He explained that to “mitigate a situation which was both draconian and lacking in precedents”, he proposed to establish civil liability as a primary channel and supplement it with the liability of the State, or replace the liable private parties by State liability if the former could not be identified or located.
Explicó que, para “mitigar una situación tan draconiana como menesterosa en precedentes”, proponía que se adoptase la responsabilidad civil como responsabilidad primaria y que se la complementase con la responsabilidad del Estado, o que se sustituyese la responsabilidad de los particulares por la responsabilidad de los Estados si no se pudiera identificar o localizar a los primeros.