"

 I find it hard to believe that you would think that there is any consensus on the subject, even less on the terminology. I am not ""revisionist"". I am telling you what happened in the countries conquered by Europeans. ""Mixed"" people in the United States, Canada and South Africa did become ""white"", in many cases. Here is a quote for you: 

[quote]Sociologist and anthropologist Robert Stuckert examined census and fertility data to estimate how many blacks in America had passed as white, and how many whites had African ancestry as a result. His statistical tables showed that during the 1940s, 15,550 light-skinned blacks per year crossed over to live as whites, for a total of about 155,500 for the decade. Based on these figures, he determined that by 1950, some 21% of whites (about 28 million people then) had black ancestry within the last four generations, and he predicted that this number would only grow in the decades to come.[/quote]
(Stuckert, 1958)

Now, the Anglosphere has never been 100% ""white"", and a ""white policy"" has definitely played a huge role in the history of these countries, surely a lot more than in Latin America.Grenzer22  "