In recent years there has been a significant improvement in the performance of automatic speech recognition systems. Commercially available systems such as the Personal Dictation System (IPDS) from IBM are capable of recognising natural language, providing the words are spoken discretely (ie the words are not run together but rather there is a distinct gap between adjacent words). Future development will of course further enhance the capabilities of such systems over the coming years, for example to allow full recognition of continuous speech. Automatic speech recognition systems such as the above-mentioned IPDS from IBM are now being offered for use as dictation machines, whereby a person dictating a letter or other document speaks to the system, which then automatically converts the speech into text. See "Computers that Listen", p30-35, New Scientist Dec. 4, 1993 for additional background information on such systems.
Whilst such a facility is clearly very powerful, there are some limitations on current technology that are not likely to be overcome in the foreseeable future. An example of such a restriction is for example where there are several speakers in a meeting, and to correctly minute the meeting there is a need to determine who is speaking at any particular time. In such circumstances a human recorder would typically rely on both visual and aural information in order to attribute speech to the correct speaker. Clearly an automatic speech recognition is unable to take advantage of such extra information, and so is unable to to replace a human recorder for this type of work.
Another area of technology which has seen considerable development over the past few years is teleconferencing. The driving force behind this activity is the recognition that face to face meetings, especially those which involve international journeys, are not only expensive, but also the excessive travelling necessarily wastes considerable time. It is therefore common nowadays for organisations to provide video teleconferencing suites, typically allowing parties in two or more remote sites to effectively hold a meeting together, despite their disparate locations.
The video suites required for conventional teleconferencing require expensive equipment and investment. Very recently therefore there has been a move to develop desk-top conferencing systems. Such systems exploit the fact that it is common for business people to have their own personal computer or workstation on their desk, and that these workstations are increasingly being linked together by various types of network, eg local area networks (LANs), or integrated services digital network (ISDN). The addition of suitable audio and video hardware to these workstations allows a distributed and highly flexible teleconferencing system to be provided. Examples of such multimedia conferencing systems are described in "Distributed Multiparty Desktop Conferencing System: MERMAID" by K Watabe, S Sakata, K Maeno, H Fukuoka, and T Ohmori, p27-38 in CSCW '90 (Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1990, Los Angeles); "Personal Multimedia Multipoint Communications Services for Broadband Networks" by E Addeo, A Gelman and A Dayao, p53-57 in Vol 1, IEEE GLOBECOM, 1988; and "Personal Multimedia-Multipoint Teleconference System" by H Tanigawa, T Arikawa, S Masaki, and K Shimamura, p1127-1134 in IEEE INFOCOM 91, Proceedings Vol 3. A distributed audio conferencing system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,001.
JP-2-260750-A describes a conferencing system in which each terminal is fitted with a controller. The terminal with the loudest output is fed to a speech-to-text conversion unit, which is subsequently used to make a record of the conference. JP-2-260751 describes a conferencing system in which a speech buffer is provided for each terminal. The stored speech is then directed to a central speech-to-text unit when there is no voice activity at the associated terminal. Although these two applications teach a basic facility for minuting meetings, they suffer from a lack of flexibility and non-optimum usage of speech recognition systems.
Accordingly, the invention provides a method of textually recording at a workstation spoken contributions to an audio conference, each participant in the conference having an associated workstation, the workstations being linked together by one or more networks, the method comprising the steps of:
receiving local speech input at the workstation; PA1 performing speech recognition on the local speech input at the workstation to generate a local text equivalent; PA1 transmitting the local speech input to the other participant(s) in the conference; PA1 receiving spoken contributions from the other participant(s) in the conference plus the corresponding text equivalents transmitted from the workstation associated with the respective participant; PA1 storing both the local text equivalents and the text equivalents received from the other workstation(s) in a text file. PA1 means for receiving local speech input at the workstation; PA1 means for performing speech recognition on the local speech input at the workstation to generate a local text equivalent; PA1 means for transmitting the local speech input to the other participant(s) in the conference; PA1 means for receiving spoken contributions from the other participant(s) in the conference plus the corresponding text equivalents transmitted from the workstation associated with the respective participant; PA1 means for storing both the local text equivalents and the text equivalents received from the other workstation(s) in a text file.
The audio conference itself can be implemented either over the network linking the workstations together, or over a separate network, for example using a conventional telephone conference. In the latter case the local speech input must be detected both by the conferencing system (eg telephone) and the microphone associated with the workstation for input into the speech recognition system. There is no requirement for any video conferencing facility, although this could be added to the system if desired.
The invention provides a distributed system for recording the minutes at a meeting, relying on real-time speech recognition at each participating node. Speech recognition has such a wide range of use that it will effectively become a standard feature of personal computers. By performing local speech recognition, the quality of the audio input signal is maximised (eg it is not distorted by transmission over the telephone network). Furthermore, each speech recognition systems can be trained to the user of that particular workstation; such speaker-dependent recognition offers improved accuracy over speaker-independent recognition. Another important aspect is that by using speech recognition in the desk top conferencing environment, the problem of attributing speech to different parties is readily solved; at any given workstation only the speech from the user of that workstation is converted into text, and this can then be readily marked with an indicator of origin (such as the name of the speaker or workstation). Thus when the text equivalents are combined into a single record in the text file, they already contain information identifying their source.
The only drawback of the local speech recognition is that the transmission of text format in addition to the audio could be regarded as redundant, although the extra bandwidth required by the text format is negligible. Conceivably one could drop the audio transmission, relying completely on the text format, which would be reconstituted into audio format at each receiving workstation using speech synthesis; however this is not very practicable, since the processing delay and recognition inaccurracies prevent any natural conversation, at least with current technology (moreover, future development of communications links is likely to provide ample bandwidth for audio transmissions). Nevertheless, such an approach may possibly be of interest for multilingual conferences, when an automatic translation unit could be interposed between the speech recognition and speech synthesis to convert the text into the correct language for each participant, although it will be appreciated that such a system is still some way off in the future.
Generally each text equivalent of a spoken contribution stored in said text file is accompanied by the time of the contribution and/or an indication of the origin of that spoken contribution, thereby providing an accurate record of the conference. Normally the indication of origin of a spoken contribution will be the name of the participant, but may also be the identity of the workstation from which the message was transmitted, if the former information is not available. The time recorded may be the time at which the message containing that contribution was received or alternatively, the time at which the text equivalent was actually generated at the originating workstation. The latter approach is more accurate, but requires the time to be included in the message itself. In general it will be necessary to edit the minutes text file after completion, for example to correct inaccuracies in the speech recognition. This can be performed jointly by all the participants in the conference using a shared editor to produce a single agreed set of minutes.
In a preferred embodiment the method further comprises the step of visually displaying at the workstation both the local text equivalents and the text equivalents received from the other workstation(s). This is useful if a participant in the conference has impaired hearing, or is having to understand a foreign language, in which case the displayed text may be easier to comprehend than the speech itself. Moreover, it provides a real-time indication to the participants of the text that is being recorded in the minutes.
In a preferred embodiment the text equivalents are visually displayed in a set of parallel columns, whereby each column displays the text equivalents of the spoken contributions from a single workstation. Preferably the method further includes the step of adjusting the cursor position within each of the columns after each new spoken contribution has been displayed to maintain horizontal alignment between the columns with regard to time synchronisation. Thus when read down the display the different contributions are correctly sequenced according to the order in which they were made.
Preferably the method further comprises the step of transmitting the local text equivalent of said local speech input to the other workstation(s) in the conference. This is useful for example to allow the other workstation(s) to display the text of spoken contributions made at the local workstation. The other workstation(s) could of course form their own set of minutes, although this might prove confusing and it may be best from a practical point of view to agree on just one node recording the minutes. To facilitate this the text recording process can be turned on and off during the audio conference (ie typically only a single node will turn on the text recording process). Note also that the ability to only record selected portions of the conference is useful to prevent the minutes becoming excessively long. Typically text recording might be turned on after a point has been discussed to allow the conclusions and any necessary actions arising therefrom to be minuted.
The invention further provides a system for textually recording at a workstation spoken contributions to an audio conference, each participant in the conference having an associated workstation, the workstations being linked together by one or more networks, the method comprising the steps of:
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds