He explained that the miner could not be the proprietor of the mine, as the weaver is of his loom, and he said that he preferred sharing in the benefits, the interested worker becoming the child of the house.
Il expliquait que la mine ne pouvait etre la propriété du mineur, comme le métier est celle du tisserand, et il disait préférer la participation aux bénéfices, l'ouvrier intéressé, devenu l'enfant de la maison.