However, the petitioner sought to challenge this finding in the Supreme Court on the basis that it was made on ex-parte evidence and any purported notices, which the Commission alleged to have sent to the petitioner, had not in fact been received by him.
El demandante trató, no obstante, de impugnar estas conclusiones ante la Corte Suprema por considerar que estaban basadas en pruebas de una sola parte y no haber recibido en realidad ninguna pretendida notificación que presuntamente le había enviado la Comisión.