Germany: Employee and Entrepreneur at same time (for getting AppStore payments)
"(Selling apps is AFAIK business, not freelancing - unless the type of app you produce is considered a freelancing subject. The tax office will give you a questionnaire and then decide).  As Einzelunternehmer, you can receive the payments for the apps to the same account where your wages go. However, there are lots of online accounts that do not cost fees, so consider to receive them on a separate account so you have the business and private kind of separate (for small Einzelunternehmer, there is no legal separation between business and private money - you have full liability with your private money for the business).  The local chamber of commerce can tell you everything about setting up such a business, ask them (you'll probably have to become a member there anyways). They have information as well on VAT (Umsatzsteuer, USt) which you need to declare unless you get an exemption (probably possible), and about Gewerbesteuer (the income tax of the business) etc. For the tax, you have ""subforms""  for the income tax e.g. for wages and for business income, so you just submit both with the main form. You'll get an appropriate tax number when registering the business.  Social security/insurance: as long as the app selling is only a side business, the social insurance payments for your main job completely cover the side job as well. You need to make sure that your employment contract is compatible with the app business, though.  A quick search indicates that there is a tax treaty between Germany and the Ukraine, Wikipedia says there are no contracts about social insurance in effect (yet)." In Germany you can register a Einzelunternehmen and receive payments into your personal bank account with a German bank. Apple will certainly be able to transfer to accounts in Germany as payments go via the European SEPA standard. Tax wise if you are living in Germany you will need to pay tax in Germany, so this is really the easiest way of doing it.
Just because he wasn't management doesn't mean he didn't maliciously break the law to bypass environmental laws.  They are after management also but will have a hell of a time extraditing VW executives from Germany where they are treated like royalty.   &gt; Robert Liang, 63, knew the German automaker was cheating and worked to cover it up, U.S. District Court Judge Sean Cox said during the sentencing hearing in Detroit.  &gt; He is one of two VW employees to plead guilty, although others charged in the case are in Germany and out of reach. "The question is about the dealer, right?  The dealer isn't providing this financing to you, Alfa is, and they're paying the dealer that same ""On the Road"" price when you finance the purchase.  So the dealer gets the same amount either way. The financing, through Alfa, means your payments go to Alfa.  And they're willing to give you 3,000 towards purchase of the car at the dealer in order to motivate those who can afford payments but not full cash for the car.  They end up selling more cars this way, keeping the factories busy and employees and stockholders happy along the way.  At least, that's how it's supposed to work out." "&gt; but the buying power of that money can be significantly reduced to the point where it's fundamentally useless, i.e. inter-war Germany and many countries in South and Central America.  That's true, but *how* does that come about? The effect on buying power stems from the level of spending in the present period. Too little leaves you anywhere from outright deflation and contraction to weaker growth falling short of capacity. Too much reaches capacity and keeps spending, bidding up prices and driving down purchasing power.  It has nothing to do with debt:GDP or interest payments.  &gt; Germany managed to skate by by creating a new Deutschmark in a confidence trick, and it worked because Germany is a solid, iron clad manufacturing powerhouse of a lot of stuff.   There are two important differences between inter-war Germany and the US. First is that inter-war Germany *lost a war*. This real shock is kind of important. When you're talking about buying power of money, one side of it is the amount of money in circulation but the other side of it is how much real output there is to buy and German real output capacity collapsed after the war. Their most productive regions were occupied territory and they were no longer a powerhouse manufacturing a lot of stuff, driving down the value of their currency.  So lesson number one from Germany: real output collapse harms your currency.  The second problem is that losing a war left Germany saddled with war reparations denominated in foreign currency. When you're on the hook for something you don't print you're in a situation where you can run out of money and that's exactly what happened to them. They tried printing more of their own currency to buy the foreign stuff with but that quickly drove down the value of German currency.  So lesson number two from Germany is you don't want to be on the hook for a currency you don't issue.  Put the two together and you have a real supply shock + foreign-denominated debt eviscerating the buying power of German currency. It wasn't debt:GDP but the real basis for their economy collapsing out from under them pushed along by a need for foreign currency.  &gt;My question is, at what point do we engage Washington's unlimited money printing presses until we reach that point?  In answer to your question, the printing presses are what funds the real economy. The worry in terms of avoiding ""that point"" is in making sure we keep that real economy productive and fully funded. Ironically, taking our eye off the ball to focus on budget balance at the expense of real output pushes the economy in the direction you're afraid of going. See also: the euro zone today." The doing of it, the actual floral design part, is a small part of what that business is going to need. The needs of a small business are huge and varied.  For instance,  somebody will need to do the Quickbooks, handle the register and cash,  handle clients and follow-up.   Do payroll even if it is just the two of you. Handle insurance.  Place orders for inventory, develop relationships with suppliers to keep costs down. Do marketing. Calculate profitability and use that to determine pricing,  specials,  and discounting on bulk orders. Clean the shop and enable your flower arranger to work effeciently.  Need employees?  Then get ready for applications, interviews,  onboarding, reviews,  coaching,  and firing. Create checklists and best practices.  The Small Business Association is your friend. It's a government program that is already paid for by you,  and the employees are generally successful entrepreneurs that just don't feel like doing the 80 hours a week anymore. They will be so happy to mentor you and can really assist if you are looking for a loan to start up.   Small business isn't for everybody.  I think most people would rather work 40 hours a week for somebody else. If none of this scares you off, you might have what it takes. Starting and running a business is incredibly rewarding for me emotionally and financially and I wouldn't trade it for any job on the planet. "First, I'm not a CPA or international tax accountant; my entire understanding of the French tax system is entirely from what I've read in places like the WSJ, Barrons, WaPo, etc.   However, ***my understanding*** is that French tax law works something like this. Let's say France has a tax rate of 35%. First, it must be assessed where the controlling entity is. In this case, if the majority of production and labor, or if the corporation is primarily based in France, it would proceed as follows. Taxes are initially paid based on transfer pricing to the original local entity (this avoids ""double taxation""). So in the example above, you would pay 10% to India on the $3,000,000 in profits ($300,000). You would then reduce the 35% French tax rate by the 10% already paid. This means you would pay an additional 25% to France ($750,000). The premise is that you have an effective ""minimum"" tax threshold for being in France. In the case above, companies like GE would have to pay the difference (this doesn't get into tax breaks/shelters on previously recorded losses, etc.).   Again, ***I AM NOT SURE ON THIS***. This is my basic understanding and am by no means a tax accountant/lawyer/etc. From what I understand; however, this hasn't necessarily been a good thing for France either (California is likely a similar case study with the Unitary return requirement). The fact is the world is very global nowadays. Its easier and cheaper for the companies to just leave instead of being forced to pay higher taxes...  IMO, Germany hit it right on the head. Low corporate tax rates with high personal tax rates. This maintains a very business friendly environment (business move there because of the skilled labor and low corporate taxes), but they effectively pass the burden on to individuals (who also benefit from the pro-business environment). You'd be hard pressed to find an economist that doesn't think Germany's economy has been very strong over the past decade (very good Soros speech that was recently posted about his analysis of the Euro and Germany's unfair benefits, but that's a whole different gear).   What I find the issue to be is the whole concept is complex enough that's difficult to explain to the average person with a 2 second attention span. That's why I like writing posts like this, to try to help people understand how finance and businesses operate behind the scenes!" "Someone has made such an app.  It's called Arcade City.  See https://arcade.city/    There are a few other similar projects in the cryptocurrency world, that connect buyers and sellers directly in a ""gig economy"" marketplace and allow payment in crypto.  User ratings and reviews are central to the model." "&gt; Are there any good reasons for apps to keep tracking you even if you're not using it ?  Uh yeah, so they can collect revenue by selling the data they collect.  Duh...   /s  Seriously though, its been in Apples best interest to encourage this type of monetization, because it incentivizes app developers to create apps and release them for ""free""." "You're right, but netting $150,000 a year isn't really even that tough for a savvy individual with the skill set of talented developer.  ""Creating an app"" is far from the only option to make that money anyways (in fact, you're probably correct in your condescending tone mentioning it).    Why would an intelligent skilled worker tether themselves to a desk in Seattle, when they could easily do just as well financially, and live where, and work when, they please?  There are definitely some people who would value the steady, and certain, paycheck.  But, becoming a talented developer requires a level of ambition and self-motivation in and of itself that caters to entrepreneurship well.   The issue is that MSFT doesn't want to pay what good programmers are actually worth, according to the market.  So, they run PR campaigns and lobby the government to bring in workers that will happily work for under true market rate.  Granted, these Visa workers pay taxes, and get great jobs.  That doesn't really hide the fact that these workers help lower the wages that they ""should"" be paying, according to basic supply and demand."