The author contends that the trial judge's approach was biased against him on account of his gender, substituted his own evaluation of the medical evidence for that of the expert involved, and failed to respect the presumption of innocence.
El autor afirma que el planteamiento del juez sentenciador se basaba en prejuicios contra él debido a su género, que ignoró el dictamen pericial para aplicar su propio criterio y que no respetó la presunción de inocencia.