In the Committee's view, the State party has not shown that there is any likelihood that the Supreme Court would come to any other decision if the question were again to arise before it, and thus the remedy invoked by the State party must be regarded, on the basis of settled jurisprudence, as not being effective.
En opinión del Comité, el Estado Parte no ha demostrado que exista alguna probabilidad de que el Tribunal Supremo adopte una decisión distinta si se le volviera a plantear el asunto, y por lo tanto debe considerarse, sobre la base de la jurisprudencia establecida, que el recurso invocado por el Estado Parte no es efectivo.