adversarial contexts. Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus, having demonstrated the limits of any non-transcendental attempt to understand the world, ended with the proposition, “Of that which one cannot speak, one must remain silent.” Montgomery, after setting forth in depth the overwhelming case for the very transcendental revelation for which Wittgenstein longed but never found, concludes: “Whereof one can speak, thereof one must not be silent.” The Tractatus Logico-Theologicus purports to break new ground apologetically, as did the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus epistemologically.
Mtazamo huu mbadala unasisitiza mitazamo ya kimaadili ya Wagalatia, ukitaka kuthibitisha kuwa Waraka kwa Wagalatia haupingani tu na washika sheria bali pia na kundi la pili la wapinzani wa Paulo, ambao walipingana kabisa na Agano la Kale na Sheria, na waliishi maisha ya zinaa kwa jina la uhuru wa Ukristo, kipekee, mtazamo uliwekwa na Komentari ya Wilhelm Lutgert ya Mwaka 1919. Paulo anapambana dhidi ya kutanguliwa kwa Sheria ya Agano la Kale na vilevile dhidi ya kuitumia Sheria hii kama njia ya wokovu badala ya neema ya Mungu.