Historically, living tissue has been most commonly surgically repaired by thread, such as a suture, introduced by a pointed metal needle and tied with just enough tension to establish hemostasis or control of bleeding by compressing the tissue. Correct tension is established by the surgeon based on observation and judgment derived from extensive training. Excess tension can cause necrosis (the localized death of living tissue) and eventual failure of the repair.
An alternate method of joining tissue using metal staples has evolved over the last 90 years to a point where specialized staples for both skin and internal tissue closure are in common use today. The staples, which have sharp points for penetrating tissue, are formed in place by delivery instruments which bend them to a permanent shape suitable for tissue retention. The delivery instruments include mechanisms, such as an anvil, which control to some extent the relationship between tissue and staple, including the compression necessary to control bleeding. To the extent that they do so, surgeon skill is less of a factor in successful wound closure.
For conventional surgery, the clinical results for suturing and stapling are essentially the same, but both have their disadvantages. Sutures are suitable for all types of wound closure, but require that the surgeon have adequate access to the wound site and possess the skill to choose and apply the suture correctly. Conventional staples can also be appropriate for internal use, but require that a strong, rigid anvil be placed behind the tissues to be joined. Furthermore, the application of staples requires that there be enough space for an instrument, which can produce the necessary force to form the staple against the anvil. Stapling, however, is generally faster and, as previously noted, requires a lower level of skill.
The recent development of a beneficial, less invasive technique for gall bladder removal has suggested the feasibility of other abdominal procedures, such as bowel and hernia repair, that require the remote application of an internal fastener. As a result, less invasive instruments have been developed for both suturing and stapling remotely from the wound site by the surgeon. At the same time, patient benefit considerations are driving the development of less invasive techniques for a full range of abdominal and thoracic procedures including coronary artery bypass and valve replacement.
To date, stapling has proven to be more suitable for less invasive surgery than suturing. Instruments developed for that purpose approximately replicate the functions of stapler developed for open surgery and are approximately as easy to use. Instruments developed for less invasive suturing, on the other hand, are slow and cumbersome and do not solve the essential problem of tensioning the suture and tying the knot remotely. Sutures will find limited use in less invasive surgery but it is most likely that related wound closure problems beyond the capability of conventional staples will be solved by innovative mechanical fasteners which can more easily be remotely applied.
For instance, a new fastener has been designed for a less invasive hernia repair in which a synthetic mesh is used to reinforce the repair by anchoring it to surrounding tissue. Suturing is feasible but difficult. Conventional stapling is not feasible because an anvil cannot access the distal side of the tissue. The new fastener has the shape of a coil spring with the wire sharpened at one end and has been used successfully to attach the mesh by screwing the coil through it into the tissue. This new fastener can access the wound site through a small port in the abdominal wall. This fastener, however, does not produce compression upon the synthetic and natural tissue layers and thus does not produce hemostasis because the fastener is screwed into the wound site in its natural shape. Because this fastener does not create hemostasis, it may not be suitable for a wide range of surgical applications.
Other surgical fasteners have been fabricated from shape memory alloy. U.S. Pat. No. 4,485,816 to Krumme discloses a shape-memory surgical staple that uses an electric current to heat the staple to make it close. U.S. Pat. No. 5,002,562 to Pyka et al. discloses a fastener made from shape memory alloy that has the shape of a suturing loop in its undeformed shape. As noted above, however, sutures and staples are not always desirable for all surgical applications.
It is believed that other applications exist or will be identified for fastening layers of tissue where anvil access is not practical and where compression must be applied to the tissue to achieve hemostasis. For example, these criteria apply to the attachment of a graft more or less at right angles to another, larger, blood vessel (“end to side” anastomosis) such as the aorta for vascular bypass purposes. The availability of a less invasive vascular bypass procedure implies a significant patient benefit. Another example is the use of the fastener in endovascular procedures to attach a graft within large vessels such as the aorta, iliac or femoral arteries to repair aneurysms and occlusions. Stents, which are currently used for this purpose, are often insufficiently compliant to prevent leakage and consequent failure of the repair. Direct fixation of the graft to the inner wall of the vessel by the fasteners described herein may overcome this inherent problem of current techniques for endovascular repair.
What is desired, therefore, is a mechanical fastener and deployment instrument that can access internal tissue through a small surgical access port or incision and that can be applied conveniently and remotely.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds