Based on your financial expertise, provide your response or viewpoint on the given financial question or topic. The response format is open.

Is the return on investment better with high or low dividends?
Someone (I forget who) did a study on classifying total return by the dividend profiles. In descending order by category, the results were as follows: 1) Growing dividends. These tend to be moderate yielders, say 2%-3% a year in today's markets. Because their dividends are starting from a low level, the growth of dividends is much higher than stocks in the next category. 2) "Flat" dividends. These tend to be higher yielders, 5% and up, but growing not at all, like interest on bonds, or very slowly (less than 2%-3% a year). 3) No dividends. A "neutral" posture. 4) Dividend cutters. Just "bad news."