The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family consists of at least twenty three distinct members (Basilico et al., Adv. Cancer Res. 59:115-165, 1992 and Fernig et al., Prog. Growth Factor Res. 5 (4):353-377, 1994) which generally act as mitogens for a broad spectrum of cell types. FGF18 was identified as a member of the FGF family which was most closely related to FGF8 and FGF17. Activities associated with FGF18 included stimulation of mesenchymal lineage cells, in particular cardiac myocytes, osteoblasts and chondrocytes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,971). FGF18 has binds and activates FGFR4 and the “IIIc” splice variants of FGFR3 and FGFR2. It has been shown that FGFR3 plays a role in bone growth. Mice made homozygous null for the FGFR3 (−/−) resulted in postnatal skeletal abnormalities (Colvin et al., Nature Genet. 12:309-397, 1996 and Deng et al., Cell 84:911-921, 1996). The mutant phenotype suggests that in normal mice, FGFR-3 plays a role in regulation of chondrocyte cell division in the growth plate region of the bone (Goldfarb, Cytokine and Growth Factor Rev. 7(4):311-325, 1996). FGF receptor mutations are also found in human chondrodysplasia and craniosynostosis syndromes (Ornitz and Marie, Genes and Development 16: 1446-1465, 2002).
Bone remodeling is the dynamic process by which tissue mass and skeletal architecture are maintained. The process is a balance between bone resorption and bone formation, with two cell types thought to be the major players. These cells are the osteoblast and osteoclast. Osteoblasts synthesize and deposit matrix to become new bone. The activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are regulated by many factors, systemic and local, including growth factors.
When bone resorption exceeds bone formation, a net loss in bone results, and the propensity for fractures is increased. Decreased bone formation is associated with aging and certain pathological states. In the U.S. alone, there are approximately 1.5 million fractures annually that are attributed to osteoporosis. The impact of these fractures on the quality of the patient's life is immense. Associated costs to the health care system in the U.S. are estimated to be $5-$10 billion annually, excluding long-term care costs.
Other therapeutic applications for growth factors influencing bone remodeling include, for example, the treatment of injuries which require the proliferation of osteoblasts to heal, such as fractures, as well as stimulation of mesenchymal cell proliferation and the synthesis of intramembraneous bone which have been indicated as aspects of fracture repair (Joyce et al. 36th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Feb. 5-8, 1990. New Orleans, La.).
Replacement of damaged articular cartilage caused either by injury or disease is a major challenge for physicians, and available treatments are considered unpredictable and effective for only a limited time. Virtually all the currently available treatments for cartilage damage focus on relief of pain, with little or no emphasis on regeneration of damaged tissues. Therefore, the majority of younger patients either do not seek treatment or are counseled to postpone treatment for long as possible. When treatment is required, the standard procedure is a total joint replacement or microfracture, a procedure that involves penetration of the subchondral bone to stimulate fibrocartilage deposition by chondrocytes. While deposition of fibrocartilage is not a functional equivalent of articular cartilage, it is at the present the best available treatment because there has been little success in replacing articular cartilage. Two approaches to stimulating deposition of articular cartilage that are being investigated are: stimulating chondrocyte activity in vivo and ex vivo expansion of chondrocytes and their progenitors for transplantation (Jackson et al., Arthroscopy: The J. of Arthroscopic and Related Surg. 12:732-738, 1996). In addition, regeneration or repair of elastic cartilage is valuable for treating injuries and defects to ear and nose. Any growth factor with specificity for chondrocytes lineage cells that stimulates those cells to grow, differentiate or induce cartilage production would be valuable for maintaining, repairing or replacing articular cartilage.
Administration of proteins generally requires a formulation that prolongs the half-life or biological activity of the active protein by increasing the resistance to proteolytic degradation or aggregation. Delivery of a protein therapeutic composition can also be difficult when the site for therapeutic action is preferably limited to a specific location in the body. The present invention provides formulations of FGF18 that will be easier to administer and more effective, and other uses that should be apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds