Since the plaintiff had pointed out to the defendant that the invoice had been issued on request by its Indian parent company, the defendant was rightfully under the impression that the Indian parent company, and not the plaintiff, was its contractual partner.
Habida cuenta de que el demandante señaló al demandado que la factura había sido emitida a petición de su empresa matriz india, el demandado pudo legítimamente suponer que su vínculo contractual no era con el demandante sino con su empresa matriz india.