A
A NEW
A NEW STATE
A NEW STATE LAW
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY
A NEW STATE LAW THAT'S SUPPOSED
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR
TO COMPENSATE THE WRONGLY
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE.
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT
CONVICTED HAS YET TO PAY OUT
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW
ANY MONEY SO FAR SO FAR NOT
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A
HELPING ANYONE. SO TONIGHT 13
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON
INVESTIGATES SHOWS YOU HOW SOME
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE.
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR
PEOPLE EXONERATED OF A CRIME
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY
ARE STILL WAITING ON THE
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL
STATE'S PROMISE. OUR SANDRA
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL
CHAPMAN EXPLAINS WHY VICTIMS
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN.
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE
OF LEGAL MISTAKES FEEL LIKE
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON,
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY
THEY'RE FACING TRIAL ALL OVER
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS.
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE
AGAIN. THEY WERE ONCE CONVICTED
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM
OF DEADLY ARSON, ROBBERY AND
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO
MURDERS. NOW CHRISTINE BUNCH.
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF
KEITH GOOPER AND DAVID CAMM ARE
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION.
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT
ALL FREE EXONERATED TO BUILD
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED
NEW LIVES AFTER THE SCORES OF A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST
WRONGFUL CONVICTION. BUT 13
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE
INVESTIGATES HAS DISCOVERED A
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT
NEW STATE LAW PASSED LAST YEAR
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW.
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE
TO COMPENSATE THOSE WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED
CONVICTED HAS NOT PAID OUT ONE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED
DIME UNDER THE LAW. THOSE WHO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH
HAVE HAD CONVICTIONS TOSSED OR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY
OVERTURNED ARE ENTITLED TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE.
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE
50000 DOLLARS FOR EACH YEAR
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH.
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE
OF INCARCERATION IF THEY AGREE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE
NOT TO SUE. BUT THERE IS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT
ANOTHER BIG CATCH. THE INDIANA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE GETS
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT
TO DECIDE WHO'S INNOCENT AND
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK
ULTIMATELY WHO'S ELIGIBLE. EACH
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND
CASE FACES A STRINGENT REVIEW.
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN
THEY'RE GOING TO TALK TO
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN
EVERYONE THAT OPPOSE ME AND GET
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL
THEIR OPINION TO WEIGH IN TOO.
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT
AND THEN ULTIMATELY WHEN THE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT.
DECISION COMES DOWN IT WILL BE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO
BASED ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME
BELIEVE I'M INNOCENT. THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC.
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT
PROCESS COULD TAKE UP TO 18
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT
MONTHS NOT TO MENTION TIME LOST
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO
TO THE PANDEMIC. DOES THAT FEEL
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT.
LIKE THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M.
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY
THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE?
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO
IT ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT. BUT
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY
I'M. I MEAN IT'S IT'S VERY HARD
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY
TO FEEL LIKE I AM GOING TO BE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE
TRYING TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE,
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A
FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED
ACCORDING TO THE CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST
JUSTICE INSTITUTE, A TOTAL
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE.
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN
OF 15 HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND
THE FUND SINCE LAST NOVEMBER,
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON
INCLUDING CHRISTINE. IN 1996
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON
SHE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU.
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS
TO 110 YEARS FOR THE ARSON AND
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL
DEATH HER 3 YEAR OLD SON WITH
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER
YOU. BUT IN 2012 17 YEARS LATER
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION
SHE WON A NEW TRIAL AFTER
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED.
NORTHWESTERN CENTER FOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE
WRONGFUL CONVICTION DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES.
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I
EVIDENCE HAD BEEN ALTERED. THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING
PROSECUTOR IN A CASE SIMPLY
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A
DROPPED THE CHARGES. I DIDN'T
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL.
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I
HAVE THE LUXURY OF GOING BACK
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES
TO COURT AND GETTING A NOT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED
GUILTY AND AN ACQUITTAL. I WAS
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN
RELEASED BASED ON CHANGES IN
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME.
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A
FIRE SCIENCE THAT PROVED THAT
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED
THERE WASN'T AN ARSON IN MY
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG.
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING
HOME. IT'S A CONTINUATION
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS,
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR
OF SOMETHING THEY'VE LIVED WITH
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT.
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS
TOO LONG. THIS WAITING FOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE
THEIR LAWYERS, WAITING FOR THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE
COURT. FRED WATSON IS A
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW.
PROFESSOR WITH THE WRONGFUL
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS
CONVICTION TEAM AT THE IU
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED
MCKINNEY SCHOOL OF LAW. SHE
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND.
SURPRISED AS MANY AS 15
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED
HOOSIERS HAVE APPLIED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS
INDIANA'S EXONERATION FUND. SHE
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT.
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT
SAYS DECIDING WHO'S ENTITLED TO
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME.
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU
THE MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS READILY
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF
APPARENT. SO I HAD THAT THAT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR
GROUP OF 15 BEFORE ME. YOU KNOW
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE
WHAT I WOULD START WITH IF IT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES
WERE ME I WOULD LOOK FOR THE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT
DNA CASES WHERE THERE WERE NOT
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS CASES LIKE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE
COOPER'S IN CAMPS BUT THOSE
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS.
EXONEREES AREN'T APPLYING TO
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF
THE INSTEAD THEY'RE SEEKING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN
BIGGER PAYOUTS WITH LAWSUITS. A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED.
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A
MAN ONCE CONVICTED OF KILLING
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST
HIS FAMILY AND THEN LATER
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR
ACQUITTED. HE FILED A CIVIL
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS.
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR
RIGHTS LAWSUIT AGAINST POLICE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF
AND PROSECUTORS ASKING FOR 30
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S
MILLION DOLLARS. LAST YEAR THE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT.
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED.
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA
CLEARED THE WAY FOR CAM'S HEFTY
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA
LAWSUIT. HE TOLD WILL BE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM
ACQUITTED. FORMER INDIANA STATE
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR
TROOPER ALLEGES DNA EVIDENCE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND
WAS SUPPRESSED AND COST HIM 13
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART
YEARS BEHIND BARS FOR THE
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS
DEATHS OF HIS WIFE AND TWO
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY
CHILDREN IN ELKHART COUNTY
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED
ISSUED THIS PARDON THIS MORNING
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM
FOR THE ROBBERY CONVICTION.
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED
GOVERNOR HOLCOMB CLEARED KEY
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE.
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND
COOPER'S NAME AFTER DNA FROM A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST.
ROBBERY CASE MATCHED SOMEONE
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD.
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M
ELSE. LIKE A THOUSAND POUND A
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS
WEIGHT LIFTED OFF MY CHEST. I
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS
FEEL GOOD. I'M GLAD I'M FREE.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON.
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING
COOPER SPENT EIGHT YEARS IN
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRISON AND SEVEN YEARS SEEKING
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS.
A PARDON. NOW HE'S SUING THE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A
ELKHART POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS
POTENTIALLY MILLIONS. CHRISTINE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED
INITIALLY FILED A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER,
LAWSUIT BUT IT WAS DISMISSED.
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT
AND EVEN THOUGH SHE SERVED MORE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE.
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS
TIME THAN CAMP AND GOOPER, SHE
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING AN
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL
CAN ONLY HOPE TO COLLECT 850000
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND
DOLLARS FROM THE STATE. THIS IS
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE I
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE I JUST
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO
TAKING AN EMOTIONAL TOLL AND

SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD.
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END
SOMEWHERE I JUST WANT TO SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS
THAT THIS IS GOOD AND I CAN
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED.
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY
MOVE FORWARD. IN THE END DID
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT.
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA
SAY THEIR CONVICTIONS WERE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT
VACATED. THEY'RE NOT GUILTY OR
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH
INNOCENT. THE INDIANA CRIMINAL
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
JUSTICE INSTITUTE SAYS IT WILL
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO
CAREFULLY REVIEW EACH CASE.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION
STATE REPRESENTATIVE GREG
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD
STEUERWALD WHO HELPED
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE
CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION SAYS
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY.
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S
HE UNDERSTANDS BUT WOULD LIKE
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A
TO SEE THIS PROCESS MOVE ALONG
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE
MORE SWIFTLY. NOW THERE'S ALSO
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL
SOME QUESTION ABOUT A REENTRY
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL PROHIBIT
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL PROHIBIT
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL PROHIBIT
THESE
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL PROHIBIT
THESE EXONEREES
PROGRAM THAT'S TIED TO THE FUND
AND WHETHER IT WILL PROHIBIT
THESE EXONEREES FROM
