The subject matter discussed in the background section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background section or associated with the subject matter of the background section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also be inventions.
Total hip replacement refers to a surgical procedure where a hip joint is replaced using a prosthetic implant. There are several different techniques that may be used, but all include a step of inserting an acetabular component into the acetabulum and positioning it correctly in three dimensions (along an X, Y, and Z axis).
In total hip replacement (THR) procedures there are advantages to patient outcome when the procedure is performed by a surgeon specializing in these procedures. Patients of surgeons who do not perform as many procedures can have increased risks of complications, particularly of complications arising from incorrect placement and positioning of the acetabular component.
The incorrect placement and positioning may arise even when the surgeon understood and intended the acetabular component to be inserted and positioned correctly. This is true because in some techniques, the tools for actually installing the acetabular component are crude and provide an imprecise, unpredictable coarse positioning outcome.
It is known in some techniques to employ automated and/or computer-assisted navigation tools, for example, x-ray fluoroscopy or computer guidance systems. There are computer assisted surgery techniques that can help the surgeon in determining the correct orientation and placement of the acetabular component. However, current technology provides that at some point the surgeon is required to employ a hammer/mallet to physically strike a pin or alignment rod. The amount of force applied and the location of the application of the force are variables that have not been controlled by these navigation tools. Thus even when the acetabular component is properly positioned and oriented, when actually impacting the acetabular component into place the actual location and orientation can differ from the intended optimum location and orientation. In some cases the tools used can be used to determine that there is, in fact, some difference in the location and/or orientation. However, once again the surgeon must employ an impacting tool (e.g., the hammer/mallet) to strike the pin or alignment rod to attempt an adjustment. However the resulting location and orientation of the acetabular component after the adjustment may not be, in fact, the desired location and/or orientation. The more familiar that the surgeon is with the use and application of these adjustment tools can reduce the risk to a patient from a less preferred location or orientation. In some circumstances, quite large impacting forces are applied to the prosthesis by the mallet striking the rod; these forces make fine tuning difficult at best and there is risk of fracturing and/or shattering the acetabulum during these impacting steps.
Surgical procedures relating to prostheses includes various revision procedures in addition to an initial installation or assembly. These revision procedures include removal of a prosthesis (or disassembly of an assembled modular prosthesis) which can be improved. One of the primary steps in hip, knee and shoulder revision surgery is the extraction of the retained components before surgical reconstruction. In revision surgery, the removal of components that are well fixed to bone and or cement can be a very difficult, demanding, and time consuming. Typically, significant damage is done to the remaining host bone by application of large impact forces with 3 lb to 4 lb mallets or slap-hammers. In general the retained prosthesis is grasped in some fashion (i.e. either through a hook and hole, vise grip, or threaded screw) this part of the tool is then attached to a C-clamp with an impaction plate or a slide-hammer (slap-hammer) for application of the impact force (in reverse to installation impact) for extraction of the prosthesis.
What is needed is a system and method for allowing any surgeon, including those surgeons who perform a fewer number of a revision procedure as compared to a more experienced surgeon who performs a greater number of procedures, to provide an improved likelihood of a favorable outcome approaching, if not exceeding, a likelihood of a favorable outcome as performed by a very experienced surgeon with the revision procedure.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds