Yes, I remeber you warmly.  Did the personal attack against you, in the case you mention, involve a body part of yours having been selected for scurrilous comment, as is the case above?  Do you not realise that anything of that sort is a criminal matter in ordinary life (a person can go to jail in the United States for something that)?  I do question motives behind actions of Wikipedia administrators where I do not see official policies and guidelines supporting them; and I expect User:Bishonen’s answers: those can be given, I may be proven wrong, and the matter might end with an apology.  There should be more questioning, not less, however, if problems like those you yourself had suffered are to be rectified systemically.  There is a world of difference between, on the one hand, a personal attack, such as might involve a reference to the victim’s body, and, on the other hand, an attack on ABUSE of authority or an attack on the wrongfulness of an action.  One thing that User:Bishonen and User:Charles Matthews simply have NO right to do is continuously to cyber-stalk me with intent to harass with unexplained reverts, etc., and when questioned refuse to engage.  Interlocutors might be chosen at liberty when he or she opens the door of his or her house: here such liberty does not exist, and questions from all quarters must be answered as a matter of official policy.  Thank you for writing to me in what obviously are very difficult times.  — Prof02