"::::: How is saying ""At least they are historians and not terrorists"" to be construed as attacking another religion ? Saying someone is an historian is attacking a religion ? I did not know that ""historian"" has any abusive connotations, please correct me if my knowledge of English is wrong and historian is an abuse. I really need to understand how this can be seen as an example of "" Extremist-style one way traffic"". And your equating me with Osama is a personal attack, Please! being an admin and an arbcom admin at that some restraint is expected of you. Cool down Sir and be civil. It is a wind up, and you having warned me of windups should know better. Please do walk the talk.
If you were not so bent in trying to show my faults, you would in the same section  as you have linked to above also find my response to your current accusation, which said it is ""not the number of times Subhash was banned by Blnguyen but the number of times he should have been and  he was let off"". So it would seem that someone who cannot read is busy worrying about the counting ability of another.And this issue was discussed last year, the time to respond was then, at that time you were also asked direct questions by me, which you chose to ignore.
And that an arbcom member is so bent of fighting with a mere editor and besmirching him  must be also a source of great pride for some. I have not commented on your religion or your country, you have on mine. Shows who has  attacked people based on national identities or religion. So that too must make someone very proud.
 Defending a person, or standing up for them does not mean one agrees with every statement that they may have made. Show me where I have defended Bhaisaab's anti religion comments. So you have now made another false claim above that I defend anti semetic speech. By the same generalisation what would you say about an admin not even reacting to an virulent anti Muslim speech made by his protege, even after I posted it on the admin's talk page ? Further that admin's  defending his protege then makes the admin  (by your logic above) a defender of anti Muslim speech!. That  I an editor with no powers is fighting a biased and prejudiced person, misusing his position , is a great source of pride for me.
 Also please do note that since the arbcom elections I have not bothered to be involved with you, till you went about posting details about me;and your attempt to trace my location , to an editor hostile to me. So rather than me bent on besmirching you as you seem to potray, the fact is that my opposing you on the arbcom has got me special attention from you, which is gross abuse of your position. 
 

"