"

 Reverting for no reason 

I spent quite some time improving an article that was in a poor state.  Now two people have undone all my work with a click of a button.  You didn't have the courtesy to explain why you reverted it, but you still had the fucking cheek to accuse me of leaving an inaccurate edit summary.  No-one's that stupid so you were plainly just out to provoke me.  Well fucking well done, consider me fucking provoked.  I guess you didn't even bother to look at the changes before you put all that shit back.

Self-arrest refers to various maneuvers employed in mountaineering
It doesn't ""refer"" to that; it is that.  You want to say ""Paris refers to the capital city of France"" or ""Nile refers to a river that flows into the Mediterranean""?
sliding down a snow or ice covered slope arrests (stops) the slide
 You think readers are too stupid to understand what ""arrests"" means in this context?
himself or herself
 You think the single word ""themselves"" is some how better expressed in three words?
and/or ice axe
 You never bothered to read WP:SLASH?
 These potentially life-saving techniques must be practiced frequently in order to maintain proficiency
 This website is called wikipedia, not wikimanual.  But you never bothered to read WP:NOT, did you?

That's just the first five, I made many more, I left the article looking considerably better and more encyclopaedic, but then you came along and fucked it all back up again.  Do you feel proud?  186.9.130.34  "