Further, the court found that the dispute as to whether monies had been wrongfully taken by the defendants from the second plaintiff was plainly within the scope of the arbitration agreement (MAL 7(1)).
Además, el Tribunal falló que la disputa sobre si los demandados habían percibido incorrectamente dinero del segundo demandante entraba claramente en el ámbito del acuerdo de arbitraje (LMA 7 1)).