If we would have to define what a"Internet User" is
we could say that it is any person who
through a computer or any device
becomes a consumer of "Immediacy"
When we do a search on "Google"
"Blogs" and other websites
are the "Sponsors" of this answers
that we seek so much
And when we enter them we found many volumes
of information segmented in paragraphs or section
Ideal for, through a quick scanning
you, as an user could determine
what do you want to find in so many gathered data
the same happens with "Memes"
mostly the ones that bring up Philosophical themes
that sometimes they try to make people enter the world of Philosophy
or a "Field of Thought" like if was "Fast Food"
Mcdonald's Hamburgers that don't have to taste great
but only come out quickly to be consumed in any way
The problem with this is that resuming an
abstract to a simple concept
Like one image with the phrase and the Philosopher
could end up "Blurring" the real meaning
which the author originally wanted to express
Because of that, we bring you phrases
that go round and, by consequence,
ended up being misinterpreted
5 PHILOSOPHICAL phrases that you didn't know their MEANING
"The end justifies the Means"
from Machiavelli
Probably you have read this phrase from a image
on Instagram with the face of the guy,
the sir Machiavelli
Well, this is a horrible misinterpretation
first a foremost because, he never said that
When I was 15 I liked reading books of "Governance and Power"
for that reason I read "The Prince" by this very man
No where in the book you will find him saying that phrase
In fact, if we wanna search who said that phrase
the most historically close that we have
is "Napoleon"
saying: "Win everytime, no matter how, and you always will be right"
Which it's not exactly the same thing
but at least it's close
The interesting part it's that you could probably thinking:
"Well, even if he didn't say that phrase, He probably thinked that way"
And that is also a mistake
because "The Prince" is a book that developes
the idea of keepinga "Dinasty" governing
even if you have to use "Cruelty"
So it is not any "Mean", it's the mean of "Governing"
And also you can't do anything, all the time
let's use "Cruelty" as an example
and it's crazy how objective he is explaining how to apply it
In fact, maybe you would say:
"Ohh, that's the book that "Maduro" read
And if he really read it, unfortunately
he didn't understand it
Lets quote him:
"The well used cruelties are the ones carried out in a single stroke,
to achieve firmness in power and and then are not continued.
Something that "Maduro" didn't get it
"The Penises"
"The only thing I know, is that I know nothing"
-Socrates
The world it's not only full of false understandings
but it's also composed of "Faked Ignorance"
or the divulgation of things
that you have total ignorance of
"The only thing I know, is that I know nothing"
It's a very popular phrase in every
Brain that stoped working of every mortal of this world
Tha talks and express, not because of being misunderstood
but for lacking understanding
Even if for some people the meaning is very simple
other people ignore that coming from a phrase
that at first may sound simple, the subsequent
branches of Philosophical thinking in later centuries
And not, it was not expressed as ineptitude
or "Eloquence" to avoid answering a complex question
in fact, it is all the opposite
So...
What does "The only thing I know, is that I know nothing" means?
It's told that someone asked the "Oracle of Delphis"
who was the most wise man of the world?
to which she answered that no one was more wise
than  "Socrates"
In that time this Philosopher heard the rumor
a rumor that was for him a revelation
and by cause and effect, he came up with an idea
to consult with people that worked with "Wisdom"
Politicians in politics,
Judges with Justice, and "Artists" regarding to art
For his suprise, he discovered that
no one was really sure about their knowledge or
their eminence in their field
So he said:
"They say that I'm the most wise man, without even me knowing it.
That is what distances me from the wise men, because they say
that they are wise but they are not."
This way he sets the base of his posterior way of thinking
"The most wise human being is the one who knows that
in regarding to knowledge he doesn't worth anything"
that is to say that people think that they know everything
when dominating "Technicality" and memorizing numbers and phrases
But in reality they ignore the essence of
any discipline that they play
They ignore the way of living
Now you know that this phrase is not to underrate
or utilize as ironic answer covering ourselves
of our own ignorance
"Not Knowing" is the best gif
of the avidity...
of learning new things
"Sometimes a cigarette it's just a cigarette"
-Simund Freud
This phrase said by the father of "Psychoanalysis"
it's not a story of a quartile heard often between his followers
but it's meaning is present in our daily life
ir our social, work and personal life
But it's meaning, even if we haven't heard the phrase
is distorted by our lack of logical reasoning
because something so simple may hide something more complex
In fact, the three most important worries
in the human being are: Sex, Survival and Death
And we make jokes of the three aspects
to show ourselves that deeply in ourselves we are fine
and that we fail in nothing in this "Allegory of Life"
But not because of that we have to correlate
one of them with the other
Our jokes about "Suicide" have nothing to do with
our assumption of Death
Neither the "Phallic" symbols has something to do with our sexuality
or how we develop in the sexual ambit
and psychologically
A cigarette is... just that... a cigarette
and not confound things
"Happiness it's just the absense of pain"
-Schopenhauer
Schopenhauer will not stop impressing us with his
conception of metaphysics with which that mysterious force
that controls the strings of our existence
Like I said in a previous video
Schopenhauer is the loyal "Banner" of pessimism
And like the thinker he was, is object of study
correlated with almost any scheme of thinking
researched to "Add more flavour to the soup"
An average person could take this to heart
the starkly suggestive what this man explained
the reality that we are condemned to live in
But it would be more like a "Pyramid"
Seen in a panoramic perspective
It's just a simple "Flat surface"
but seen in other angle
you will notice its different faces
So what happens with Happiness and Pain?
As well as "Darkness" is just the absence of "Light"
the same with pain, decanting what we perceive as "Happiness"
But both poles of the "Human Nature"
are always on a "Balance"
and like everything, while it's in perfect equilibrium
It will be perfect, just as Thanos said
If the pain which we experiment
could weigh, and in the other side of the balance
we put a happy expression
for a few seconds the balance will adquire
a rough movement in the opposite direction relation to its axis
and at the first experience of that euphoria
or pleasent feeling, it will return in to a rough descense
When the balance is in perfect stillness
we experience fullness and equilibrium
Something that it's not possible if
you are not conscious of the inherent pain and conditioned happiness
We can't think that happiness is all
because if we think that way we would live in a "Utopia"
and "Utopias", alike "Communism"...
do not work
It's the Man a failure by God, or God a Failure by Man?
-Friedrich Nietzsche
Alike other aphorisms of the same nature
like: "God is dead, we are the ones who killed him"
"God is still dead, we are the ones who killed him"
this phrases are the ones that
characterize the most philosophy memes
accompanied with his prominent mustache
to reinforce a reasoning that probably everyone concluded at reading it
"God does not exist"
Something that is not true, because this expression has
nothing to do with the belief or unbelief of God
To understand Nietzche o any other thinker
that was highlighted in certain time
we have to aboard the context of his thesis
taking into account the historical stigma of the time
The "Czarist Russia", the "Industrial Revolution"
and the constant antagonism between Capitalism of the burguest
and the communist ideas of "Marx"
and who the first vestiges of existentialism came from
based on the disaster and reborn of this acts
What this phenomena have in common
is that they are no new deities influencing 
into politics
they are no "Avatars" like the Egyptians
or Spirituality like Christianism, but purely bourgeoisie
in the hands of the men
because he is the one that has the total control
of the course and destiny of the ship
Is to say that we are entirily the owners of our own reality
without Atheism and Christianity truly impacting our life
To illustrate this better
On the side of Communism, the idolatry is
not to religious images, but instead to the "Communist Leaders"
While in Capitalism, the most powerful
and emblematic brands are the ones being idolized
In fact, the true "God" is born
from not knowing any cosmic or divine influence
Because the true "God" is inside all of us
Something that "Carl Jung" talks about
later when he develops his thesis on "Archetypes"
Something that we are going to talk in a video someday
Alright, even if It's true that we have
with one click any type of information known at the moment
We can't just conform with so little
"I can and must doubt"
The way that we are sewing the history
depends on our ability to write it
and writing is something that anyone can do
everything is written and humanity doesn't need
more lazy writings or flaccid thoughts parting from
images badly unfounded that we saw on internet
Humanity needs the good writing of its destiny
the ones who can elucidate correctly what is written
to write something new, or maybe...
simply better
"Don't repeat the history...
write something new"
