In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court
legalized abortion nationwide.
The decision is called Roe vs Wade, and
those who defend it are known as RoeBots.
This is how they think...
*Robot Voice*
First off, you never know
when an elected official
is going to be dragged 
into the abortion debate.
But even if a political office is completely
unrelated to the abortion issue,
the abortion views of someone 
seeking that office are still important.
After all, almost every decision a politician
will make has some moral component to it.
When they vote to spend money the 
country doesn’t have and can’t pay back,
that is not just a financial 
decision, it’s also a moral one.
When they decide to 
send soldiers into a war,
that is not just a military 
decision, it’s also a moral one.
And that same dynamic applies in this case.
A politician’s position on legalized 
abortion is an indicator
of that candidate’s ability 
 to make moral decisions,
and those who support legalized abortion are 
morally unfit to serve in any public office.
Also, the fact that most political offices
have nothing to do with abortion is irrelevant.
Remember, when a politician 
runs for political office,
they usually see it as a stepping 
stone to a higher office.
That means that if they get elected 
to a small town’s city council -
they may one day be running 
for the United States Senate.
And every rung they climb up that political
ladder, the harder it gets to take them out.
The bottom line is, anyone who 
votes pro-choice is pro-choice,
and people who help put a 
pro-choice politician into office
are directly responsible for every child 
killed by the actions of that politician.
And like it or not...
when pro-choice politicians get pro-life votes,
what they hear us saying is 
that we are not really serious.
Thanks for watching!
