Hey There! Welcome To Life Noggin!
With temperatures rising, forests being destroyed
and oceans polluted, we need a clean energy source
that wont cause more damage to our fragile planet
as you probably know, there is a lot of debate on which energy source is the best.
The perfect energy source would be efficient,
safe, cheap, clean, and there’d be lots
of it.
So, using those criteria, let’s take a look
at some of the commonly used energy sources
to see how they all stack up.
The most recent data available from the US ENERGY ADMINISTRATION
reports that of all the energy used around the globe in 2017, 33% came from petroleum, 27% from coal, 23%
from natural gas. 13% from renewables and 4% from nuclear fission.
Non-renewables like natural gas and coal release
crazy amounts of greenhouse gases and pollutants,
so in terms of cleanliness, they’re out.
Nuclear produces radioactive material, which
we definitely don’t want.
After looking at renewables, hydroelectric
and wind power are the cleanest sources of
energy, producing very little to no emissions
or impact on the environment.
We also want an energy source that won’t
break the bank.
Wind is in the lead here too, costing just
$45 per megawatt-hour, with natural gas coming
in at $87, coal $102, and nuclear $172.
While rooftop solar panels aren’t very cost-effective,
energy from large-scale, utility panels now
only costs about $60 per megawatt-hour. So, not bad!
The sun is pretty much screaming at us with energy, so we have to figure something out.
Energy source efficiency is commonly measured
using something called heat rate, which factors
in the amount of fuel needed to generate power.
Since non-renewables like coal, petroleum,
nuclear and natural gas are using finite resources,
this efficiency is pretty important.
Of those, natural gas is, by far, the least
efficient, with petroleum, nuclear and coal
all being pretty equal.
But when it comes to renewables, there unfortunately
isn’t one measurement that allows us to
compare their efficiencies since their power
comes from different sources.
What about safety?
Each energy source has its own hazards.
Non-renewable plants have big risks like oil
rig explosions or mine collapses, but renewables
have their own dangers too.
Solar workers are exposed to carcinogens.
Biofuels like ethanol and biodiesel are highly
reactive and combustible.
Geothermal workers inhale deadly particles.
And while wind turbines are subject to collapsing
and natural events like lightning strikes
and fires, it appears that wind is the safest.
Then, there’s the importance of availability.
No matter how great an energy source may be,
if we don’t have a lot of it, what’s the
point?
Natural gas, petroleum and coal will run out.
And there isn’t always wind, sun or rain.
But, nuclear power industries are currently
exploring whether extracting uranium from
seawater could result in a virtually limitless
supply of nuclear energy.
There’s also some promising tech on the
horizon for the availability and longevity
of renewables too.
Lithium-ion batteries.
They’ve got a long lifespan, can hold crazy
amounts of energy, and their cost is dropping.
So pairing these with renewable energy generators
across the world could make clean energy even
more tempting.
It seems to me that wind energy is our best
option.
We’ll just need to learn to live with those
ugly wind turbines, which is a small price
to pay, for ya know, humans living longer
Would you be on board for a wind-powered world? Do you think solar is the way to go?
Let us know in the comment section below, or tell us, what should we talk about next?
Let's say we do have to get off this planet, how could we create our very own?
Check out this video!
We'd want it to be in the habitable zone. Meaning the planet should have an
orbit the right distance from it's star, to insure optimal temperatures and most importantly, liquid water.
As always, my name is Blocko!
This has been Life Noggin!
Don't forget to keep on thinking!
