"

Again, I am talking about what GG says they are, by their claims, not what other people say they are. And that Boston Globe article section that is key is this ""Backers of the GamerGate movement say the behavior of a few extremists is being used to smear their entire movement. “You can’t say that all people who support GamerGate hate women, just because one person in GamerGate might really hate women,” said PAX East attendee Andrew Sampson, a 20-year-old software developer from Atlanta. Sampson insisted GamerGate isn’t a war on women, but on corruption and dishonesty in video game journalism. “Video game journalists for the longest time have been colluding together,” said Sampson. “Basically taking bribes, taking offers to publish positive reviews.”"". That's completely fair to use to explain the self-stated goals. To say ""No, we can't use them because non-GG say the are something else"" is a violation of objectivity and impartialness.  (t) 

"