️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️  <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> ️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️ <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> a two-year freeze on some benefits and a lowering of the new benefits cap<unk> the maximum amount in benefits a household can receive<unk> from £26,000 to £23,000 are already on the agenda. The Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests those measures would save £2billion a year by 2017-18.<unk> ️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️<unk>️ 23,000 would vary across the country, with the highest sum paid in London, where housing costs are greatest. <unk>23,000 would vary across the country, with the highest sum paid in London, where housing costs are greatest. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> a move that would prove highly controversial. <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> 30% of claimants, over 300,000 families, would lose about £80 per week, saving taxpayers £1.3billion. <unk> <unk> <unk>
<unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> All the main parties are committed to money-saving welfare reform. <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk> <unk>