"
 To quote Dilger At least another 17 citations in Wikipedia's article are used to attack the legitimacy of the jury that awarded Apple damages. Browbeating the jury's reputation in a passive voice, Wikipedia states that ""the jury's decision was criticized for being Apple-friendly possibly leading to increased costs for Android smartphone users,"" while questioning the jury's impartiality and how quickly it reached its verdict. And while the article emphasizes that the jury awarded Samsung ""zero damages in its counter suit,"" it doesn't cite any sources examining why the jury tossed out all of Samsung's patent claims or why ""the jury decided after the first day of deliberations that it believed Samsung was in the wrong."" It just portrays that decision as being rash and unfair. Clearly Dilger is biased so the question is he lying? Or exaggerating? Or just so biased he is blinkered by his view and can't read a fair article? As you say this article should just be about the litigation not which multinational was right or wrong?   "