"

Err...thanks for your recent ""warning"" - which itself comes across as a kind of ""threat"", especially when you say, ominously, ""You will not be warned again"" (but who's keeping score of threats around here?).  Please feel free to edit my own ""contribution"" for me and repost it.  How does that sound?  If you can't (or won't), how the Hell do I know what's OK and what's not OK in it?  I won't keep ""guessing"" what your problem is with the piece because I HAVE NO IDEA.  Could you please be specific in your objections.  Just referring to the guidelines on soapboxing makes no sense because none of this is actually putting any new material into any article.  It simply refers to old versions of existing articles.  WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT???  "