" entry. I concede I do not have the strength (patience?) to fight this alone, or even in doubles. Your approach to this issue, as well as 's, are useful in reminding us of the self-evident fact that the information in this online encyclopaedia is only as good as its contributors and editors' input. Avast, ye strudels!-  
More commentary on editors?  Enlightening.  My sympathies for your professed poor imagination. Regards,   
What you perceive as ""commentary on editors"" (i.e. as something ""personal"") is criticism of how specific editors approach, and have approached in the recent past, a specific issue on a specific article. That is exactly what this is all  about and no more, although it'd be understandable if you want to make it abt something else. Because what you are doing is an attempt to deflect the argument, rather than address it. And the argument is solely about restoring some semblance of encyclopaedic insight into a biography article, 's attempt to do so, and the duo once again blanketing of anything remotely besmirching the profile of the article's subject. Talk about being ""passionate!"" In case you feel like being on point, again, sometime in the future, I'd advice you to start by enlightening us about the reasons for your () violation of one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia editing. The rest is (well crafted) noise.-  
""But, really,  enough about you.""  The Gnome
Yes, enough  your commentary on editors instead of their specific edits is not productive, and is frowned upon by the very guideline you just cited.  As for a violation to which you allude, could you please provide a diff, so that I may address it? Regards,   

 RfC Superhead nickname and porn video references 

References to Karrine Steffans being featured in a porn video and use of the nickname Superhead have been inconclusively discussed on the basis of WP:BLP guidelines. The controversy is covered in sources such as NY Daily News (which quotes Steffan) and the CBS business network. The Superhead nickname is confirmed by Steffans in a direct interview. Opinions, particularly on this specific interpretation of WP:BLP and WP:NOTCENSORED are welcome in order to resolve this discussion which has been running for over a year.   

Really, Fæ, is this a ""brief, neutral statement of the issue"" that RfC requires (emphasis in original)? —  Talk/Stalk 
Feel free to re-write it, I'm not enamoured with it. I thought it was long but factual.   
Trimmed it down, in particular cutting the explanation:    
Comment - I'd be willing to help out, but I need clarification on the precise issue:  does the sourcing issue revolve around whether or not she uses the nickname ""Superhead""?  Or whether or not she made an adult video?    
There are multiple issues, but each have failed to meet the high quality sourcing requirements required by WP:BLP.  We