It was also suggested that, if the intention of the Working Group was to cover all three meanings of public policy (being domestic public policy, public policy forming part of the international private law and true public policy of a transnational character as discussed earlier (see para. 38), it would be unnecessarily restrictive to refer to the public policy “of this State”.
On a aussi fait valoir que si l'intention du Groupe de travail était de viser l'ordre public dans ses trois acceptions (l'ordre public interne, l'ordre public faisant partie du droit international privé et l'ordre public à caractère vraiment transnational (voir par. 38), parler de l'ordre public “du présent État” serait trop restrictif.