The Committee observes, however, that the author has provided no details as to the reasons the successful judge was appointed beyond a general allegation of nepotism, as to why his candidacy was superior in relevant respects or to any of the further matters which the Committee would be required to consider before it could resolve such a claim.
El Comité observa, sin embargo, que el autor no facilitó ningún detalle de los motivos por los que se nombró al otro juez, aparte de denunciar en general que hubo nepotismo, de las razones por las que su candidatura era superior en aspectos relevantes, ni de los otros asuntos que el Comité tendría que examinar para poder resolver esta reclamación.