(20) وتعرب اللجنة عن قلقها إزاء التصريحات العلنية التي أدلى بها عدد من الشخصيات الإسرائيلية البارزة بشأن العرب، وهي تصريحات يمكن أن تشكل دعوة إلى الكراهية العنصرية والدينية، مما يمثل تحريضاً على التمييز والعداء والعنف.
A “claim” is, therefore, not just an allegation, but an allegation supported by substantiating material. In cases where the Committee finds that the author has failed to substantiate a claim for purposes of admissibility, the Committee has held the communication inadmissible, in accordance with rule 90 (b) of its rules of procedure. Claims have been declared inadmissible for lack of substantiation in cases Nos. 726/1996 (Zheludkov v. Ukraine), 743/1997 (Truong v. Canada), 757/1997 (Pezoldova v. The Czech Republic), 781/1997 (Aliev v. Ukraine), 820/1998 (Rajan v. New Zealand), 836/1998 (Gelazauskas v. Lithuania), 837/1998 (Kolanowski v. Poland), 852/1999 (Borisenko v. Hungary), 864/1999 (Ruiz Agudo v. Spain), 876/1999 (Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia), 886/1999 (Bondarenko v. Belarus), 887/1999 (Lyashkevich v. Belarus), 890/1999 (Krausser v. Australia), 908/2000 (Evans v. Trinidad and Tobago), 942/2000 (Jonassen v. Norway), 953/2000 (Zündel v. Canada), 980/2001 (Hussain v. Mauritius), 984/2001 (Shukuru Juma v. Australia), 987/2001 (Gombert v. France), 1001/2001 (Strik v. The Netherlands), 1013/2001 (Boboli v. Spain), 1014/2001 (Baban et al. v. Australia), 1020/2001 (Pasini v. Australia), 1021/2002 (Hiro Balani v. Spain), 1049/2002 (Van Puyvelde v. France), 1082/2002 (De Clippele v. Belgium), 1088/2002 (Veriter v. France), 1091/2002 (Perera v. Sri Lanka), 1114/2002 (Kavanagh v. Ireland) and 1142/2002 (Van Grinsven v. The Netherlands). Individual opinions were appended to the Committee's Views in respect of case No. 942/2000 (Jonassen v. Norway) on the issue of non-substantiation. In cases Nos. 886/1999 (Bondarenko v. Belarus) and 887/1999 (Lyashkevich v. Belarus), with regard to a claim that the conviction of the author was not based on clear evidence, the Committee