Riho küsimusele on ka CEMI koostamisel vastus pakutud:  http://www.surrey.ac.uk/qe/pdfs/mcfadden_JCS2002b.pdf  .  Artificially generated EM fields, such as the EM fields that communicate radio and TV signals, are only capable of communicating the information encoded and transmitted within their fields. Consider constructing a supercomputer with conventional electronic architecture but  with the complexity of the human brain and capable of communicating. Most AI researchers claim that consciousness would spontaneously emerge in such a system. I would argue instead that any AI based on digital circuitry will lack consciousness since it will lack the influence of a field capable of encoding whole concepts.  .  http://www.surrey.ac.uk/qe/pdfs/cemi_theory_paper.pdf  .  In the cemi field  theory, the phenomenon we call 'free will' is our subjective experience of the influence of the cemi field on motor neurones. This influence contrasts with our unconscious (or unwilled) actions that lack that influence. In the cemi field theory, we are not simply automatons that happen to be aware of our actions. All of the robot's actions would be unconscious - it would be an automaton without a conscious 'will'. Since, in the cemi field theory, a conscious being is aware of the information contained within  the cemi field, qualia - the subjective feel of particular mind states - must correspond to particular configurations of the cemi field. A robotic brain could therefore be constructed that is functionally equivalent to a human brain that would experience subjective qualia, if it incorporated a cemi field.