Please forgive and correct the mistake if I am wrong but do you have a personal connection with Wikiseek?

The reason I ask is the laser-like focus of your edits:
    * 19:19, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Wikiseek  (top)
    * 19:18, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Wikiseek (Reworded the biased warning about missing articles.)
    * 18:44, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Search engine (Added Wikiseek back to the list) (top)
    * 18:49, 10 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m Wikiseek (added categories)
    * 18:45, 10 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Search engine (Added Wikiseek to the chart)
    * 00:21, 7 June 2006 (hist) (diff) User:Billvision (Bill Sutherland's bio) (top)

You recently reverted my (factual edits) pointing out the shortcomings of Wikiseek. Are you able to persuade us of your neutral point of view?

I intend to reinstate my factual comments as to examples of failing searches. Please would you be so kind as to discuss any proposed excision of my examples in the Discussion page for the Wikisearch article BEFORE you revert again?