"::::::If the newsletters were written by Paul, sure, I would be fine with labeling them ""Paul's"". You have a source for that? Note that I don't deny the facts, but rather dispute it follows logically that these are ""his newsletters"". It is also a question of semiotics: when I hear ""Paul's newsletters"" I picture him sitting over his typewriter cranking out the latest issue, or at least Paul actively editing and overseeing the publication. I do not picture an operation sixty miles away with ghostwriters publishing a newsletter under his name while Paul is busy delivering babies elsewhere. Claiming we know it is ""Paul's newsletter"" is misleading.  
"