It was stated that for the same reasons outlined in respect of subparagraph (a)(i), it was not necessary to expressly introduce language on the burden of proof because it was apparent that it was for the party against whom the interim measure was sought to show that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral tribunal.
Se señaló que por las mismas razones aducidas con respecto al inciso i) del apartado a), no era necesario agregar palabras explícitas sobre la carga de la prueba, puesto que era evidente que la parte contra la que se solicitaba la medida cautelar era la que debía demostrar que no se le notificó debidamente el nombramiento del árbitro o del tribunal arbitral.