My friend, Bbb23, has forgot that BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense.  Appealing to ad hominem attacks (saying that I have a checkered history in the short time [I have] been here) won't work, either.  What Bbb23 neglected to mention is that the addition DOES NOT tell the entire history of the defendant.  It tells the story of the largest email / cell phone hacking scandal in the history of Hollywood and this country!  Kunis was the victim - along with 50 other celebrities.  Nude pictures and private emails have flooded the internet since then, embarassing countless innocent people, to include Kunis.  She is listed as a victim on a Federal indictment.  The guy who hacked her could have got 60 years in prison (the Govt has asked for 71 months).  And this guy Bbb23 comes along tearing stuff out of the article with no explanation.