The version I just examined appears to have removed the considerable number of personal attacks and there is a citation that backs up the assertions of criminal charges, so I'm going to restore the article under its correct name and remove the week's worth of protection that I applied to forestall further attacks.  As you will doubtless realize, Wikipedia has to be extremely careful about publishing anything that amounts to criminal libel, and the first two versions of the article I examined were undoubtedly libellous.  Thanks for attempting to work within our boundaries.  talk