Primary drug delivery methods include oral delivery and injections, but these methods present difficulties. For instance, injections are painful and both methods tend to provide bursts of agents rather than a preferred steady-state delivery. Additionally, the successful long term use of both oral delivery and injected delivery requires the patient to consistently meet the time requirements for the delivery method.
Transdermal delivery materials have been developed in an attempt to provide a painless route for delivery of active agents over a sustained period with little or no interruption of the patient's daily routine. Unfortunately, natural dermal characteristics such as the overlapping corneocytes of the stratum corneum, the tight junction of the stratum granulosum, and Langerhans cells of the stratum spinosum that may institute an immune response and/or a foreign body response all present barriers to successful transdermal delivery of an active agent.
Devices including microneedles that may facilitate transdermal delivery of active agents have improved transdermal delivery. A microneedle transdermal device includes an array of needles that may penetrate at least the stratum corneum of the skin and reach an underlying layer of the skin. In some devices, the microneedles are designed so as to penetrate to a depth that does not stimulate the nerve endings and institute a pain response. Examples of microneedle devices have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,856 to Allen, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,439 to Prausnitz, et al., both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Unfortunately, even with the inclusion of microneedles on a transdermal device, transdermal devices are presently limited to delivery of low molecular weight agents that have a moderate lipophilicity and no charge. Even upon successful crossing of the natural dermal boundary, problems still exist with regard to maintaining the activity level of delivered agents and avoidance of foreign body and immune response.
The nanotopography of a surface adjacent to a cell has been found to affect adhesive characteristics between the two as well as to effect cell behavior including morphology, motility, cytoskeleton architecture, proliferation, and differentiation (see, e.g., Hart, et al., European Cells and Materials, Vol. 10, Suppl. 2, 2005; Lim, et al., J R Soc Interface, Mar. 22, 2005, 2(2), 97-108; Yim, et al., Biomaterials, September, 2005, 26(26), 5405-5413). As an extension of this initial research, nanotopography of supporting substrates has been examined for use in tissue engineering (see, e.g., U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2008/0026464 to Borenstein, et al. and 2008/0311172 to Schapira, et al.).
What are needed in the art are improved drug delivery devices. For instance, devices that provide efficient delivery of active agents while decreasing potential immune and foreign body response to both the delivery device and the delivered agents would be beneficial.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds