Duba wurin da ke ƙasa sannan ka amsa tambayar daga baya a cikin harshe ɗaya kamar yadda wurin yake:  Passage: Masana ilimin taurari irin su David Morrison sun yi jayayya cewa tsaka-tsakin galactic wani layi ne wanda ba za a iya yin amfani da shi ba kuma ba za a iya zana shi daidai ba, saboda ba zai yiwu a ƙayyade iyakokin Milky Way ba, wanda ya bambanta dangane da tsabta na gani. Jenkins ya yi iƙirarin cewa ya yanke hukuncinsa game da wurin da aka yi amfani da galactic equator daga abubuwan da aka gani a sama da mita 11,000 (3,400 m), wani tsawo wanda ya ba da hoto mafi kyau game da Milky Way fiye da Maya. Bugu da ƙari, tun da yake Rana tana da rabin digiri mai faɗi, matsayinta na solstice yana ɗaukar shekaru 36 kafin ya cika faɗinta. Jenkins da kansa ya lura cewa ko da an ba shi wurin da aka ƙayyade don layin mahaɗan galactic, mafi daidaitattun daidaito tare da tsakiyar Rana ya riga ya faru a 1998, kuma don haka ya tabbatar da cewa, maimakon 2012, daidaitawar galactic maimakon haka yana mai da hankali ne a kan shekaru da yawa da ke tsakiyar 1998. Babu wata hujja bayyananniya da ke nuna cewa Maya na gargajiya sun san abin da ya faru. Wasu malaman Maya, kamar Barbara MacLeod, Michael Grofe, Eva Hunt, Gordon Brotherston, da Anthony Aveni, sun ba da shawarar cewa wasu ranakun tsarki na Maya sun kasance a cikin lokutan sake zagayowar, amma ra'ayin masana a kan batun ya kasance rarraba. Har ila yau, akwai ƙaramin tabbaci, na kayan tarihi ko na tarihi, cewa Mayawa sun ba da muhimmanci ga solstices ko equinoxes. Zai yiwu cewa farkon mutanen Mesoamerican ne kawai suka lura da solstices, amma wannan ma batun ce da ake jayayya a tsakanin Mayanists. Har ila yau, babu wata shaida cewa Maya na gargajiya sun ba da muhimmanci ga Milky Way; babu wani glyph a cikin tsarin rubutun su don wakiltar shi, kuma babu teburin astronomical ko na zamani da aka ɗaure shi.  Tambaya: Wace sana'a ce David Morrison?
Masanan taurari