Rubuta ci gaba ga wannan sakin layi - Michael Foot ya matsa don binciken na musamman a cikin layin binciken Majalisar game da Harin da aka kai wa Dardanelles a Yaƙin Duniya na Farko, kodayake Harold Wilson (Firai Ministan Kwadago 1964<unk>70 da 1974<unk>76) ya ɗauki lamarin a matsayin gwangwani na tsutsa mafi kyau ba a buɗe ba. Wannan magana ta tsaya bayan da Isra'ila ta ci sojojin Larabawa a cikin Yakin Kwana shida na 1967, bayan haka Eden ya sami imel da yawa yana gaya masa cewa ya yi daidai, kuma mutuncinsa, ba a cikin Isra'ila da Amurka ba, ya tashi. A cikin 1986 Edinan tarihin tarihin Eden Robert Rhodes James ya sake kimantawa da tausayi game da matsayin Eden a kan Suez kuma a cikin 1990, bayan mamayewar Iraqi na Kuwait
, Yaƙub ya yi tambaya: "Wanene yanzu zai iya cewa Eden ba daidai ba ne?". Irin waɗannan hujjojin sun fi mayar da hankali kan ko, a matsayin batun siyasa, aikin Suez ya kasance yana da matsala ko kuma, kamar yadda irin waɗannan "masu gyara" suka yi tunani, rashin goyon bayan Amurka ya ba da ra'ayi cewa Yammacin ya rabu da rauni. Anthony Nutting, wanda ya yi murabus a matsayin Ministan Harkokin Waje a kan Suez, ya bayyana ra'ayin da ya gabata a 1967, shekarar Arab-Israeli War-Day War, lokacin da ya rubuta cewa "mun shuka iska mai zafi kuma za mu girbe guguwar fansa da tawaye". Sabanin haka, Jonathan Pearson ya yi jayayya a cikin "Sir Anthony Eden da Suez Crisis: Reluctant Gamble" (2002) cewa Eden ya fi jinkiri da ƙarancin yaƙi fiye da yadda yawancin masana tarihi suka yanke hukunci. D. R. Thorpe, wani daga cikin marubutan tarihin Eden, ya rubuta cewa Suez ya kasance "wani mummunan bala'i ne ga firaministansa, kuma wanda ya zo ya dauki muhimmiyar mahimmanci a duk wani kimantawa na ayyukansa"; ya nuna cewa idan Suez ya ci nasara, "babu shakka babu yakin Gabas ta Tsakiya a 1967, kuma mai yiwuwa babu yakin Yom Kippur a 1973 kuma".