The Panel finds that the claimant's explanation as to how the alleged transactions were frustrated as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait is vague and conclusory, and devoid of the requisite particulars to establish that the losses were directly caused by Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Le Comité considère que ses explications concernant les causes de l'abandon des transactions sont trop vagues pour que l'on puisse imputer directement les pertes à l'invasion et à l'occupation du Koweït par l'Iraq.