What is the different between one company's two OTCMKTS symbols?
I have not looked in details but apparently the company has (at least) a dual listing in Hong Kong (its main listing, ticker 700) and in the US (ticker TCTZF). It also has an ADR (TCEHY), the underlying of which is the HK line. The two US listings essentially trade at the same price and will provide very similar returns but a major difference is that TCTZF pays dividends in HKD whereas TCEHY pays its dividends in USD. The latter may be more convenient depending on the account you use to trade the stock. The ADR line is also more liquid.
"Sorry for the late reply.  &gt; Different ERP systems have different mappings, but there are no unlimited amount of ERP systems.  It's actually close to unlimited. Reasons:  1. Even if two customers use the same ERP system, each implement their ERP in a different way.  2. Even if they implement the ERP system exactly the same way, the EDI is done by an EDI subsystem and each customer will implement EDI in a different way.  3. Even if it's the same EDI system and map, each customer may have different meaning to the same data field. For example, one customer definition for Due Date is ""the date the Vendor needs to ship the goods to me"" while the other customer says ""it's the date I want the goods delivered to my warehouse.""  4. Even if all the fields have the exact same definition, the values may be different between the 2 customers. Classic example: while customer A use SKU# ""1234"" for a certain widget made by the vendor, the other customer may use SKU# ""9876"".  5. It's even worse than you think: if say a huge company like Wal-Mart implemented EDI orders in its specific way, Wal-Mart has 100,000 suppliers, so each of those suppliers have to implement the Wal-Mart way of EDI orders.  6. Even worse: when Wal-Mart make a change to their EDI orders (e.g. add a new type of data), 100,000 suppliers have to change their system support the new data requirements.  **Do me a favor? I only addresses one statement you made. Can you cut-and-paste your whole message and post it again in /r/edi?** This is the right subreddit for this discussion. You should join it and several people can reply to you...  Thanks!" From March 26th to May 3rd FACE had an average trade volume of 11,657 shares. May 4th Bloomberg published its widely reported [article](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-03/zuckerberg-s-facebook-ipo-will-make-him-richer-than-ballmer.html) about how the upcoming Facebook IPO would make Zuckerberg one of the richest people in the world. On May 4th, 212,000 shares of FACE were traded (an 18x increase) and the price jumped from 3.10 to 3.79, up 22%.  Maybe it's not that surprising, considering even news articles in [Yahoo! Finance](http://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-underwriters-1-1-percent-010320322.html) can't keep the companies straight.  Still, if you accidentally bought FACE it's not all that bad. In fact, [you're doing much better](http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=FB+Interactive#symbol=fb;range=20120518,20120601;compare=face;).  Yes, FACE's 10-Q came out the previous day, but past 10-Q releases didn't result in any sudden increase in trading volume at all: [11/3/2011](http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=FACE+Interactive#symbol=face;range=20111018,20111111;), [8/4/2011](http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=FACE+Interactive#symbol=face;range=20110718,20110811;), [5/5/2011](http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=FACE+Interactive#symbol=face;range=20110418,20110511;) I still don't understand this, you have an option between two cars, they are exactly the same except for one is cheaper and has less battery capacity, that means the company who built it is making less money on the cheaper one, and you have the choice between the two cars. You could very easily just buy the more expensive one if you have the money then, or you can afford it now until you have the money later, always your choice. If you don't like it, buy the more-expensive bigger battery, not the cheaper car that costs the same net price after the upgrade. What's wrong with that? A company's Return on Equity (ROE) is its net income divided by its shareholder's equity.  The shareholder's equity is the difference between total assets and total liabilities, and is not dependent on the stock price. What it takes to have a ROE over 100% is to have the income be greater than the equity.  This might happen for a variety of reasons, but one way a high ROE happens is if the shareholder's equity (the divisor) is small, which can occur if past losses have eroded the company's capital (the original invested cash and retained earnings).  If the equity has become a small value, the income for some period might exceed it, and so the ROE would be over 100%. Operating margin is not closely related to ROE.  Although operating income is related to net income, to calculate the margin you divide by sales, which is completely unrelated to shareholder's equity.  So there is no relationship with ROE to be expected.  Operating margin is primarily dependent on market conditions, and can be substantially different in different industries. ACWI refers to a fund that tracks the MSCI All Country World Index, which is  A market capitalization weighted index designed to provide a broad measure of equity-market performance throughout the world. The MSCI ACWI is maintained by Morgan Stanley Capital International, and is comprised of stocks from both developed and emerging markets.  The ex-US in the name implies exactly what it sounds; this fund probably invests in stock markets (or stock market indexes) of the countries in the index, except the US. Brd Mkt refers to a Broad Market index, which, in the US, means that the fund attempts to track the performance of a wide swath of the US stock market (wider than just the S&P 500, for example). The Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index, the Wilshire 5000 index, the Russell 2000 index, the MSCI US Broad Market Index, and the CRSP US Total Market Index are all examples of such an index. This could also refer to a fund similar to the one above in that it tracks a broad swath of the several stock markets across the world. I spoke with BNY Mellon about the rest, and they told me this: EB - Employee Benefit (a bank collective fund for ERISA qualified assets) DL - Daily Liquid (provides for daily trading of fund shares) SL - Securities Lending (fund engages in the BNY Mellon securities lending program) Non-SL - Non-Securities Lending (fund does not engage in the BNY Mellon securities lending program) I'll add more detail. EB (Employee Benefit) refers to plans that fall under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which are a set a laws that govern employee pensions and retirement plans. This is simply BNY Mellon's designation for funds that are offered through 401(k)'s and other retirement vehicles. As I said before, DL refers to Daily Liquidity, which means that you can buy into and sell out of the fund on a daily basis. There may be fees for this in your plan, however. SL (Securities Lending) often refers to institutional funds that loan out their long positions to investment banks or brokers so that the clients of those banks/brokerages can sell the shares short. This SeekingAlpha article has a good explanation of how this procedure works in practice for ETF's, and the procedure is identical for mutual funds: An exchange-traded fund lends out shares of its holdings to another party and charges a rental fee. Running a securities-lending program is another way for an ETF provider to wring more return out of a fund's holdings. Revenue from these programs is used to offset a fund's expenses, which allows the provider to charge a lower expense ratio and/or tighten the performance gap between an ETF and its benchmark. I'm a bot, *bleep*, *bloop*. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:  - [/r/talkbusiness] [Operational Excellence: Your Company's Future Depends On It](https://np.reddit.com/r/talkbusiness/comments/78pz4r/operational_excellence_your_companys_future/)  [](#footer)*^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^\([Info](/r/TotesMessenger) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=/r/TotesMessenger))*  [](#bot) I would say that there is no real difference.  Asset management companies that is part of large banking groups usually seat in separate entities and operate independently from the rest of the bank. Assuming proper procedures (and regulators usually check that) are in place they will not share information with the rest of the bank and their assets are clearly segregated from the rest of the bank. They have the same fiduciary duties as an independent AM and are probably using the broker/dealer services of other banks as well as their parent. Reputation is a key issue for banks and conflict of interests are usually managed properly. Independence also comes and goes. The corporate history of Neuberger Berman is a good example. Neuberger Berman was once an independent asset manager. In 2003, it merged with Lehman Brothers, thus loosing its independence. When Lehman went bankrupt in 2008, NB did not join its parent company in bankruptcy and did not lose the assets of its clients. The company continued to operate until it was acquired by the management. Finally it is mostly a question of marketing and positioning. I thought Google (Alphabet) filed a suit against Uber for copyright infringement just a few months ago?   If that's still going on, then I'd imagine this is Alphabet setting the table for a stranglehold on a business model that could take over an entire industry.