>> We thank the donors of our channel  <<
In this episode we continue proving that Serbian is the language of primordial people of Europe
In the first episode of these mini series
our key evidence was
the etymological work of great 
Greek philologist Constantine Economos
especially his big Dictionaries from 1828
Although my intention in this episode was to present numerous evidences found in works of Economos
the spotlight belongs to one big name, to one of the greatest Greek philosophers: PLATO
In his dialogue "Cratylus"
Plato provided theoretical foundation along with concrete proofs
that support the theses we have been 
bringing forward on our channel
theses supported by other Serbian autochthonists
In fields of etymology of language
such as Radovan Damjanović
Slaviša Miljković
and many others
In his dialogue "Cratylus"
which we will use as a source for 
crucial evidences in this episode
Plato has cleary said that:
Greeks have gotten a lot of their own words from indigenous population, from "barbarians"
When analyzing words in "Cratylus", we will see that
the words of these "barbarians" were in fact our own, Serbian words
The second important thesis of Plato in "Cratylus"
the thesis that supports our own theses
 from previous episodes
was that many Greek words divert 
from their initial, original form
the form that has the genuine sound and true meaning
passed down from generation to generation 
[from knee to knee]
many words have lost their initial form!
That is what Plato claimed in "Cratylus"
and we will attest it in this episode
Plato strongly supported the thesis that each speech sound has its meaning
and when words are built, speech sounds are not used accidentally or randomly
Speech sounds ought to sound like 
the objects or events they describe!
 
All Greek writers of the Middle Ages
referred to Serbs as Tribals or Dalmats
John Skylitzes, Joannes Zonaras, Anna Komnene,  Kekavmen and Laonikos Chalkokondyles
considered that Serbs are 
autochthonous population of the Balkans
and in their works referred to Serbs as "Tribals"
Laonikos Chalkokondyles in his writings about Turks
named Serbian King Lazar: "the leader of Tribals"
You can see on your screen an insert from 
this great 15th century script
written by Laonikos Chalkokondyles
where he described the "Battle for Kosovo"
and named Lazar "the Despot of Tribals"
Laonikos Chalkokondyles is known 
for his famous sentence:
"Tribals = Serbs are the oldest nation"
which was later taken as a title for
great historical encyclopedia written by
Olga Luković Pjanović
Why is this important?
It is important, because  we find a term "barbarians" in Greek ancient literature
They meant: "Tribals"
or Thracian and so called "Illyrian" tribes
In our primary source of evidence, Plato's "Cratylus"
we often find constructions as 
"barbarians" or "language of barbarians"
it is important here to explain which tribes exactly are these "barbarians"
The sole word "barbar" and its real meaning
I will explain at the end of this episode
At the beginning of "Cratylus", Plato wrote
that for each thing, object or event
exists one correct name or word
as for Barbarians, as for Greeks = the same word
Since the words of Greek language in Plato's times
have deviated from their original sounding
Plato tried to reconstruct them
through the dialogue between 
Socrates and Hermogenes
Through the character of Socrates, Plato was trying to
reveal the true meaning of 
most important words:
fire, water, air...
as well as the names of Ancient Gods
In Sections 409 and 410
Socrates told Hermogenes that the word "pir"
which Greeks use to describe "fire"
is in fact of "barbarian origin"
and so are many other Greek words
Quote: "I imagine that Greeks, 
especially those under barbarians,
have taken many names from these barbarians"
For the word "pir" for FIRE, Plato said the following:
"...beside that, it is known that Phrygians call it so, 
with slight modification
the same is for: water, dogs... and many other words"
We pause here, for our fist analysis
Plato informed us that "pir" 
is an indigenous, barbarian word
That Phrygians were obviously one of those 
indigenous barbarian tribes
and that Greeks took many words from barbarians
We also realise that Greeks were 
under the rule of barbarians
and that is the fact unrecognized by the official, mainstream historiography!
The word "pir" is typical for Serbian language
it is a so called "root word"
because out of this root many other words derived:
PUR-janje, PIR-enje, PIR-janje, ras-PIR-ivanje, u-PIR-anje, s-PIR-anje, is-PIR-anje, o-PIR-anje, pre-PIR-ka...
Maybe the most important word for our research, a derivative of the word "pir"
is the word vam-PIR [vampire]
This word is important because the whole official science agreed that this word originated ...
in Serbian language, and was then taken by most other world languages
Before we describe the word "pir" in detail
it is very important to emphasize that the indigenous inhabitants of Hum [Balkan]
in ancient scripts were mostly recorded as 
PELASTI or Pelasgi
There are only two options for who Pelasti may be:
1. An option imposed by "Byzantologists" and Vatican...
...which marks Pelasti as Albanian ancestors
2. An option supported by Serbian autochthonists
according to which: 
Pelasti were ancestors of Serbs and other Slavs!
Of course, the word "pir" exists in Serbian language
it is a "root-word"
important for building other words
As opposed to Albanian language, 
where this word does not exist!
We will now present clear and unambiguous evidence from Plato's "Cratylus"
hoping that Serbian Byzantologists, aka 'Vatican's peacetime army" - headed by Radivoje Radić
will change something in their discurs and how they educate young learners
Of course they won't!
Because they are paid to 
support historical falsifications
I even believe that Serbian Byzantologists would be ready to convince Plato himself of being ignorant
that Plato does not know the Greek language
and that Plato does not know which words are indigenous and which words are Greek
Serbian Byzantologists would not surprise me if they were to claim that "pir" is an Albanian word
although it does not exist in Albanian language
It is interesting that "fire" 
(as an equivalent for "pir" in Greek language)
Albanians call "žar" [zjarr] (borrowed from Serbian. Word ŽAR = live coals)
So, I ask myself, from which language is it taken?
Let's hear it in Google translator:
Albanians indeed were Pelasti (Pelazgi)  or Illyrians, 
the native population of our area
but only to 
"the extent they keep Serb words in their language"
Of course, this was an irony
although, it is more for crying rather than laughing
Because, when we see what Serbian Byzantologists and the so called "authorities in historiography"
write in textbooks and what they teach our children
It is indeed, a lot more subject for crying than laughing
Back to our research and evidence material
We will now explain in detail the root and the meaning
of this very important word:   P I R
The word "pir" has several meanings 
in Serbian language
One of the basic meanings of PIR is 
"making of air streams" or BLOWING
"PIR-iti" means "light air blowing"
or blowing to burst the fire
And that is when we say: 
"ras-PIR-uje vatru" [to burst fire]
Cooking on fire we call "PIR-janje"
Even though we were told over lifetime that "pir" is a Greek word, which we allegedly took over
Plato himself claimed "pir" is not a Greek word
but a word taken over from our ancestors
and that he would get stuck if trying to 
find origin and meaning of that word
As you can see in Serbian language, 
where the word "pir" originated from
PIR does not literally translate into "fire"
It stands more for: air streaming,
flow of air which helps growth of fire
It is commonly said that "air bursts fire"
Greeks as newcomers
took "pir" only to an extent
PIR has broad meanings in Serbian language,
but in Greek only stands for "fire"
The word PIR in Serbian language has wide meanings that we even find it in context of entertainment
where for "party" we  may say PIR
When talking about derivatives of the word PIR
we also have to mention the words:
"pre-PIR-ka" or "pre-PIR-anje"
 which stand for quarrel or heated discussion
which in itself assumes some kind of "fire"
The more we list the terms that belong to the same umbrella of meanings
it becomes evident why Plato gave up looking for origin and meaning of this word in Greek language
You already got used that we analyze words down to core vocal sounds
We will do the same with the word PIR
Plato in Sections 433 and 434
explained that things can only be properly named
if sounds resemble the thing they describe!
Quote: "Name ought to have letters that suite it"
"And those letters ought to resemble objects"
So, the sound R, according to Plato,
must represent a movement of solid matter
Which is an opinion supported by
Serbian autochthonists
The word PIR could be brought down to its basic foundation,
which is a consonant minimum: P and R
PR or PRRR
PRRR is an onomatopoeia of sounds from nature
Onomatopoeia PR is one complete word by itself
and a root foundation for building other words, like:
blowing, smoking, stewing, spreading, rinsing, arguing ...
Now, back to the word VAMPIRE
the one recognized by official world linguistics as original Serb word
The word PIR means streaming and flowing of air
Therefore, this word is a synonym for DISANJE [breathing]  and DUVANJE-DUHANJE [blowing]
and that is how we come to words 
DUH [ghost] and DAH [breath]
What differentiates a living man from a dead one is 
DUH - DAH - PIR
So, the word VAMPIRE we have to observe as a word coined out of two words:
VAN and PIR
Vampire is, therefore, a ghost [DUH] 
which is outside [VAN] of his body
or outside [VAN] his grave
Outside [VAN] of the normal form of ghost's existence
Because, we believe that a ghost can exist on this world inside a living human
or be invisible in afterlife, outside of human body
When a ghost [DUH or PIR] of a deceased person
steps out of boundaries of the afterlife
and shows up in our world in some bodily form
the ghost becomes a vampire!
We turn VAN+PIR to VAMPIR using common linguistic equation of consonants by place of formation
In this story about the origin of the word PIR
I cannot ignore Plato's statement
that "some Greeks were under the barbarian rule"
The official history hides this type of historical data
so we have to compare the translations
In English translation, it is said even more clearly:
"For the Hellens, especially those who were under the domination of the barbarians,
often borrowed words from them"
Since Plato lived before 
the conquests of Alexander the Great
we have to ask: under which indigenous barbarians
 did Greeks live for so long....
that they even took 
some of their most important words?
Judging by the word PIR we described in detail
and proved its Serb character
we can only place one possible thesis:
Those "Old Greeks" mentioned by Plato
lived under the domination of 
ancestors of Serbs and Slavs
The so called "Pelasti"
were ancestors of Serbs and Slavs
and from them Greeks took over 
the most important words
In his first book of "Serbian - Serbian Dictionary"
Radovan Damjanović connected the word "pir"
with PERUN - God of thunder and fire!
As well as with Vedic God of rain and thunder: Parjanya
This opinion is supported by Constantine Economos
the Greek linguist we mentioned earlier in the episode
When talking about Vedic religion and 
ancient philosophy
we have to mention the four basic elements of matter:
Earth, fire, water and air
When spoken out like this,  it doesn't mean that much
But if we say in Serbian:
Earth = Zemlja = TAR
Fire = Vatra = VATRA
Water = Voda = VOTAR
Air/Wind = Vazduh =VETAR
things get a different meaning
I do not want to overburden this episode with philosophy
neither with excessive etymologies
nor do I want to divert from topic
But, I have to provide here an example of the word "pir"
when we say in Serbian: wind blows = "vetar piri"
it refers to air
when we say: "pirja" or "purnja" [burst]
it represents fire
When we say "ispira" [rinse] or "pere" [wash]
it represents water
When we say 
"pari se" [steams] or "isparava" [evaporates]
it includes fire, air (wind) and water
Water or "wodr" is according to official science
the oldest Proto Indo European and Proto Serbian expression for "water"
In the same section of "Cratylus" where he elaborated on the origin of the word "pir"
Plato wrote that the Greek word for "water"
Is, in fact, a modified "barbarian" indigenous word
Plato pointed to Phrygians who may have had a similar word for "water" closer to its indigenous origin
Today, we have reconstructions of 
some of the Phrygian words
In the World Base of Proto Balcanic words
it is said that Phrygians used the word "vedu" for water
as it was written by Neroznak (1978) and Fasmer (1986)
On Phrygian territory
even older forms of this word originate from Hittites
Hittites, according to 
the World Base of extinct languages,
called water: WATAR
This points to conclusion 
that the four basic words for matter
came out of the same root
and ought to belong to the same confluence
In Serbian language this confluence can be reconstructed
precisely and easily as we did in this episode
Also, Aristotle added the fifth element: ETHER
which connects the previous four elements
And now we have a perfect line: 
va-tra, ve-tar, vo-tar, e-tar, tar
TAR is the a piece of soil which is rinsed, washed-off [tar-e, s-pir-a, is-pir-a] by water or wind
This foundation TR - TAR
is a root for building the Latin word for soil or ground: TERRA
or modern words like TERRITORY
TR as the foundation is a metathesis form of the oldest
Serbian word for soil/ground
and perhaps the oldest European word for soil/ground
and that is   R T
It is interesting, that the word PIR
with its different functions, connects all four basic elements of matter
PIR - piriti - vetar [blowing - wind]
PIR - pirjati - vatra [burst - fire]
PIR - spirati - votar [rinse - water]
In the following paragraph, 
Plato wrote that the word: GE
is not representing Earth as accurately 
as the word GAIA
Because GAIA is the female parent!
Here we have an allusion to Serb word:
 "gajiti" [foster, cultivate]
As we say: a mother "gaj-i" [raises] children, 
or "od-gaj-a" [breeds] children
GE is, according to Plato, GAIA
a female parent who breeds humanity
The same formulation you can also find in Oxford English Dictionary translation from 1892
as well as in the 
Ancient Greek language version from 1887
You may ask yourselves where are the originals?
Or, the old transcripts and translations?
Older than the 1887 transcription we were able to find...
...and that is what answers many of these questions...
The whole world of ancient scholarship
and Plato's work in particular
was unknown to European civilization 
for a very long time...
unknown and foreign through the entire Middle Ages
And then, in the late Middle Ages
emerged some bigger transcriptions and translations
of ancient scripts, including Plato's work
Most of these scripts
according to the official version of the truth
were found in the Arabic world
Amazingly, there is a span of about 2200 years
between the original Plato... 
and a version we widely use today
In the meantime, the wheel was spinning between the Ancient Greek language
to Latin, from Latin to Persian and Arabic,
back to Latin and Greek... English and so on
This whole confusion tells us 
that we live in some kind of matrix
in some kind of fake, imaginary world
The world based on information
which we ought to believe in
without any original sources of information
without many scripts of that same era
 of missing originals
But, we will discuss that some other time
Today, we are just going to ascertain
that even in such transcriptions and translations
which must deviate from the original words of Plato
we still find the convincing clues of truth!
Now we come to the well known word: "dvogon"
Plato, in Section 418e
claimed that the Greek word:"zygon"
for "jaram" [yoke]
does not mean anything!
This word, instead, out to be pronounced as: DUO-GON
Plato said that this exchange of D into Z
came as a novelty in Greek language
to make words sound more "noble"
These new forms, Plato called "inflated"
Or, as we would say in today's jargon: faked words
Platon said: "Because ZYGON does not mean anything...
...but the proper name would be of two animals harnessed to pull together...
DUO - GON
According to Plato: 
it is how his ancestors would have said it
Since the word DUO is clear, meaning two or a pair
Plato tried to decipher the other part of the compound: the word GON (gon-iti)
and words "goniti, gnati, ganjati" do not exist in Greek language of Plato's era
neither do they exist today!
So, instead, Plato tried to solve the problem using the Greek word "Agoge"
The meaning of this word is disputable
but, foremost it relates to a form of upbringing in Sparta
However, we have to realise that this archaism
we can find in various different meanings such as
"keeping" or "safeguarding"
It is clear that DUO-GON or DVO-GON
which Plato was trying to reconstruct
can find its meaning only in 
Serbian and Slavic languages
DVO-GON is a cart with two oxen
a yoke to be pulled by oxen
The words: goniti, ganjati, gnati, gnesti, gnetiti, gnječiti, ugnjetavati...
all belong to Serbian language
It is interesting that to this plethora of meanings
belong the words: 
za-GON-etka [riddle] and za-GON-etati [pose as a riddle]
From Plato's "Cratylus" we find out
that "dvogon" is an ancient word obviously used by indigenous inhabitants of this area
and they were our ancestors
and NOT the ancestors of Albanians
as we were told by Byzantologists and
 other soldiers of official dogmatism
In Section 396
Platon explained the name of God Zeus
Here we find an affirmation of those theses
I brought out in the episode about Diocletia (Duklja)
where I claimed and proved that
the word "Zeus"
stems from the Serb word DIV (serbian DIVINE GIANT)
This can be seen in our episode 
about Diocletia (Duklja) titled:
"Serbs are indigenous - one word is the proof"
In Section 396, Plato wrote: "The truth being said,
Zeus' name is something like a sentence
We slice it, and sometimes we use one part, 
sometimes the other part
Some call him Zeus, some call him Div
These names combined, reveal the nature of God"
In Greek translation from 1887
the following terms were used: Dia, Di, Dios
So we have to ask ourselves why did the Yugoslav translator in year 1979
decide to use DIV for all 
the three previously mentioned terms
And not just that
The greatest Serbian expert for Plato 
and Ancient Greece
Miloš Djurić, used the term DIV in all his translations
and he translated 22 most important works 
of Ancient Greece
Including Homer, Aeschylus, Sophocles,
 Aristotle and Plato
Djurić, the greatest Serbian expert for Ancient Greece, never used the term "Zeus"
but exclusively the word DIV
Here are some examples from Plato's work
 "Apology of Socrates"
Quote: "I swear in the name of Div
citizens of Athens
what you will hear me say
are not going to be debates like theirs
embellished with verbs and nouns"
Quote further: "In the name of your Div
do you really think I deny God?
Meletus responded: 
Yes. I swear to Div, you completely deny him!"
Plato's original inscription is missing
Yet, there are so called isoglosses
and various traces of inscription of Zeus' name
based on which scientists were able to 
reconstruct the original form
In the so called Linear B of Mycenaean-Cretan script
"Divo" and "Dive" were the two forms 
deciphered for Zeus
Linear B is about 3500 years old!
It is obvious that our translators relied exclusively
on reconstruction of Ancient Greek language
made by international linguistics science
The science claimed that the Greek "Dios"
evolved out of Proto Hellenic "Diyyos" and "Diyyos" evolved out of Proto Indo European "Diwyos"
and this one out of even older form "Dyew"
But, according to international paleolinguistics
as you can see on the screen: 
the so called "zero-grade" or zero form is the word DIW
An interesting example and confirmation that the word DIW is the oldest form
out of which the word "Zeus" originated
Is the Old Germanic name for God: TIW
The word "Tuesday" which in English 
represents a day in the week
in fact, originated from TIW-ES-DAEG
Which stands for TIW's or DIV's day
By the way, the quoted Serbian connoisseur and translator of Ancient texts, Miloš Djurić
used the name DIV for Zeus
not only in his translations of Ancient texts
but also in his scholar 
research and academic publications
Such as, for example:
"History of Hellenic Literature" and
"History of Hellenic Ethics"
It is interesting that Djurić never used the name "Zeus"
but exclusively the word "Div"
Beside that, Djurić in his book
 "History of Hellenic Literature"
wrote the entire section about 
similarities and identicalities
of Serbian folk epics and old Homeric epic word
We will elaborate in the following minutes
In Section titled: "Connections of Homer's Poetry with Our National Epics"
Djurić explained in 13 pages how patterns and systems of our national epics...
...are identical to Homeric epics
It is interesting, that such epics is not found among Greeks in the Middle Ages
Neither in current times
While it was preserved among Serb folk
until the modern times
Systems of comparison,
systems of repetition of epithets,
and tens of other identical characteristics:
Are alike for Serb epics and Homeric epics!
Will mention here just some of the similarities 
that Miloš Djurić wrote about
For example, identical numbers show up in Serb epics and in Homer's poetry:
3, 7, 9, 12 and 100
Number 3 repeats with Homer like this:
"Three cities are dearest to Hera"
"Agamemnon has three daughters"
"Three times Achilles chases Hector around the city"
"Three times Odysseus wants to hug his mother 
in the Underworld" and...
"...three times her shadows slips away"
In Serb epics, for example, in "Building of Skadar"
it is said: "Three brothers build the city,
up to three brothers, three Mrnjavčevićs
Three years to build the city
three years with three hundred workers"
Miloš Djurić provided examples for other numbers
as well as tens of other similarities
between Homeric and Serb epics
I can't help but mention a wit from Goran Šarić
who ironically said in one of our interviews:
"Up to about 1st century AD
Greeks have said all that they had to say"
And for that reason, philosophy, science and epics on the Balkans are continued by Serbs and Slavs
Of course, minding the joke, all said in this episode
as well as hundreds of ethnological, linguistic, genetic and archaeological proofs
point to the fact, that on our territory
a huge falsification was made
because indigenous inhabitants were named: "immigrants, newcovers, savages and barbarians"
And the real immigrants, Greeks, through series of historical falsifications
were proclaimed native and indigenous
and those that brought culture
Serbian is one of the rare living languages
that preserves the original form of one of the most basic human words:
the verb JESTE [it is]
You could include here other Slavic languages and German language with its form: IST
The importance of this word was
emphasized by Plato himself
Understanding that it is a "foreign name"
which has deformed, 
after being used by Greeks over time
In the story of Ousia
or JEST-ija or JEST-astvo
you will see the connection between Serbian and, 
the so called, Illyrian and Thracian languages
It is about the ending -ST
Which is used to build thousands of our words
In Greek, this ending is lost
as in most other European languages
And that is why we will now analyze 
Plato's words on this topic
In Section 401 C
Plato wrote about the important subject of Ousia
which means: essence, substance - "that what is"
Ousia is one of the most important 
Ancient philosophical terms
But also, one of the most important terms of 
Orthodox Christian theology
The essence or existence in Serbian can also be called: JEST-astvo
With Constantine Economos we find a form: EST-estvo
...that what is, what exists...
Plato noted that the word "ousia"
is not the most suitable for the term it expresses
and that it would be better to use "foreign words"
such as the word: ESTIA
Plato considered that it should be: ESTE [jeste]
for "that what it is"  [is] = JESTE
the proper way to name the existence (presence)
and not the words: usia/osia, 
that were found in Greek dialects
It is very important to emphasize
that suffix -ST in Serbian language
has the key role
in expressing what Plato wrote about
We will give examples here:
MLADO [young] + JEST [is] = MLADOST [youth]
ZRELO [ripe] + JEST [is] = ZRELOST [maturity]
RADO [willing] + JEST [is] = RADOST [happyness]
ŽALO [sad] + JEST [is] = ŽALOST [sorrow]
SPORO [slow] + JEST [is] = SPOROST [slowness]
...and thousand more examples...
where words end with -ST
thus expressing the state that is
The ending -ST has been defined as characteristic for "Illyrian and Thracian languages"
as Dr. Milan Budimir wrote in more detail in his book: "Pelasto-Slavica"
This -ST as one of the most important characteristics of Serbian/Illyrian/Thracian language
was obviously foreign to Greeks
so it phased out in time
Which is something we can see best  in the example of the word: JESTE [is]
Plato concluded that such words as
osia, usia, esia...are derived out of 
the name of Goddess Estia
And she was inscripted exactly like that 
in ancient artifacts
as you can see on your monitors
Plato said that "Estia" is a word of foreign origin
which means it belongs to 
the language of indigenous inhabitants
However, here is the catch we found only in Yugoslav translation of the text
In Oxford English translation from 1892
the term "foreign names" was used
In the Greek text from 1887
"xéna onómata" which also means: foreign names
However, just in Yugoslav translation from 1979
it was emphasized in a footnote
that these were "not really foreign names"
but "other dialects of Greek language"
It turned out, according to Yugoslav editors,
that speakers of Aeolic, Doric, Laconic or Cretan dialect were considered foreigners by Plato!
Such footnotes are not present in English or Greek version of the text
Which gives us only two potential conclusions:
1. That the mentioned footnote in Yugoslav version,
is an implanted falsification
2. That only Athenians are the real Greeks
while speakers of other dialects,
are in fact, native indigenous "barbarians"
who were assimilated...
...so Plato made a clear distinction 
and considered them no Greeks
Ancient Greek dialects, in early phases,
kept the indigenous form: ESTE (esti)
As an example, we will mention the archaic Aeolic dialect of Ancient Greek language
We will see that it is not by accident
that Plato referred to 
speakers of other Greek dialects as "foreigners"
Constantine Economos, 
in the second volume of his Dictionary,
quoted various Biblical texts
On your screen, you see Slavic text in left column and Aeolic dialect of Ancient Greek in the right column
You can see it again here, 
that this "dialect" is lot closer to our language
than it is to Ancient Greek language
and that it uses the same form of EST (jest)
as in our language
In contemporary Greek language, instead of EST (jest)
INE would be used
In Ancient Greek language existed
ESTI and ESTIN
which survived today as a term referring to "hearth"
This is important
because it relates to the cult of hearth
and SLAVA = ancestral and hearth cult celebrations among Serbs
Namely, the old Greek belief
coincides with Serbian
because the essence and purpose of existence
Serbs see in SLAVA [ancestral and hearth cult]
Goddess Estia [Jestija] is a Goddess of hearth
It is interesting, that this same Goddess
as the Goddess of hearth
was also found in Rome: 
as a protector of entire Rome
and far back in time when Rome was 
ruled by Rascians and Sabinians
The religious and linguistic similarity of
 Aeolians and Rascians /Serbs
can be further underlined if we explain 
Aeolian Islands
Some of the oldest inhabitants of Italy are inhabitants of Aeolian Islands
In Sicily, close to the city of Messina
or in Serbian accent: Mesi-na
Aeolian Islands are also called:
 Liparska Ostrva [Lipari Islands]
after the city of LIPARI
or Lipa-ri as Serbs would pronounce it
Lipari were settled after Trojan Wars, 
three thousand years ago
a place called Lipar we also find in Serbia
in Bačka region
"Lipar" is a place where linden [lipa] grows
As in a well known poem of Djrua Jakšić: "Na Liparu"
According to the First book of Herodotus' Histories, page 50
as well as according to Plato's "Cratylus"
Goddess Estia is of Pelast origin - a pre-Greek (indigenous) origin
By her name and her essence 
(as a Goddess of hearth)...
Estia belongs to 
religion and ethnology of our own ancestors
For the end of this episode
we have to say something about the names
The term "barbarian" or "barbar"
has a very negative connotation today
assuming wildness, savagery...
Let us first reveal the true meaning of the word "barbar"
before we proceed to deeper etymological analysis
Barbars or barbarians are people who live
 without visible social differences
In some kind of equality
That is something characteristic for every 
old civilization of Hum [Balkan]
Like numerous Illyrian tribes, especially Dalmats
But, we have to say, this story goes back to Vinča
Because Vinčan Civilization was mostly characterized
by the lack of visible social differences, 
in spite of the fact that...
...Vinča was a wealthy society 
and private ownership was honored
>> Dragan Janković - Vinča Museum Curator <<
We though that social diversification started 
with surplus of valuables
But, it was not like that
Through the entire second half of Neolit
we have surplus in valuables, 
private ownership and trade
But no social diversification!
Social diversification has started with an idea to live off someone else's work
and that idea was imposed with wars
Archaeological artifacts tell us that Dalmats
much later than Vinča though
also had no significant differences
 in property or social status
This same trait we find among Serbs and Slavs
which implies to the CONTINUITY of population
In spite of private ownership
there are no bigger differences in property
because inhabitants live in communities:
tribal, generic or familiar communities
characteristic for most of the indigenous tribes, 
the so called  Illyrian tribes
of Hum [Balkan] peninsula
To this day, the word "barabar" is being used
and it has several supplementary meanings
Foremost, it stands for people 
that have equal possessions
Also, "barabar" means "side by side" and "together"
Of course, what could you expect from 
official Serbian linguists
but, to classify this word as of Turkic origin!!!
That should not surprise us from mediocrities
who even dared to classify 
the word "kutija" [box] as Turkic
in spite the old Slavic word "kut" [corner] is in its root
However, the first, but not the only, word we will use to explain the word "barbar" and "barabar"
is our own Serb adverb "bar" [at least]
or "barem" [at least]
Simply speaking, the word "barbarians"
refers to people that have 
BAREM MALO [at least something]
The least [bar] needed for life
Among them, there were no slaves
just like among Serbs, Slavs and most of Illyrian tribes
as well as Vinčans - none of them had slaves
The mere word RAB [slave] in Serbian language
was often used in positive context
as RAB BOŽJI [servant of God]
or SORAB - which means "working companion"
someone who makes an effort out of love 
for God or loved ones
Our word BAR (barem) is not of Turkic origin
because, for example, the English word BARE or BARELY
as well as BAR in Danish or Norwegian language:
all have exactly the same meaning as in Serbian
And I really have to wonder
if Danes and Norwegians have 
such linguists as Serbian
to classify their own word BAR as Turkic word!
The true meaning and origin of the word BAR
we can further explain with the English word BARE
as would be an archaic pronunciation...
Today it would sound more like "WEAR"
and WEAR means to carry, dress-up...
This etymology was explained by Constantine Economos in his Dictionaries
through the word BREME [burden]
Burden is something that 
a man is able to put on himself
Bar-bar has so much he is able to put on himself!
So much he is able to carry
But in fact: so much as he needs!
Complete affirmation of this claim we find in Sanskrit...
where the word Bharabharin 
means exactly the same what I just said:
"the one who carries the burden"
Neither a slave, neither a rich man, but someone who has "at least a burden" [BAREM BREME]
Just enough he needs and as much he can carry
In deeper revelation of this etymology
Constantine Economos has contributed a lot
by pointing to our Serbian linguistic foundation
found in such words as:
SABOR [convocation]
SABIRAM, SABIRANJE [I add, addition]
BEREM, BRANJE [I pick, picking]
On the very end,
since in this episode, I did not provide numerous evidence of linguistic similarities
from the writings of Constantine Economos
I urge the viewers to write in the comments section
if you want me to 
make another episode on this topic
Today, we had our focus on Plato
and "Plato" was not the real name of this
 philosopher - but his nickname
The real name of Plato was ARISTOKLE
again reveals the traces of Serbian language
 in oldest layers of Ancient Greek language
ARISTO + KLE
means: "Ariston's knee"
a son of Ariston
Considering that Plato's father was called Ariston
The same is with some other Greek names
such as: HERA+KLE, PERI+KLE, SOFO+KLE
where KLE stands for "knee"
and "knee" stands for relative - son
In previous episodes I spoke a lot about
the consonant minimum K - L
so I will not reiterate here
I will remind the viewers that in the episodes 
focused on linguistics
But, also in the previously mentioned
 episode about Diocletia
I explained the name of Diocletian - exactly in this manner:
DIO+KLE = descendant of a divine giant [DIV]
Diokle is the son of divine giant or Div's knee
Serbs express kinship (descendance) 
with the word "knee"
So we say: first knee, second knee, third and so on
Beside that, I already have spoken in numerous episodes...
that in Rashan (Rascian) - Etrurian language
the words: KLE - KLEVA - KLEN
mean: KNEE - CRADLE - OFFSPRING
the event of birth
Something that Svetislav Bilbija 
wrote about in much detail
The fact about the real name of Plato: ARISTOKLE
Ariston's son - Ariston's knee
is the trustworthy and documented fact!
In this episode, we also confirmed that
the words DIOS and ZEUS originate from the word DIV (serbian DIVINE GIANT)
So, I invite you to watch our episode again:
"Serbs are Indigenous - One Word is the Proof"
By the way, the meaning of the name "Plato"
is PLET-j-AT [broad shouldered]
PLETJAT is the archaic form, 
the modern form is: PLEĆAT
This is connected with the words:
 PLOT, PLET, PLAT, PLAŠT
Which all have PL in their root
but we will elaborate it in some other episode
because our time is up for today
>> WE THANK ALL CONTRIBUTORS TO SRBIJA GLOBAL CHANNEL <<
