Hello flat-earthers of the world.
There's a lot of controversy regarding
solar eclipse on August 31st 2017,
that leads to the ultimate question:
is the heliocentric model correct? or wrong?
In this short video, collaborating with Soegianto Soelistiono,
a professional doctorate, majoring in computer physics,
and Najwa Az Zahra, a medical doctor,
founder of Indonesian Flat Earth Community,
We will use all scientific data to study
the Great American Eclipse.
The conclusions are quite devastating:
the speed is deceiving; the angle is wrong;
the path is impossible; and the moon's diameter is wrong
We all know that the sun and the moon
both rise in the east and set in the west.
In your flat earth, what you see is you get.
The Sun and the Moon are moving clockwise from east to west
As you know, in our flat earth,
if you are facing North wherever you are,
your left is the west and your right is the east.
Therefore if you fly straight from west
to east,
you will come back to your starting point.
And so do the sun and the
moon.
The other fact is
if a source of light moving in one direction passes an object,
the shadow will always move in opposite direction.
So as the Sun and the Moon are moving from east to west,
and the sun passes the moon,
the shadow is moving in opposite direction from west to east,
exactly like reality.
'Cause in our Flat Earth what you see is what you get.
Now, in the globe model,
in order to make the Sun and the Moon rise in the east and set in the West,
they have to make the globe model rotate from west to east.
In this way, the east side of the earth encounters the Sun earlier
than the west side of the earth.
Most of the time, the globe model can
accommodate almost everything from flat earth reality,
projected in different shapes, different sizes,
different distances and different speeds.
It's only mathematical assumptions.
They calculated one by one gradually and individually
within thousands of years.
It's all started 2,300 years ago,
when Aristarchus calculated the size and distance
of the moon using eclipses, based on assumptions if the earth was a ball.
From that assumptions, he calculated the size and distance of the Sun.
Then people adapted his method and assumptions to calculate the whole solar system.
Then the whole galaxy. And so on and so on.
Assumptions upon assumptions...
But sometimes,
when a bunch of mathematical assumptions mixed together
to explain rare cases like solar eclipse...
they just don't add up.
Many people argue whether the globe model
can make eclipse shadow from west to east, or not.
Let’s make it clear, once and for all.
If we put all the data on the table, transparently,
in a way that everyone can understand,
measure. and verify themselves,
the answer is YES and NO.
YES IF, and BUT NO.
Now the yes if first.
Yes eclipse shadow on the globe model
can move from west to east,
ONLY if moon’s orbital speed is faster than
earth’s rotation speed.
In heliocentric model, the moon’s orbital
speed is twice as fast as the earth’s rotation speed.
With this paradigm, for sure, the shadow will
move from west to east.
Let’s make a model to make it easier to
understand.
The distance is not to scale.
The moon should be 30 earth diameters away.
If the earth rotates 1,670 km in one hour
to your right,
and the moon orbits 3,686 km to your right
too,
then you draw a straight line from moon’s
diameter to the earth,
you will see the moon’s line is farther
than the earth’s line.
But of course 3,686 km is farther than 1,670 km.
You don’t even need a model to understand.
This is called LINEAR SPEED.
In this way, the eclipse shadow moves from west to east.
Because the moon is faster than the earth.
It’s mathematically correct, based on that
assumptions and paradigm.
But there’s a big problem.
It defies natural fact.
If the moon is faster than the earth’s rotation,
you would see the moon is setting to the East.
The opposite of reality.
Let’s use mooncalc.org to make it easier.
Find a place that has 90° elevation
of the moon.
Imagine the earth is moving 1,670 km/h,
west to east, to your right
and the moon is moving 3,683 km/h to the same direction
within one hour, you would see the moon is
more to your right,
because it’s faster and travels more distance
than the earth, right?
WRONG.
See what happens if you add time for one hour.
Ooh the moon is going to your left, because the earth is rotating faster.
How come 1,670 km/h travels faster than 3,683 km/h?
It’s because the distance traveled by the
moon is 60x longer than earth’s circumference.
Now we are talking about the other kind of speed, the ANGULAR SPEED.
Take bicycle wheel as an example of angular speed.
The farthest part from the axis, the tyre,
is moving faster than the axis.
But actually it’s the same angular speed.
The farther from the axis, the faster it moves, but actually the same angular speed.
Now, the earth is rotating 360° in
24 hours.
It means 15°/hour.
If the earth is moving 15° counterclockwise,
to your right,
and according to heliocentrism the sun is
at rest,
then you will see the sun appears to be setting 15° to your left.
That’s the angular speed of the sun, due
to earth’s rotation.
Okay?
While the moon is orbitting the earth 360°
in 29.5 days.
Some people like to say 27.3 days, sidereal
month.
The moon’s position with respect to the
stars.
It’s irrelevant.
For we are counting moon’s position with
respect to the earth, nothing to do with the stars.
So we have to use synodic month, average 29.5 days.
The angular speed of moon’s orbit is 1 / 24
hours / 29.5 days x 360°, equals to
0.51°/hour.
That means, when the earth in an hour is rotating 15° to your right,
making the sun appears to be setting to your left 15°,
the moon is moving 0.51° to your right.
That makes the moon appears to be slower than the earth’s rotation.
Let’s go back to mooncalc.org.
The moon’s elevation angle is 90°.
Then change the time to one hour later.
Now you see the elevation is subtracted to
75.81°.
75° because the earth is rotating 15° from
previous 90° elevation.
0.81° is the moon’s traveling distance
in one hour.
Mooncalc is using different moon distance on that day.
Or perhaps they’re using sidereal month.
It’s all mathematical assumptions.
They don’t even look to the sky.
The moon moves 0.51° against the earth
moves 15° per hour.
With this assumptions and paradigm,
for sure, the eclipse shadow moves from east to west.
The opposite of reality.
So, which one applies to the moon and the
earth’s speeds that creates eclipse shadow?
Linear speed?
Or angular speed?
They will say that it’s the linear speed
that matters.
WRONG.
Even if you’re at the moon, in 1 hour
you would see the earth is setting 0.51° to your left,
while it’s rotating 15° to your right.
Even if you’re looking from the moon, the
earth’s rotation is still faster.
That means, eclipse shadow in the globe model
goes from East to West,
the opposite of reality.
Perhaps other people would say,
“Oh… the moon is slower than the earth,
but the shadow moves faster.
That makes the shadow moves from west to east”.
Well, this sounds plausible, in theory.
But if you put the data, it’s not correct.
The sun is 400x bigger than the moon.
The moon’s traveling distance for 5 hours
is just like a dot to the heliocentric sun.
If the moon moves in 5 hours, 18,415 km, it
only makes 0.006989959° difference.
If the moon moves 18,415 km to the right side of the sun
the shadow’s distance on earth is 18,460
km.
Almost the same with the distance traveled by the moon.
Science says eclipse shadow moves at the same speed with the moon
and the eclipse shadow path is the same length
with the distance traveled by the moon.
So, if someone says the moon is slower than
the earth, but the shadow moves faster to
make shadow from west to east…
it’s debunked by their own science.
Another possibility, other people would say,
“The earth is also orbiting the sun.
That makes the shadow moves from west to east”.
Again, a plausible theory, if you don’t
do the math.
How come the earth that’s rotating at 1,670 km to your right,
and the moon is 384,000 km away orbiting the earth at 3,683 km/h,
and the sun is 149.6 million km from the earth,
while the earth is orbiting the sun at 110,000 km/h,
it’s almost 100x faster than the speed of sound,
plus the sun is also moving at 72,000 km/h,
almost 60x faster than the speed of sound,
can create eclipse shadow 18,415 km on earth within 5 hours.
Do the math.
Do it yourself.
They never include the earth’s orbit in
calculating eclipses,
because they assume the moon is always attached
with the earth, wherever it goes.
In most solar system animations that you usually
see, the sun is at rest.
This is heliocentric.
The sun is the center of the universe.
But later they knew it’s impossible.
They say, the sun is also moving at 72,000
km/h across the space.
Another mathematical assumptions on paper,
without experiment.
They never put them all together when calculating
eclipses.
This is very important information.
Most people think that NASA can predict eclipses accurately,
that they have very advanced knowledge,
therefore it proves that heliocentric is true.
Unfortunately, that’s not the case.
All eclipse predictions provided by NASA,
including this 5 millenium, 5000 years of eclipses,
are using Saros Cycle, invented by Ancient Babylonians thousands of years ago.
Both solar and lunar eclipses are so predictable,
because they always repeat in a cycle of 18 years 11 days and 8 hours.
It’s called Saros Cycle and it has nothing
to do with heliocentric.
Ancient Babylonians believed the earth is
flat,
the sun and the moon are revolving around
the earth,
and so do the stars and other celestial bodies.
They didn’t calculate the distances, sizes
and speeds based on
false assumptions and speculations like heliocentric
teachings.
They simply observed the sky, and took whatever it is.
With that paradigm, they can predict eclipses accurately.
Such predictions are impossible to be done
using heliocentric model.
In its 5 millenium catalog of solar and lunar
eclipses,
NASA wrote that all eclipse calculations are
by Fred Espenak, a retired NASA’s employee.
NASA never calculated and predicted eclipses
using heliocentric model.
They simply hire the best Saros researcher,
their retired employee, Fred Espenak,
to calculate and predict eclipses using Ancient Babylonian’s method
that has nothing to do with heliocentric.
NASA even wrote that Fred Espenak is responsible for the accuracy
of those 5000 years catalog of eclipses.
For thousands of years, some astronomers collected
eclipse cycle all around the world
based on Saros Cycle.
They have started to do this long time before NASA was established in 1958.
Astronomer like Fred Espenak simply collected
eclipse database from other local astronomers
all around the world.
As you see in this table, it’s made by other
astronomer, G. van den Bergh, in 1955.
That’s what Fred Espenak did.
He is a very good Saros researcher.
Why would NASA need Saros Cycle, if they can
calculate eclipses using heliocentric math?
Obviously because they can’t.
A bunch of mathematical assumptions, when
combined together to calculate eclipses,
they just don’t add up.
There is an interesting review from Matt Parker,
from standupmaths channel.
He is the only person who got prestigious
title as London Mathematical Society Popular Lecturer.
A smart and articulative mathematician.
Here’s what we said about predicting eclipses
using heliocentric math.
Some thick heads still don’t understand
why NASA uses Saros Cycle to predict eclipses.
They say, “There are a lot of software predicting
eclipses using heliocentric math.
You can download free software Stellarium.
It can predicts eclipses”.
Well… if a free software can predict eclipses with heliocentric model,
then why NASA with USD 19 billion budget/year
can’t predict eclipses using heliocentric
model?
Which one makes more sense to you?
All astronomy software are using eclipse database
from NASA,
it’s not the other way around.
After NASA published this 5 millenium catalog
of solar and lunar eclipses,
people use the database to make animation
using whatever model they want.
Just put one eclipse time to anoher,
the software will automatically adjust
to make those two eclipses happen as programmed.
It’s not the other way around.
After you get eclipse database, you can make
animation with square earth if you like.
You can put whatever distance, whatever size,
the software will adjust
in accordance with the eclipse dates.
Some thick heads even try to run from reality,
by saying NASA provides a software in its
web site to predict eclipses.
Look at this database used by NASA.
5000 years catalog of solar eclipses database.
You can choose what year, what eclipse type,
duration, and…
oopss it’s Saros cycle.
Not heliocentric math.
This is the 3D movement of their heliocentric
model.
The sizes, distances and speeds are not to
scale.
This is just to make you have an idea of the
true heliocentric concept.
The question is... how could NASA 48 years
ago
kept up with the earth’s orbital speed,
almost 100x faster than the speed of sound,
and also kept up with the sun’s speed across
the space,
at almost 60x faster than the speed of sound?
That’s just a warming up.
In the next section, you will see scientific
facts based on official data,
that eclipse in the globe model is a real
fantasy.
Scientific data that everybody can verify
and do experiment themselves
as referred to as “Scientific Method”.
With this official scientific data, you will
get the undebunkable result,
that eclipses completely fail to work on the
globe model.
The data is always there all the time.
You just didn’t realize what it means.
Stay tuned.
Let’s take a look at their official data,
taken from NASA’s web site.
The Great American Eclipse path.
NASA also provides external link for more
details.
This is a picture that destroys globe model,
if you understand what it means.
First, let’s find out the eclipse duration,
that began at the far West and ended at the far East.
We’re not looking for eclipse beginning
and ending in one location,
as there are so many locations.
What we’re looking is the beginning and
ending of the whole eclipse
happened on that day.
You just click the path, and they give you
complete informations.
See the “start of partial eclipse”.
It’s 15.55 UTC.
Then the “end of partial eclipse”.
20.55 UTC.
Now we have credible data, that total eclipse
duration is 5 hours.
Secondly, how far is that eclipse length?
Take a look at the longitudes.
It’s started at 171.2° west, and ended at 27.4° west.
The eclipse length longitude is 143.7°.
Do you realize how far is 143.7° in a globe?
Let’s copy paste some coordinates from the
eclipse site to google maps,
to measure the approximate distance.
It’s around 14,000 km.
Now, apply it to the globe map.
See? the eclipse distance,
143.7° is already 40% of the earth circumference.
So, within 5 hours of eclipse, out of 24 hours
a day, or around 20% of the day,
somehow, miraculously, the shadow length covers
40% of the globe.
Let’s make a scale model now, to understand
that eclipse length of 143.7°
is mathematically and geomatrically impossible.
We’ve made scale model of the eclipse using AutoCAD.
In this video, I’m collaborating with many people
from Flat Earth 101 Community.
You have seen the work of Najwa and Anggoro Aji, specially made for you.
For this AutoCAD, I want to make it as precise as possible.
So I collaborate with people from the community
again.
This time with Tedjo.
He is a successful architect who is very familiar
with AutoCAD.
And he is not alone.
People in his office also helped us to make
this model.
They are flat earthers, too.
These are the assumptions I took from mainstream
science database.
We made this model based on that official
data, at that particular date, and that particular
spot as referred by NASA.
Let’s start with the earth.
Of course we can make it pretty with 3D earth,
but that’s not our objective now.
It’s not about beauty.
It’s about precision.
The earth radius and diameter are precise
according to heliocentric data.
These 5 lines represent the earth’s rotation
for 5 hours, the eclipse duration.
Each line represents 15°.
5 lines equal to 75°.
The zero point represents the first second
of the eclipse.
The earth rotates to your left, anticlockwise,
from west to east.
So if you are standing over here at 0 point,
in 5 hours you will be over there.
Now let’s go to the moon.
It’s 30 earth diameters away.
The earth is a small circle over here, and
the moon is over there.
Let’s zoom it.
This is the moon at zero point, when the first
second of partial eclipse started.
These 5 moons represent its movements every
hour.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 hours.
This is the moon’s radius and diameter,
according to standard heliocentric.
This is the moon’s traveling distance every
hour.
Within 5 hours it travels 18,415 km.
That’s the linear speed.
But the orbit is so big, 29.5 days, and 5
hours means almost nothing.
So if you draw line from the moon’s axis
to the earth’s axis,
this 18,415 km is only 2.55° angular
speed on earth.
It’s hard to see at this true scale.
Let’s split it into two screens.
The moon on your left side, the earth on your
right side.
This is the zero point, when the first partial
eclipse happened.
The line goes to zero point on earth.
In 5 hours, the moon will be over there.
If you’re standing on earth over here, 5
hours later you will rotate from west to east,
and you’ll be over here.
You will see the moon is setting to the west,
due to earth’s rotation.
Exactly like you’ve seen at mooncalc.
You add time, the moon goes to the west,
and the elevation angle is subtracted from 90°
to around 75° in one hour.
For 5 hours, it would be around 18° near
the horizon, almost setting.
This is the proof that it’s the angular
speed that applies.
What about the linear speed?
After 5 hours, moon’s position is over here.
We draw straight linear lines from the moon.
Where do the lines fall on earth?
Man… it’s far outside the earth.
Theoretically, linear speed is wrong.
After 5 hours, you would see the moon is setting
to the west.
In reality, you don’t see the moon is over here,
like it’s setting to your east.
The moon is over there, near horizon in the
west.
The funny thing is, even though the moon is
over here setting in the east,
the shadow will fall outside the earth.
If you use angular speed, eclipse shadow
moves from east to west, the opposite of reality.
If you’re using linear speed, the moon sets
in the east,
and the shadow falls outside the earth after a few hours.
Any which way, they’re wrong.
It really doesn’t work on the globe model.
What about the shadow speed?
We’ve been through this.
Their own science says the eclipse speed is
the same as the moon’s speed itself.
Look once again at their eclipse shadow speed.
The shadow is never faster than the moon’s speed,
Poor globe model.
Let’s be generous to them.
Give the globe model a generous discount.
Let’s start not from 90° elevation, but
instead from 0°
like you have solar eclipse at 6 am in the
morning.
You can’t even see the sun at horizon level.
Then you have 5 hours eclipse.
And still, if using linear speed, the shadow
goes outside the earth.
Do you know why it fails?
Because, you can’t get 5 hours eclipse on
the globe model.
The moon would travel 18,415 km while earth
diameter is only 12,742 km.
That would make the moon half earth outside
the earth.
This is real fantasy, folks.
Congratulaton…
Based on their official data, you just found
a fatal error on the globe model.
Now let’s see the eclipse movement with
3D model.
You can use Solar System Scope.
It supposed to be correct according to heliocentric model.
The time, speeds, directions and eclipse duration
are to scale.
Only the sizes are not to scale, they make
them bigger
to make it easier to see the movements.
Set your time to August 21, 2017 at 3.55 pm
UTC.
We’ll run it for 5 hours, scaled to about
5 seconds.
It’s gonna be quick, but we can replay it.
The time will be 3.55 pm to 8.55 pm.
Please focus on the earth rotation speed and
direction,
also the moon’s orbital speed and direction.
See which one is faster.
Ready?
Go.
You see that the earth’s rotation
is faster.
Let’s zoom it.
The moon is almost like not moving.
That means they’re using angular speed.
The earth’s rotating at 15°/hour, the moon’s
traveling at 0.51°/hour.
With this angular speed, to which direction
the shadow goes?
Because the earth is spinning faster to the
east,
the moon’s shadow goes the opposite direction,
from east to west.
Exactly like Najwa has shown you, only this
3D animation is using
true scale of speeds according to heliocentrism.
But don’t trust CGI cartoons.
Let’s make a real life model now.
This time I collaborate with Pupung.
He is a technical engineer.
A very dilligent researcher.
He made our previous AutoCAD scale model into
real life model.
This is the earth and the moon’s model to
scale.
This is the moon’s traveling distance in
5 hours.
And this is the earth’s rotation in 5 hours
too.
This is the earth-moon distance.
You remember those angular lines.
The moon travels 18,415 km, but it’s only
2.55° from the earth’s axis.
That’s the true sizes, distances and speeds
according to helicentric model.
Assisted by Damar as cameraman, we put 3 cameras
on the model.
First one is above the earth, to see the earth’s
rotation angles.
Second camera is above the moon, to see the
moon’s traveling distance and angles.
Third one is behind the moon, to see where
the shadow falls in 5 hours time scale.
Remember we’re not looking for the eclipse
shadow size.
The source of light with this scale should
be 475 m, or almost half km away.
And the lamp diameter should be 4.36 m.
It’s irrelevant for this purpose,
coz we’re just looking at the shadow’s
direction, not the shadow’s size.
We start from the zero point, where the eclipse starts.
You see the earth is at 0° position, and
the moon is also at at 0° position.
The shadow is slightly to the west of the
earth,
because the eclipse started at 15.55 UTC or
10.55 local time in the morning.
If you stand on that shadow point on earth,
you would see the moon is slightly to the east
where the moon rises as appears on earth.
Now the earth rotates for 15°,
the moon is moving 3,683 km but only 0.51°
from earth’s axis.
See where the shadow falls.
Oopss.. it’s not angular speed, but linear
speed.
This is a disaster for the globe model.
Yes it means the shadow moves from west to
east,
but it means the moon is setting to the east,
and within 3 hours, the shadow will go outside the earth.
2nd hour.
3rd hour.
You see the shadow already falls outside the
earth.
4th hour.
It’s more than earth diameter.
This is the 5th hour.
The shadow goes half earth outside the earth.
How can heliocentrism predict eclipses, if
the maths don’t even add up for 1 eclipse?
No wonder NASA still use Ancient Babylonian’s
Saros Cycle.
Let’s take a look at who are these Babylonians
who invented Saros Cycle?
Babylonians are descendants of Sumerian,
the first modern human civilization 6000 years ago.
Earlier than Ancient Egypts.
It’s located in Mesopotamia, or modern-day
Syria and Iraq.
The birthplace of Abraham, the father of 3
religions: Hebrew, Christian, and Islam.
It’s the cradle of civilization.
Their inventions and achievements are still
being used today.
Almost everything, except internet and cable tv.
They are very smart people.
Their alphabets, cuneiform, consists of 400 characters.
Not 26 characters ABCD like us.
Their numeral system is Sexagesimal or base 60.
Not base 10 like us.
Sexagesimal is very good for counting big
numbers and small numbers.
Still used today for measuring time, angles
and geographic coordinates.
They are the one who invented 360° in a circle.
Do you know why there are 360° in a circle?
It’s the average days of the sun and the
moon circling the earth in a year.
The sun is circling the earth in 365.2425
days,
and the moon is circling the earth in 354.3829
days.
Add those numbers, you will get 719.62 days.
So the average of the lunar and solar days
in a year is 359.8 days, rounding to 360 days.
That’s where Babylonians got the idea of
360° in a circle,
and got sexagesimal numeric system base 60.
It’s really natural science.
They are the one who invented lunar calendar.
Synodic month, the real astronomical event.
The beginning and ending of each month is
based on moon phases.
Hence the name, month.
That’s natural science.
On the other hand, modern-day solar calendar
system is based on nothing.
If you want to make solar calender based on
natural phenomena,
the new year should be either summer Jun 22,
autumn Sep 23,
winter Dec 22, or spring Mar 21.
But solar calendar starts with January the
1st, which means nothing.
And ends with December 31st, which also means
nothing.
It’s not really solar calendar.
And every dates of the month has nothing to
do with the moon.
You’re using a wrong calendar system.
Yet, Babylonians were aware of solar cycle
too.
So they invented the so-called lunisolar calendar.
It's lunar calender year consists of 12 months,
the closest lunar cycle with solar cycle in a year.
They are the one who invented 7 days in a week.
They observed the stars are moving in the same
direction and the same speed.
Except, there are 7 sky objects that move
differently.
They call it the "Seven Wandering Stars".
Later, by Ancient Greeks is called planetes.
That’s the origin of the word “planet”.
Planet is not a ball that living creatures
can live on it,
like you always see in CGI cartoons published
by NASA.
Planet is a wandering star.
A star which has its own path and speed circling
the earth.
Those 7 wandering stars, or 7 planets of the
earth are:
Then Babylonians devoted 7 days every week
to honor those 7 wandering stars.
The first day, to honor the Sun.
Hence the name: SUN-day.
Second day to honor the Moon.
MON-day.
Third day is for Mars, or in Nordic is called
Tyr.
TUES-day.
Fourth day for Mercury.
Mercredi in French.
In German and Dutch is called Odin or Woden.
WEDNES-day.
Fifth day for Jupiter.
Jueves in Spanish.
It’s Nordic god Thor.
THURS-day.
Sixth day to honor Venus.
Viernes in Spanish.
It’s Nordic god of Frigg.
FRI-day.
The seventh day to honor Saturn.
SATUR-day.
That’s the influence of Babylonian culture.
We still use it until now.
Babylonians are the ones who invented the
concept of clock.
The sundial.
Then they divided a day by 12 hours daytime
and 12 hours night time.
Where did they got the number 12?
Of course...
It’s the 12 zodiac constellations in a year.
And it takes 12 lunar cycles or months for
the sun to return to its original position.
Like every other celestial bodies circling
the earth in a certain cycle,
Babylonians observed that solar and lunar
eclipses happen
in a cycle of 18 years, 11 days and 8 hours.
That’s the only way to predict eclipses.
Nothing to do with heliocentric speeds and
distances.
Babylonians were using lunar calendar.
They knew that solar eclipses always happen
in new moon,
and lunar eclipses always happen in full moon.
They knew well that during solar eclipses,
the moon’s position is at the nearest point
to the sun.
Yet they never thought it’s the moon that
eclipsing the sun.
This is very interesting.
Since kids we’ve been told and educated
in schools
that solar eclipses are caused by the moon,
and moon eclipses are caused by the ball earth’s shadow
A theory without any single proof, but taught
in schools like a fact.
Babylonians, however, observed the sky much
more often
and more careful than us.
They didn’t have internet and cable tv,
or social media to chat.
They had the luxury of time to live in harmony
with nature.
Why didn’t they think it’s the moon that
eclipsing the sun?
First, because they knew there are so many
unseen celestial bodies in the sky.
Second, because they knew the moon is behind
the sun.
If the moon is in front of the sun,
you would see the moon is getting close to
the sun before eclipses, right?
But you never see it.
Let’s use our logics here.
Why can’t you see the stars during daytime?
Because the sun is too bright, right?
And because the stars are behind the sun.
There’s no star between the sun and the
earth even according to heliocentrism.
All stars are behind the sun, the sun is very
bright at daytime,
therefore you can’t see the stars during
daytime.
But the moon is 400x closer than the sun,
according to heliocentrism.
The moon is between the earth and the sun
when it’s new moon,
and it’s behind the earth when it’s full
moon.
Sometimes you can see the moon very clear
in the morning.
So why can’t you see the moon when it’s
new moon?
Because the sun is too bright?
Hell no…
You can see every single objects in front
of the sun during daytime.
You can see the clouds, airplanes, birds,
etc.
Sometimes you can see the moon in the sunlight.
So why can't you see the moon when it's a new moon?
Because the moon is in an unseen position?
No it’s not correct, either.
Even in heliocentrism, the moon is near the
sun during the new moon.
So why you never see the moon when it’s
new moon?
Because the moon is behind the sun at the
time of the new moon.
Third, Babylonians who invented Saros Cycle
never thought the sun is eclipsed by the moon,
because they knew the moon’s body can’t
eclipse the sun.
Ancient people were aware of many unidentified
celestial bodies
that sometimes can be seen with naked eyes.
Only a dark celestial body can eclipse the
sun, “out of nowhere”.
Just like lunar eclipses are caused by other
celestial body,
so are solar eclipses.
Babylonians called it “the Planet of Crossing”.
Planet X, Dark Sun, if you will.
And so do every cultures in the world.
In India, they call it Rahu and Ketu.
In Java, Indonesia, they call it Batara Kala.
Not because ancient people are stupid, but
because they really used their senses.
Their senses told them it’s not the moon eclipsing the sun.
It’s a dark sky object that can absorb light.
And it’s not the earth’s shadow that eclipse
the moon, either.
It’s a similar dark sky object.
And you know what, they didn’t just make
theories.
They calculated the cycle of these dark objects,
so accurate we still use today.
Saros Cycle.
On the other hand, you don’t use your own
eyes and your own senses.
You just follow what NASA told you.
This is just to open your mind.
The world is not like they told you.
There are so many anomalies in eclipses.
You can study the shadow, using real life
scale model.
I have tried with Pupung.
We’re using real sunlight, no question about
brightness, lumens and so on.
But don’t do it in open air, coz the bigger
the light, the smaller the shadow.
In total solar eclipses, the source of light
should be the same
with the object that eclipse it.
Using scale model, for a 10 cm earth, you
have to use a 2.92 m of pipe.
This is very important to make the source
of light to scale.
The result is quite devastating, the shadow
is about 16x bigger than it should be.
In reality, eclipse shadow size is about 70
miles or around 100 km.
They make it in CGI cartoons, as if a 3,474
km of moon,
from 384,000 km distance, can make a 100 km
of shadow.
So they make CGI cartoons with shadow shape
like a pencil.
It doesn’t exist in reality.
With real life scale model, the shadow is
actually 1000 miles or 1600 km.
With the globe model, eclipse shadow would
cover
the whole Kalimantan island, unbelievable...
With the globe model to scale, eclipse shadow
would be so big
that can cover Portugal, Spain and France
at once.
This is a disaster for the globe model.
All your life you only see eclipses of fantasy.
On the other hand, in the flat earth model,
the diameters of the sun,
the moon or whatever object eclipsing the
sun
is about 32 Nautical Miles or around 60 km.
If you don’t like mathematics, you can use
AutoCAD,
a neutral software for professionals.
You can verify by yourself, from 5,000 km
height,
they will make shadow size exactly like reality,
105.7 km like the real eclipse shadow in Idaho Falls
Look at the eclipse shadow’s speed.
Umbra velocity is 1,874 mph, or 3,015 km/h.
Their science says eclipse shadow speed is
the same as the moon’s speed.
Because heliocentric sun is 400x bigger than
the moon,
so 5 hours movement of the moon means nothing.
Only makes 0.006989959° difference.
If you like mathematics, you can verify yourself.
Therefore they say that the eclipse shadow
moves
at the same speed as the moon itself.
It’s mathematically correct with that assumptions,
but it doesn’t fit with reality.
The moon travels at 3,683 km, making shadow
on earth that spins at 1,670 km.
Both to the same direction, from west to east.
The shadow should move at 2,013 km/h.
But look at the reality.
It moves at 3,015 km/h.
It doesn’t add up.
You can also study the eclipse pattern.
How can the earth, the sun and the moon creating
such zig zag pattern.
Look carefully, the path even goes slightly
below earth curvature.
As NASA wrote in its official data, it’s
a “geocentric coordinate”.
What does it mean?
Geocentric coordinate is geographic coordinate
system
in which the earth is modeled as a sphere
or spheroid
in a right-handed XYZ like 3D in autoCAD.
That means, originally the coordinate is in
a flat map,
then projected into the earth globe model.
In fact, all globe maps that you’ve seen
in your entire life
is a geocentric coordinate, or a projection
from a flat map to a globe map.
Last but certainly not least is the one that
we have discussed.
Most people don’t notice that the eclipse
duration was 5 hours,
and don’t realize what it means.
This is the reason why I make this episode
in English,
to share that this kind of eclipse is
mathematically and geomatrically impossible
on the globe model.
Please don’t use 3D animation model.
You can make Superman spinning the earth backward
with CGI.
Please use real life scale model.
The shadow will go outside the globe after
3 hours.
You can take it from here, and bring it to
another level.
I heard some people say, why proving the globe
model is wrong?
Why not proving the flat earth model is right?
Well, we’re not supposed to make theories.
It’s not even our task.
Before you start to ask questions about flat
earth,
you have to understand what’s wrong with
the globe model first.
Like wise men say: if it ain’t broke, don’t
fix it.
But the bigger question is, why is it important
to you?
If we’re discussing about theories, it’s
okay to be wrong.
It won’t cost you money if flat earth is
wrong.
On personal level, it doesn’t matter
whether you believe the earth is square or triangle.
It only matters in social level.
Because if heliocentric model is wrong,
that means there are trillion dollars scandal
in the last 60 years.
That means space programs and satellites are
hoax.
Your communication costs should not be this
high.
Your national debt should not be that
high.
Most people don’t realize, or don’t want
to realize,
about their national debts.
The world owes USD 68.7 trillion
Do you know how much money in circulation
in the whole world?
You have to look at the physical currency,
the most liquid asset class, ofwhich all central
banks pay attention.
It’s only USD 7.6 trillion.
The world owes USD 68.7 trillion, while the
world only has USD 7.6 trillion.
It’s a debt you can never pay, ever!
To whom the world owes that much?
99% people in the world owes to the 1% population.
If you still don’t believe the Global Elites
exist,
you better listen to the Minister of Finance
of Indonesia,
a very smart and charming lady, former Managing Director of The WorldBank Group.
How come a very small group of people
can make the others owe to them, without even knowing it?
Central banks in the US and Europe are privately
owned corporations,
with the monopoly on creating money, but with
no accountability.
Those financial elites control all central
banks in the world
through the WorldBank, IMF and their elite
financial agents.
The system is quite symple.
All countries in the world have to face budget
deficits every year.
Then all governments have to issue bonds.
Then the financial elites finance the bonds
by creating money from thin air,
because they have monopoly on creating money.
Then all governments collect taxes from the
people to pay the interests.
Next year all governments face deficit again.
And the neverending cycle continues.
The global elites have to create deficits
in all national budgets.
The biggest four deficit makers are:
wars,
terrorism, financial crisis bailouts,
and space program hoax, including satellite
hoax.
Those are the parasites that eat your stomach
from the inside.
That’s what you have to pay from your taxes.
Globe earth hoax is the weakest link in their
systems.
You hit it right, the whole system will collapse.
Meanwhile, flat earth awakening gets the momentum
all over the world.
Indonesia is still the no. 1 flat earth topic in the world,
according to Google Trends.
People gather by themselves and make the Flat
Earth 101 Community.
It’s from the grassroots, bottom-up.
I didn’t create them.
On September 23rd, when the Sun has its culmination
at the equator in Pontianak, Indonesia,
Flat Earth 101 Community in all 34 provinces
made a National Movement
to measure the Sun distance in different locations.
People from neighboring countries,
Singapore, Malaysia,and Australia also participated this event.
The result of this research has been presented
in scientific journal format.
On October 28th, FE101 Community made the
second National Movement.
People in 34 provinces turned on
mini Tesla coil wireless lamps.
To all Flat Earth 101 Community who participated
this awesome National Movement,
thank you very much for your contribution.
God bless you all, may God be with all of
us.
It’s not only about energy saving, but it’s
a symbol of hope.
There are many technologies that can save your money,
but supressed by the global elites.
You’re not supposed to live in a world with
expensive electricity,
expensive gasoline, expensive telecommunication
using satellite scam.
You’re not supposed to live in violent wars
and terrorism
designed by the elites to make your national
budgets face deficits.
You’re not supposed to be industrial slaves,
stressful life to pay your bills,
and pay taxes to repay debts to super wealthy
financial elites
that has the monopoly on printing money from
thin air,
without any gold backup.
You deserve to live in a better world,
live in harmony with nature,
smiling faces everywhere,
with inner happiness in your heart.
That’s what flat earth awakening is all
about.
See you in the next episode.
Feel free to give your thoughts on the polls,
should I make next episodes
in English with Indonesian subtitle like this,
or in Indonesian with English subtitle,
or just in Indonesian without English translation.
Thanks for watching this channel.
Salam People Power.
