":It seems that you are right that the words of Rawat's mother were added  not mixed with, which leaves open the possibility of being obviously and thus deceptively interwoven, but added to some quotes of Rawat's in the quotes section of EPO.  But even a cynic like yourself must concede that it was probably an honest mistake.  First, there isn't a single other case of false attribution, mistaken or otherwise, that's ever been made out against EPO that I can recall.  John and Jean-Michel who've done most, if not all, the work have been meticulous throughout.  Plus, they have openly invited corrections if and when any mistakes were noted.  This is an opportunity for you, then, to make EPO even better.  Congratulations for doing a small part in bringing the truth about Rawat to the general publice.

Also, the Mata Ji quote is in a set of sample quotes from the book, Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji?.  It is just that.  The only error is that the quotes are in the section of Rawat's own quotes and not the more general category of all quotes of interest.  In other words a simple mistake just like you said. On the other hand, you also make accusations of quotes ""out of context"".  You have offered no support at all for this accusation.  It's time you did or gave up that scurrilous accusation. On that score, you also alleged that the editors of the above book themselves wrote some of the quotes in question.  Where's your evidence for that?  I say there's none and if you know better now's the time to show your proof.  Otherwise, why say it?

But what's really funny is how you yourself are so clearly guilty of doing just that, taking quotes out of context.  For some reason you felt compelled to drag in comments from an ex-premie forum here.  Whatever the wisdom of that, you'd think you, a serious academic with a keen eye for ""contextual abuse"" would know better than to say that I said you ""need to be slapped in the face"" when what I really said was:

""Her entire thesis is offensive and unsubstantiated by the evidence.  She deserves the academic equivalent of a slap in the face."" (My emphasis).  

If you can't tell the difference, you're not fit to do the kind of careful analysis you purport to do.  If you can tell the difference, you're being purposely misleading and provocative.  Your choice.
 

"