He alleges, with reference to the Committee's jurisprudence, that he has not been afforded an effective remedy to challenge his expulsion and that there are no compelling reasons of national security to deprive him of such a remedy.
Con referencia a la jurisprudencia del Comité, afirma que no dispuso de un recurso efectivo para impugnar su expulsión y que no hay razones imperiosas de seguridad nacional para privarle de ese recurso.