>> THEY’RE CANDIDATES. >> COMING UP ON CURFEW.
>> COMING UP ON CURFEW. GARRET IS GOING IN FOR HIS MOVE.
GARRET IS GOING IN FOR HIS MOVE. >> MR. BIDEN, DID KAMALA HARRIS
>> MR. BIDEN, DID KAMALA HARRIS MISREPRESENT YOUR POSITION?
MISREPRESENT YOUR POSITION? >> YES, SHE DID.
>> YES, SHE DID. >> SHE MISCHARACTERIZED IT HOW,
>> SHE MISCHARACTERIZED IT HOW, SIR?
SIR? >> I DON’T THINK SHE INTENDED TO
>> I DON’T THINK SHE INTENDED TO DO IT.
DO IT. SHE MISCHARACTERIZED IT BECAUSE
SHE MISCHARACTERIZED IT BECAUSE I SUPPORTED BUSING TO ELIMINATE
I SUPPORTED BUSING TO ELIMINATE SEGREGATION.
SEGREGATION. IT’S TURNED AROUND BUT I
IT’S TURNED AROUND BUT I THINK -- THREE, TWO, ONE.
THINK -- THREE, TWO, ONE. >> SIR, THIS IS AN IMPORTANT
>> SIR, THIS IS AN IMPORTANT POINT TO CLARIFY, MR. VICE
POINT TO CLARIFY, MR. VICE PRESIDENT.
PRESIDENT. SHE MADE THE ARGUMENT THIS IS
SHE MADE THE ARGUMENT THIS IS VERY PERSONAL TO HER, THIS WAS
VERY PERSONAL TO HER, THIS WAS EVENTUALLY AN ISSUE THE FEDERAL
EVENTUALLY AN ISSUE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE A ROLE
GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE A ROLE INTERACTING IN THE LOCAL SPACE
INTERACTING IN THE LOCAL SPACE HERE.
HERE. SURE, WE SHOULD HAVE A ROLE IN
SURE, WE SHOULD HAVE A ROLE IN BREAK DOWN THE BARRIERS THAT
BREAK DOWN THE BARRIERS THAT EXIST.
EXIST. THAT’S WHAT I DID WHEN I WAS A
THAT’S WHAT I DID WHEN I WAS A LOCAL OFFICIAL AND COUNTY
LOCAL OFFICIAL AND COUNTY OFFICIAL.
OFFICIAL. WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT IS
WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT IS WHETHER OR NOT THE DEPARTMENT OF
WHETHER OR NOT THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AS OPPOSED TO THE
EDUCATION AS OPPOSED TO THE COURTS COULD ORDER THE JURY
COURTS COULD ORDER THE JURY SEGREGATION, MEANING SEGREGATION
SEGREGATION, MEANING SEGREGATION PROPOSED BY LAW.
PROPOSED BY LAW. I SUPPORTED OF COURSE AN ABILITY
I SUPPORTED OF COURSE AN ABILITY TO STRIKE DOWN ANY -- THE
TO STRIKE DOWN ANY -- THE DECIDING VOTE, I WAS THE
DECIDING VOTE, I WAS THE DECIDING VOTE.
DECIDING VOTE. THEY WANTED TO TAKE AWAY THE
THEY WANTED TO TAKE AWAY THE POWER OF THE COURT TO STOP
POWER OF THE COURT TO STOP BUSING.
BUSING. I VOTED AGAINST IT.
I VOTED AGAINST IT. ANYWAY --
ANYWAY -- >> IS IT FRUSTRATING TO YOU IN
>> IS IT FRUSTRATING TO YOU IN THE YEAR 2019 TO BE RELITIGATING
THE YEAR 2019 TO BE RELITIGATING THESE DEBATES AT THIS POINT?
THESE DEBATES AT THIS POINT? >> YEAH, IT SHOULD BE ABOUT THE
>> YEAH, IT SHOULD BE ABOUT THE FUTURE.
FUTURE. IT SHOULD BE ABOUT WHAT WE’RE
IT SHOULD BE ABOUT WHAT WE’RE GOING TO DO TO DEAL WITH
GOING TO DO TO DEAL WITH INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AND IT’S
INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AND IT’S REAL.
REAL. WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT WHAT
WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT WHAT WE’RE GOING TO BE DOING IN THE
WE’RE GOING TO BE DOING IN THE PRISON SYSTEM.
PRISON SYSTEM. FOR EXAMPLE, THE IDEA THE LOWER
FOR EXAMPLE, THE IDEA THE LOWER STATES HAVE PASSED NO PRIVATE
STATES HAVE PASSED NO PRIVATE PRISONS, DIDN’T GET THROUGH.
PRISONS, DIDN’T GET THROUGH. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS I
THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS I DON’T THINK WE SHOULD BE SENDING
DON’T THINK WE SHOULD BE SENDING ANYONE WITH A DRUG PROBLEM INTO
ANYONE WITH A DRUG PROBLEM INTO A PRISON.
A PRISON. THEY SHOULD BE GOING INTO A
THEY SHOULD BE GOING INTO A REHABILITATION SYSTEM.
REHABILITATION SYSTEM. WE SHOULD BE TRAINING PEOPLE IN
WE SHOULD BE TRAINING PEOPLE IN JAIL HOW TO READ AND WRITE.
JAIL HOW TO READ AND WRITE. NOT ONLY SHOULD THEY HAVE THEIR
NOT ONLY SHOULD THEY HAVE THEIR RIGHTS RESTORED TO VOTE BUT THEY
RIGHTS RESTORED TO VOTE BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE ALL THEIR BENEFITS
SHOULD HAVE ALL THEIR BENEFITS AVAILABLE TO THEM, PELL GRANTS
AVAILABLE TO THEM, PELL GRANTS AND SO ON.
AND SO ON. IT HAS TO START.
IT HAS TO START. IT HAS TO START IN ALLOWING
