"
That is a matter of opinion, but with 4 blatantly wrong CSD tags out of 17 - nearly a 25% fail rate - you're not even in the game, let alone the ballpark. You are wielding CSD as a blunt instrument, tagging first and thinking about it later. It needs to be used much more as a surgical instrument. Furthermore, although you removed CSD tags in two cases, even after being told about here on this page, you have not gone back to the user talk pages and apologized and/or removed the CSD tags. No, we aren't discussing an attempt at perfection here; we are discussing competence and civility. You make a big point out of demanding civility from others posting on your talk page, but what you don't understand is that what you are doing is a pretty serious form of incivility. In addition to the CSD taggings, you are picking new articles and adding all sorts of problem tags to them instead of actually building content. Again, I ask you - instead of tagging articles, how about adding content to them? An example of a newly created article I did that with, Django Walker, was listed at DYK. When I first saw it, it was nominated for CSD. We are here to build an encyclopedia. Are you?  |  talk  "