Just a very short question
We have talked a lot about Nelson Mandela
about South Africa,
and apartheid has 
been called to mind
and also boycott 
of apartheid
There is a 
memo written in 2010 by Michèle Alliot-Marie
which concerns the BDS campaign (Boycott Desinvestment
& Sanctions)
targetting Israel, the israeli goods
this memo penalizes and encourages prosecution
against 
people who call 
to this boycott
This memo has not been abrogated, is still
applied,
in the name of the struggle against racism
How could we consider the boycott against
South Africa was legitimate ?
and how could any boycott be illegitimate
today by principle when its tragets a country
?
I'm not talking about the specific case of
Israel
But the memo concerns any boycott not only
Israel
is boycott a racism weapon today, if it tagerts
the goods from a country ?
Well, objectively, in the history of struggles,
boycott is a militant act in France or everywhere
if the boycott clearly says that...
The question of the boycott 
is the question of the speech carried by the
boycott
Boycott as a militant act...proclaimed, which
comes to terms with itself...
The struggle against apartheid must not be
idealized
