You still misunderstand. What I know or not is irrelevant. What you know or not is irrelevnat. All content must be cited to a reliable source. WoRMS is generally considered a reliable source, and occasional errors do not negate that. If we had a further source contradicting it, or explaining the error, then we could cite that, and the error would be removed. No such alternative has been presented, either here or on the under-sourced Wikispecies page. You must learn that verifiability is everything here. It is one of the core content policies on which Wikipedia is founded. Without that, we have nothing. There are no reliable sources listed here claiming that those genera don't exist, and one claiming that they do. We have no choice but to report that. By all means publish your research on generic names in Munididae, but until it's published, we can't cite it.