For instance, I continue to wonder why the name of then TANESCO lawyer, Godwin Simba Ngwilimi, who (apparently) took an oath in regard to what IPTL (apparently) owed TANESCO does not appear among the 33 people appearing in Annex 1 who were called for a debate/discussion with CAG during the audit. If the chair of the board of TANESCO, who is recorded in the CAG report as stressing that they were not aware of that oath, is among the 33, why not the lawyer who was so central in the Escrow debate between the chair of PAC and the Minister of MEM?
Pia alithibitisha kushiriki kikao cha tarehe 26 Novemba 2013 kilichoitishwa na Gavana.” Sasa ikawaje tena siku tatu baadaye yanatokea haya yafuatayo yaliyomfanya hata ndugu Angelo aonekane walau akiliishi jina lake lenye maana ya ‘malaika’ kwa kuomba muongozo wa kisheria kutoka kwa wenzake wa BOT: “Baada ya kupokea taarifa ya Stanbic tarehe 28 Novemba, 2013, Bw. Harbinder Singh Sethi alimjulisha Gavana Prof. Benno Ndulu kuwa afanye malipo husika kupitia akaunti za PAP…zilizofunguliwa tarehe 28 Novemba 2013”?