"

 Dan56 is bullying contributors 

Why are you guys allowing this one guy to control the page?  He will not allow anything true to be put, only his own opinion.  Metacritic gives the album a 76.  That means ""generally positive.""  That's a very nice review.  Why does Dan56 keep removing that when I add it?  His opinion should not count more than the 14 critics cited.  Please help with fairness.  I understand he loves Aaliya.  On the Nicki Minaj page two days ago, he reversed editors who made positive comments inthe review section of ""Roman Reloaded"" and said this:

By a show of hands (or comments), does this revision to the article's ""critical reception"" section smack of POV content removal (WP:VNT), editorializing (WP:WORDS), and undue weight to minority viewpoints (WP:UNDUE)? Oh, and being neutral in form, considering most of the reviews that the album received were ""mixed"", as verified by Metacritic and The Independent, both of which are cited in the article, yet the editor seems to overlook that (""using metacritic is lazy""?), along with a few other reliable third-party sources (GoogleNews' index of sources, The Huffington Post) Dan56 (talk) 

Why does Metacritic carry weight for every artist except Aaliya?  The album is great.  It got generally positive reviews.  Let's keep things honest folks.
  "