"==Aircraft lists==
Hi Petebutt and thanks for all the hard work you're putting into expanding these lists. However, you're also causing quite a bit of chaos through, I think, unfamiliarity with how Wikilinks work.

To make a long story short, whatever goes inside the double-square brackets - [[ and ]] must be the name of the actual page that you're pointing to; if not, problems can occur. 

For example, in your recent edits to the Lockheed part of the list, you removed ""Lockheed"" from some of the entries. This means that F-4 points to the Phantom II and U-2 points to a disambiguation page. If you want the link to appear different on the screen from the actual page name, we use what's called a ""pipe""; for example - [[Lockheed U-2|U-2]] will appear as ""U-2"" on the page, but take you to the Lockheed U-2 article (try it! - U-2).

Hope this helps! You might also like to check out WP:AIR, the WikiProject that exists to co-ordinate Wikipedia's aircraft content. Cheers   

On that subject-  I've just rolled back your last text dump - it's full of broken links, bad formatting, and inconsistencies both within itself and with these lists in general. Please take some time to try and understand how wikilinks work and how these lists are structured. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page   

 Caudron C.230 

Hi again - apologies are unnecessary - we were all new here once! 

Thanks for the article on the Caudron C.230 - I've moved it across into the main part of the encyclopedia (you'd actually placed it on your ""userpage"" - a page where contributors to Wikipedia may choose to introduce themselves, saying as much or as little about themselves as they want.) You can read more about userpages here, and if you want to create one, just click on your name (in red) that you see at the top centre of your screen. 

To create a new article in the main body of the encyclopedia, either click on a red link in an existing article or list, or put the name of the topic into the ""search"" box at the left-hand side of the screen and click ""go"". 

And again, if I can be of any help, please let me know on my talk page.   

 Various stuff 

Hi again - you're really getting the hang of things now. I'll continue to offer some unsolicited advice - if I'm bombarding you too much, please feel free to tell me to get lost! )

I took the liberty of moving your ""under construction"" article from your userpage to User:Petebutt/Sandbox, which is the conventional spot to store such things.

A few notes from your recent contributions - these are all really formatting ""nits"" (with perhaps the exception of the links) - please take them in a spirit of friendly encouragement and as a ""fast track"" towards learning Wikipedia (and WikiProject Aircraft) style.

SectionsIn many articles, you'll see ""hidden"" comments like . These have been left as reminders that if the article ever grows big enough to require splitting into sections, these are the conventional names for these sections (take a look at a major article like F-4 Phantom II as an example, and WikiProject Aircraft: Page content for the guide)
 the section will not become visible until the """" are removed
 in short articles, there's no advantage to using these; it's better to just leave them hidden - remember that we're trying to write encyclopedia articles in connected prose. One-sentence paragraphs (let alone sections) have little value here
 For experimental, one-off prototypes, the ""Operators"" and ""operational history"" sections are meaningless - just leave them out.

ContextYou removed context-giving introductions from a couple of articles. It's extremely important that articles establish context right at the beginning. There are a number of different ways that readers may come across an article; therefore the lead should establish straight away the what-where-when, and that for example, the ""Yakovlev Yak-25 was a prototype fighter aircraft built in the Soviet Union in 1947"". Elaboration can (and should!) follow - but straight away, the reader knows what this article is about, and that this is not a car, washing machine, or something from Star Trek. 
NEW