Status and Advice  

As reviewing administrator, I  deleted the article, not necessarily because of no indication of importance, but because it was a purely promotional c.v.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.   
It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release list everything a person does; write in paragraph format about the key points of the education and career. 

Be aware you will need to write the articles to Wikipedia  style; a good place to start learning it  is    our guide to writing Wikipedia articles .  

First, give the basic informationthe source should be the CV birthplace and date, degrees, previous positions. If there are published books, list them in formal bibliographic style. List the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science. Include major national level offices and awards, but not minor ones. Be sure to list editorships (but not mere editorial board membership) we consider it very important, and you should add it to the articles for the relevant journals also, with a link to the bio.  

It is not necessary to cite the basic information in detail to other than the official CV.  For any part you quote directly from a published bio, include quotation marks and a reference.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia  is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest   but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. 

If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  '''''' ( talk )