"

 Wikipedia IS evil 

It is host to the same big political groupthink game that goes on in
all of the rest of civilization. It is a battleground for propaganda warfare, a lawless game in which anything can be said as long as its in ""neutral"" language even if its a propagandists lie, and even if it exists only to dispute a known fact. It is a place notable mostly for what it conspicuously lacks. There are in general thousands of articles which tell us about as much as a High Schooler might, and which then devolve into factoids and rhetoric. The expertise of depth
knowledge is missing. No expert would submit themselves to a situation of patent pack psychology informational riot. Wikipedia is
Evil. And You, Jimbo Wales, are the guy who created it. Maybe you should try some Formal Logic in the mix. Maybe this ""Randian"" Environment could use some controls on its chaos vectors. Maybe even
a realistic and functional methodology for dealing with abuse might be in order. 

Nice graphic box at the top of the page says to go post at the admin
desk,. Funny, i tried that, and got less than no result. Abusiveness is rampant and the organization is headless. I can tell Wikipedia in
fifty places what its problems are and how to solve them, but wikipedias nose is in the air, and the God king doesn't seem to read
his talk page. What you have here isn't an encyclopedia, and in pretending, all that it offers a legitamate participant over the long term is abuse. The admin desk won't help you if you are being attacked and baited with ad hominems; they don't even know what one is. They aren't required to pick up any education to become admins;
they come with the standard prole ""opinion"" fully intact, and no knowledge to back anything up. 

Good luck with your evil science social sciences project.
Let me know if you want any help to fix it.
 "