His delegation had asked that the seventh preambular paragraph of the draft resolution should read, “Notes the fact that acts of enforced disappearance could come within the competence of the Court,” whereas the agreed wording implied that all acts of enforced disappearance, rather than only some instances of such acts, came within the competence of the Court.
El orador recuerda que su delegación había pedido que el párrafo séptimo del preámbulo del proyecto de resolución fuera el siguiente: “Toma nota del hecho de que los actos de desapariciones forzadas podrían ser competencia de la Corte”.