"

 Trivia, last time 

See this edit, in which , who edits little else besides this article, this section, claims that there is consensus on this talk page for this horrible selection of trivia. The trivia here is nothing but insignificant mentions and some other tripe, including an originally-researched claim that it's ""close"" to some location in a 19th-century novel, just to indicate the level of encyclopedic discourse, and what can only be described as a combination of trivia and spam in the link to the SCP Foundation Web Site, whatever it is. I mean, I've seen some trivia in my time, but this beats almost all of them. I'll let it stand so you can see how trivial it is, even though it totally rubs me the wrong way. So here's what I propose: we take care of this once and for all. In the above-linked diff, Kothog claims consensuswell, there isn't. There's a bit of discussion, but nothing like consensus. So I invite every interested party, including previous participants, to settle it. Names I see on this talk page who have discussed this matter include , , , , , , , .   

Proposal
In agreement with Wikipedia practice, common sense, with WP:TRIVIA, with WP:V, and with Wikipedia:""In popular culture"" content, I propose that the trivia section (or whatever it's to be called) will contain only entries that are rigorously verified with reliable secondary sources as to correctness and relevance (just that ""it is mentioned"" isn't enough: it needs to be established that it matters).   "