The Panel issued a procedural order requesting the claimant to provide additional evidence, including Swiss customs documents pertaining to the export of the ten items from Geneva to Kuwait, which the claimant''s husband claimed to have completed when he allegedly took the items to Kuwait in Notwithstanding the Panel''s request, tThe claimant did not provide theany customs or other acceptable documents, however, and made no apparent effort to obtain them from the Swiss authorities Having considered the claimant''s evidence pertaining to these ten items, the Panel concludes that the claimant has failed to prove that she owned the items The Panel also concludes that the claimant has failed to prove that the items were located in Kuwait at the time of Iraq''s invasion and occupation of Kuwait and, therefore, that they were lost as a direct result thereofof the invasion and occupation With respect to the second group of jewellery items, the claimant provided invoices relating to all of the items, as well as letters of credit and bank advices.
Después de examinar las pruebas presentadas por la reclamante con respecto a estas diez piezas, el Grupo llega a la conclusión de que la reclamante no ha demostrado que fuese su propietaria. El Grupo también llega a la conclusión de que la reclamante no ha demostrado que las piezas se encontrasen en Kuwait en el momento de la invasión y ocupación de Kuwait por el Iraq y, por lo tanto, que se hubiesen perdido como resultado directo de esta invasión.