The Panel finds that, while the two invoices submitted by Inspekta to SEF are dated after 2 May 1990, the inspection reports provided by Inspekta in support of its claim confirm that the inspections were conducted prior to 2 May 1990.
Le Conseil d'administration a indiqué, au paragraphe 6 de la décision 9 (S/AC.26/1992/9), que les pertes résultant exclusivement de l'embargo sur le commerce et des mesures connexes n'étaient pas indemnisables.