hello everyone risk mr. thrive and
survive this is a reproduction of
Malcolm Boden's original video this one
here uses his audio a person here did a
remake of the graphics which are much
better in this one I will have links to
both of those videos below this is a
response to someone who, believe it or
not, as for the shadows, he doesn't want
to believe anything unless it's
peer-reviewed he thinks i'm way too
confident of myself why don't i sent it
in to be peer-reviewed. Well that's like
a sheep going to a jury of 12 wolves and
submitting a paper stating that sheep
shouldn't be eaten for dinner. This is
the way it works. It's  a religion of
science and until you want to break out
of your own cognitive dissidence you are
not going to see that in any case. I'm
going to show proof here not only that
the earth does not move but I'm going to
show that it is peer-reviewed science
that shows that the earth does not move.
But this has been hidden from the public
and ask yourself the question: Why? So
without further ado let's get into this
video. I think most of you will enjoy
this.. take care! If a telescope is
pointing at a star and both are
stationary then obviously the light
comes straight into the telescope. In
1729 Bradley found that he had to tip
his telescope forward very slightly to
get a star in the center of his
telescope. It was assumed that this was
due to the motion of the earth around
the Sun. Let us assume that the telescope
was moving at five mile an hour and had
to be tipped five degrees. This five degrees
tipping however could equally be caused
by the ether moving at five mile an hour
carrying the Stars around the earth. As
we see here, the light would be coming in
at the same angle and the telescope
would still have to be tipped five
degrees. So tipping the telescope does
not tell us whether it is the starlight
moving or the telescope moving. However
there is a simple experiment that can
determine whether it was the earth that
was moving or the ether and starlight.
All that you had to do was record the
tipping required for any particular star
then fill the telescope with water which
greatly slows down the speed of light in
the telescope
so here is the moving telescope filled
with water
tipped up five degrees and you can see
that the Starlight does not now reach
the eyepiece at the bottom this is
because the Starlight moves much more
slowly when passing through water
however if the telescope is tipped
further say ten degrees then the
Starlight will then be visible again in
the eyepiece it has to be tipped further
because the light is now slower when in
the telescope but if the Starlight is
going past the telescope at five mile an
hour then when it is filled with water
no to her further tipping is needed
because the light is coming in at five
degrees anyway
the Starlight stays on the same par but
is only traveling slower in the water
karika if it is the telescope that is
moving then when it is filled with water
it has to be tipped further to see the
star if the telescope is stationary and
the Starlight drifting past us then it
does not have to be tipped further in
1871 George Biddle airy the astronomer
royal performed this experiment
this is a copy from his original report
you can see that the two readings are
virtually identical if it had been the
telescope that was moving area expected
a figure of 30 seconds of Arc
in fact he only managed to read 0.8
seconds of Arc difference
Bradley first discovered stellar
aberration and it is interesting that in
his report
Harry mentions that it was now about 100
seconds of arc and that it was still
slowly diminishing this indicates that
the speed of light was still decreasing
in measurable amounts when Arry
performed his experiment in 1871
Bradley first discovered stellar
aberration and it is interesting that in
his report Harry the result of Aries
experiment known as Aries failure was
that the telescope does not have to be
tipped further this proved that it was
the incoming light that was moving past
a stationary telescope fixed to the
stationary earth
what is interesting in his very brief
report of only four pages is that not
once did he refer to the astonishing
results that the experiment proved
that the earth was stationary that the
earth was stationary
you
this experiment was also dismissed by
Wikipedia which said either drag test
under the main article luminiferous
ether by means of a water-filled
telescope Harry in 1871 looked for a
change in stellar aberration through the
refracting water due to an ether drag
like in all other either drift
experiments he obtained a negative
result this is a gross distortion of the
truth then he did not have to change the
angle prove that it was the ether
drifting past the stationary surface of
the earth where there you have it
everyone peer-reviewed just what people
want to see so why is this ignored well
you know why this is ignored because
this definitely tells you that the earth
is not moving in fact no experiment ever
has shown that the earth moves but Airy
even though this is a very basic very
simple very easily repeatable experiment
which it's been repeated and no one has
ever come up with anything else but
you're never going to hear about that he
wasn't the only one there's other ways
to attack this you have somebody named
Michelson who was a scientist who in the
late seventeen I'm sorry in the late
19th century the late 1800s he proposed
several different sets of experiments
with different partners there is the
michelson-morley experiment Michelson
Gale Michelson and a few other people
there's also somebody named San yak that
did all kind of different experiments
with light and things like that and the
fact let me show you just a couple of
the screenshots here so that you can see
what I'm talking about
to use uh laser lights different things
like that you can pause and go back and
look at these as they came up look I
even got mathematical formulas which
everybody wants to see see the put these
experiments to where the Earth's
rotation should have made a difference
and they should have even been able to
tell the difference between the north
latitude and south latitude because the
the spin of the earth itself or the
travel of the earth also through the
universe around the Sun and thus should
also cause all kinds of different
changes depending if you're going in the
direction of movement or not well this
was a huge problem in the 1800s for
science
this actually was causing the spinning
ball to fall apart so let me continue on
here and show you something
and you'll see something very
interesting here look at these
subsequent experiments here here's
Michelson all right where he did it the
Year 1881 remember Einstein didn't come
along to 1905 Michelson and Morley but
let me go a little bit further here so
we can get the whole picture there we go
Michelson and Morley combined in
Cleveland in 1887 same results same
results the earth does not move a third
test and guys other scientists we're
duplicating these these were all
peer-reviewed documents peer-reviewed
science that not only these scientists
were don't but others were trying to
duplicate and guess what they all came
up the same result the earth was not
moving do you know how many people have
testified now online that our physics
majors and things like that whose take
they've never heard of Aires failure and
that these right here are saying Oh
Einstein got rid of that
but what touch on that in a second
morally and Miller even some somebody
without Michaelson got together 1902 to
1904 they spent two years on these
experiments here everyone showed the
earth did not move now you'll notice
that in 1905 Einstein comes along and
pretty much everybody gives up one other
person at least tried it somebody named
Miller in 1921 same result the earth
doesn't move why did these peoples give
up because Einstein in 1905 with his
special theory of relativity said that
well the earth coincidentally remember
in science was not supposed to be in
equal incidences coincidentally the
light that they were measuring shrank or
increased whatever you want to call it
in the direction of movement so that
they couldn't measure a difference so it
appeared that the earth wasn't moving
but these guys get did all kind of
different things when you go back and
look at this they did all kinds of
things that were not in the direction of
light so that there should have been a
difference they did it on angles and
different things like that still
negative result for the Merc for the
earth moving these are all peer-reviewed
so if that's what you want you've got it
so here's the deal show me peer-reviewed
science that says that the earth moves
show it to me I might believe it guess
what it doesn't exist guys so you people
out there who want to believe in this
mainstream science and who want to post
comments saying well well it's you uh
you're so confident of yourself rich why
don't you send this in and have a peer
reviewed why do I need somebody to
peer-review the fact that a shadow
cannot be smaller than the object that
is casting it which means if you have a
70 mile wide shadow there's a total
eclipse then guess what the moon can't
be any more than 70 miles wide according
to the physics of light and then
somebody else pointed out and said well
did you see there was a bigger shadow
they were showing it was going overall
in North America you conveniently forgot
about that
that was showing your path of partiality
partiality this is where guys you ever
stood and your shadow is like I don't
know say a building or trees beside you
and the sun's in your face so you walk
over to the part of the tree till it
gets the trees high enough to it blocks
the Sun in your face and it was a lot of
Heron here in Arizona you really look
for shade a lot in any case or even
here's even a better example you look at
a cloud in the distance you can see that
the cloud is casting a shadow and that
it's partially over the Sun but it's not
where you are that's not unbroken Umbra
that that the place where it is totally
eclipsed that should equal the width of
the casting object and it's not an
abrupt penumbra if it was the Sun would
be darker just not totally black where
you are that is not what we see at all
it's a sharp outline period so here's
the proof that the earth is stationary
I will take any proof that it is not now
everybody can come on here and say that
I'm not intelligent and I'm not smart
and whatever that's fine I take those
arrows I'm revealing the truth and guess
what there's treasure stored up for me
somewhere for taking those bullets and
I'll gladly accept those bullets the
truth will set you free are you willing
to accept the truth or do once you
choose voluntarily to remain in bondage
god bless each and every one of you take
care bye
you
