"

 International SOS, revisited 

If you cannot source your edits, they do not satisy our content policies. Good faith can be questioned when facts, especially regarding a commercial organisation which you appear to be involved with, are continually reincluded without sources. And as you admit you were involved in this deal, it would appear you have a conflict of interest. I know you're extremely keen to have this little nugget of information included in Wikipedia, but you have to do it by the rules. If you're claiming that unsourced facts in Wikipedia should be allowed ""because you can just ring someone up and ask"" you've got it wrong. And if you're referring to the warning above as ""false"", it forms part of Wikipedia's warning template structure, hence any discussion about its validity should be brought up at an appropriate talkpage.  talk "