She did not, however, understand why, in order to take advantage of two weeks of unpaid leave, the child's father had to declare that he would “assume or intend to assume the care of the child” (written reply to question 13 in the list of issues), which seemed self-evident.
Par contre, elle ne comprend pas que pour bénéficier d'un congé sans solde de deux semaines, le père de l'enfant doive déclarer «s'occuper ou entendre s'occuper de l'enfant» (réponse écrite à la question no 13 de la liste des points à traiter), ce qui semble aller de soi.