Cytokines are soluble proteins secreted by a variety of cells including monocytes or lymphocytes that regulate immune responses. Chemokines are a superfamily of chemoattractant proteins. Chemokines regulate a variety of biological responses and they promote the recruitment of multiple lineages of leukocytes and lymphocytes to a body organ tissue. Chemokines may be classified into two families according to the relative position of the first two cysteine residues in the protein. In one family, the first two cysteines are separated by one amino acid residue, the CXC chemokines, and in the other family the first two cysteines are adjacent, the CC chemokines. Two minor subgroups contain only one of the two cysteines (C) or have three amino acids between the cysteines (CX3C). In humans, the genes of the CXC chemokines are clustered on chromosome 4 (with the exception of SDF-1 gene, which has been localized to chromosome 10) and those of the CC chemokines on chromosome 17.
The molecular targets for chemokines are cell surface receptors. One such receptor is CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which is a 7 transmembrane protein, coupled to G1 and was previously called LESTR (Loetscher, M., Geiser, T., O'Reilly, T., Zwahlen, R., Baggionlini, M., and Moser, B., (1994) J. Biol. Chem, 269, 232-237), HUMSTR (Federsppiel, B., Duncan, A. M. V., Delaney, A., Schappert, K., Clark-Lewis, I., and Jirik, F. R. (1993) Genomics 16, 707-712) and Fusin (Feng, Y., Broeder, C. C., Kennedy, P. E., and Berger, E. A. (1996) HIV-1 entry cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor, Science 272, 872-877). CXCR4 is widely expressed on cells of hemopoietic origin, and is a major co-receptor with CD4 for human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) Feng, Y., Broeder, C. C., Kennedy, P. E., and Berger, E. A. (1996) HIV-1 entry cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor, Science 272, 872-877).
Chemokines are thought to mediate their effect by binding to seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors, and to attract leukocyte subsets to sites of inflammation (Baglionini et al. (1998) Nature 392: 565-568). Many of the chemokines have been shown to be constitutively expressed in lymphoid tissues, indicating that they may have a homeostatic function in regulating lymphocyte trafficking between and within lymphoid organs (Kim and Broxmeyer (1999) J. Leuk. Biol. 56: 6-15).
Stromal cell derived factor one (SDF-1) is a member of the CXC family of chemokines that has been found to be constitutively secreted from the bone marrow stroma (Tashiro, (1993) Science 261, 600-602). The human and mouse SDF-1 predicted protein sequences are approximately 92% identical. Stromal cell derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and stromal cell derived factor-1β (SDF-1β) are closely related (together referred to herein as SDF-1). The native amino acid sequences of SDF-1α and SDF-1β are known, as are the genomic sequences encoding these proteins (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,048 issued 8 Oct. 1996, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,756,084 issued 26 May 1998). Identification of genomic clones has shown that the alpha and beta isoforms are a consequence of alternative splicing of a single gene. The alpha form is derived from exons 1-3 while the beta form contains an additional sequence from exon 4. The entire human gene is approximately 10 Kb. SDF-1 was initially characterized as a pre-B cell-stimulating factor and as a highly efficient chemotactic factor for T cells and monocytes (Bieul et al. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184:1101-1110).
Biological effects of SDF-1 may be mediated by the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (also known as fusin or LESTR), which is expressed on mononuclear leukocytes including hematopoietic stem cells. SDF-1 is thought to be the natural ligand for CXCR4, and CXCR4 is thought to be the natural receptor for SDF-1 (Nagasawza et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:726-732). Genetic elimination of SDF-1 is associated with parinatal lethality, including abnormalities in cardiac development, B-cell lymphopoiesis, and bone marrow myelopoiesis (Nagasawa et al. (1996) Nature 382:635-637).
SDF-1 is functionally distinct from other chemokines in that it is reported to have a fundamental role in the trafficking, export and homing of bone marrow progenitor cells (Aiuti, A., Webb, I. J., Bleul, C., Springer, T:, and Guierrez-Ramos, J. C., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 185, 111-120 and Nagasawa, T., Hirota, S., Tachibana, K., Takakura N., Nishikawa, S.-I., Kitamura, Y., Yoshida, N., Kikutani, H., and Kishimoto, T., (1996) Nature 382, 635-638). SDF-1 is also structurally distinct in that it has only about 22% amino acid sequence identity with other CXC chemokines (Bleul, C. C., Fuhlbrigge, R. C., Casasnovas, J. M., Aiuti, A., and Springer, T. A., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1101-1109). SDF-1 appears to be produced constitutively by several cell types, and particularly high levels are found in bone-marrow stromal cells (Shirozu, M., Nakano, T., Inazawa, J., Tashiro, K., Tada, H. Shinohara, T., and Honjo, T., (1995) Genomics, 28, 495-500 and Bleul, C. C., Fuhlbrigge, R. C., Casasnovas, J. M., Aiuti, A., and Springer, T. A., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1101-1109). A basic physiological role for SDF-1 is implied by the high level of conservation of the SDF-1 sequence between species. In vitro, SDF-1 stimulates chemotaxis of a wide range of cells including monocytes and bone marrow derived progenitor cells (Aiuti, A., Webb, U., Bleul, C., Springer, T., and Guierrez-Ramos, J. C., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 185, 111-120 and Bleul, C. C., Fuhlbrigge, R. C., Casasnovas, J. M., Aiuti, A., and Springer, T. A., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1101-1109). SDF-1 also stimulates a high percentage of resting and activated T-lymphocytes (Bleul, C. C., Fuhlbrigge, R. C., Casasnovas, J. M., Aiuti, A., and Springer, T. A., (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1101-1109 and Campbell, J. J., Hendrick, J., Zlotnik, A., Siani, M. A., Thompson, D. A., and Butcher, E. C., (1998) Science, 279 381-383).
Native SDF-1 has been demonstrated to induce the maturation and activation of platelets (Hamada T. et al., J. Exp. Med. 188, 638-548 (1998); Hodohara K. et al., Blood 95, 769-775 (2000); Kowalska M. A. et al., Blood 96, 50-57 (2000)), and CXCR4 is expressed on the megakaryocytic lineage cells (CFUOMeg) (Wang J-F. et al., Blood 92, 756-764 (1998)).
A variety of diseases require treatment with agents that are preferentially cytotoxic to dividing cells. Cancer cells, for example, may be targeted with cytotoxic doses of radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. A significant side-effect of this approach to cancer therapy is the pathological impact of such treatments on rapidly dividing normal cells. These normal cells may for example include hair follicles, mucosal cells and the hematopoietic cells, such as primitive bone marrow progenitor cells and stem cells. The indiscriminate destruction of hematopoietic stem, progenitor or precursor cells can lead to a reduction in normal mature blood cell counts, such as leukocytes, lymphocytes and red blood cells. A major impact on mature cell numbers may be seen particularly with neutrophils (neutropaenia) and platelets (thrombocytopenia), cells which naturally have relatively short half-lives. A decrease in leukocyte count, with concomitant loss of immune system function, may increase a patient's risk of opportunistic infection. Neutropaenia resulting from chemotherapy may for example occur within two or three days of cytotoxic treatments, end may leave the patient vulnerable to infection for up to 2 weeks until the hematopoietic system has recovered sufficiently to regenerate neutrophil counts. A reduced leukocyte count (leukopenia) and/or a platelet count (granulocytopenia) as a result of cancer therapy may become sufficiently serious that therapy must be interrupted to allow the white blood cell count to rebuild. Interruption of cancer therapy can in turn lead to survival of cancer cells, an increase in the incidence of drug resistance in cancer cells, and ultimately in cancer relapse. There is accordingly a need for therapeutic agents and treatments, which facilitate the preservation of hematopoietic progenitor or stem cells in patients subject to treatment with cytotoxic agents. There is similarly a need for therapeutic agents and treatments that facilitate the preservation or regeneration (self-renewal) of hematopoietic cell populations in cases where the number of such cells has been reduced due to disease or to therapeutic treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy.
Hematopoietic cells that are uncommitted to a final differentiated cell type are identified herein as “progenitor” cells. Hematopoietic progenitor cells possess the ability to differentiate into a final cell type directly or indirectly through a particular developmental lineage. Undifferentiated, pluripotent progenitor cells that are not committed to any lineage are referred to herein as “stem cells.” All hematopoietic cells can in theory be derived from a single stem cell, which is also able to perpetuate the stem cell lineage, as daughter cells become differentiated. The isolation of populations of mammalian bone marrow cell populations which are enriched to a greater or lesser extent in pluripotent stem cells has been reported (see for example, C. Verfaillie et al., J. Exp. Med., 172, 509 (1990), incorporated herein by reference).
Bone marrow transplantation has been used in the treatment of a variety of hematological, autoimmune and malignant diseases. In conjunction with bone marrow transplantation, ex vivo hematopoietic (bone marrow) cell culture may be used to expand the population of hematopoietic cells, particularly progenitor or stem cells, prior to reintroduction of such cells into a patient. In ex vivo gene therapy, hematopoietic cells may be transformed in vitro prior to reintroduction of the transformed cells into the patient. In gene therapy, using conventional recombinant DNA techniques, a selected nucliec acid, such as a gene, may be isolated, placed into a vector, such as a viral vector, and the vector transfected into a hematopoietic cell, to transform the cell, and the cell may in turn express the product coded for by the gene. The cell then may then be introduced into a patient. Hematopoietic stem cells were initially identified as a prospective target for gene therapy (see e.g., Wilson, J. M., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 85: 3014-3018 (1988)). However, problems have been encountered in efficient hematopoietic stem cell transfection (see Miller, A. D., Blood 76: 271-278 (1990)). There is accordingly a need for agents and methods that facilitate the proliferation of hematopoietic cells in ex vivo cell culture. There is also a need for agents that may be used to facilitate the establishment and proliferation of engrafted hematopoietic cells that have been transplanted into a patient.
The broad application of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation therapy, however, may be limited by several features. The acquisition of enough stem cells for clinical use may require either a bone marrow harvest under general anesthesia or peripheral blood leukapheresis; both are expensive and carry a risk of morbidity. Grafts may contain only a limited number of useful hematopoietic progenitors. Additionally, the kinetics of short-term stem cell engraftment may be such that for the first 1-3 weeks after infusion, these cells offer little hematopoietic support, and therefor the recipients may remain profoundly myelosuppressed during this time.
Hematopoietic stem cells are reportedly found in peripheral blood of healthy persons. Their numbers however, may be insufficient to permit collection of an adequate graft by standard leukapheresis (Kessionger, A. et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 6, 643-646 (1989)). Fortunately, a variety of methods have been discovered to increase the circulation of progenitor and stem cells by “mobilizing” them from the marrow into the peripheral blood. For autologous transplantation, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells may be mobilized into the peripheral blood (Lane T. A. Transfusion 36, 585-589 (1996)) during the rebound phase of the leukocytes after transient leukopenia induced by myelosuppressive chemotherapy, (Giralt S. et al., Blood, 89, 4531-4536 (1997) by hematopoietic growth factors, or (Lasky L. C. et al., Transfusion 21, 247-260 (1981)) by a combination of both.
Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization into peripheral blood has been used as a procedure following myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens to mobilize hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells into the peripheral blood. Suggested treatment regimens for mobilization may include cyclophosphamide alone, in single doses of 4-7 g/m 2, or other agents such as Adriamycin (doxorubicin), carboplatin, Taxol (paclitaxel), etoposide, ifosfamide, daunorubicin, cytosine arabinosides 6-thioguanine, either alone or in combination (Richman, C. M. et al., Blood 47, 1031-1039 (1976); Stiff P. J. et al., Transfusion 23, 500-503 (1983); To L. B. et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 9, 277-284 (1992)). Such a regiment may induce a transient but profound myelosuppression in patients, with white blood cell (WBC) counts in some cases dropping below 100 cells-mm3 7-14 days after chemotherapy. This maybe followed on day 10-21 by rapid reappearance of leukocytes in the peripheral blood and frequently a “rebound” increase of the circulating leukocytes above baseline levels. As the leukocyte count rises, hematopoietic progenitor cells also begin to appear in the peripheral blood and rapidly increase.
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) collected from mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are increasingly used for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation after myeloablative or nonmyeloablative therapies (Lane T. A. Transfusion 36, 585-589 (1996)). Purported advantages of PBPC transplantation include rapid and durable trilineage hematologic engraftment, improved tolerance of the harvesting procedure (without general anesthesia), and possibly diminished tumor contamination in the autologous setting (Lasky L. C. et al., Transfusion 21, 247-260 (1981); Moss T. J. et al, Blood 76, 1879-1883)). Techniques for autologous mobilized PBPC grafting may also be successful for allogeneic transplantation. Early reports in animals and syngeneic transplants in humans supported this hypothesis (Kessionger, A. et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 6, 643-646 (1989)).
Many investigators have reported that PBPC mobilization employing a combination of chemotherapy and followed by growth factor (GM-CSF or G-CSF) administration is more effective than either chemotherapy or growth factor alone (Siena S. et al., Blood 74, 1905-1914 (1989); Pettengel R. et al., Blood, 2239-2248 (1993); Haas R. et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 9, 459-465 (1992); Ho A. D. et al., Leukemia 7, 1738-1746 (1993)). The combination reportedly results in a 50- to 75-fold increase in circulating CFU-GM and 10- to 50- fold increase in CD34+ cells (Pettengel R. et al., Blood, 2239-2248 (1993); Haas R. et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 9, 459-465 (1992); Ho A. D. et al., Leukemia 7, 1738-1746 (1993)). Direct comparisons show that chemotherapy and growth factors resulted in a mean 3.5-fold greater peak number of circulating CFU-GM (range, 0 to 6.8 times greater verses chemotherapy or growth factor alone (Siena S. et al., Blood 74, 1905-1914 (1989); Pettengel R. et al., Blood, 2239-2248 (1993); Haas R. et al., Bone Marrow Transplant 9, 459-465 (1992); Moskowitz C. H. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 4, 311-316 (1998)).
It is reportedly possible to expand hematopoietic progenitor cells in stroma-containing or nonstromal systems. Expansion systems have reportedly shown increases in CFU_GM of more than 100-fold. Enrichment of CD34+ cells may be required before expansion in nonstromal culture but may not be necessary in stroma-containing systems. Early results of clinical trails are encouraging and have been taken to demonstrate that the engraftment potential of the expanded hematopoietic cells is not compromised by culture. Expansion of cord blood-derived hematopoietic cells may be especially important because of the limited number of cells that can be collected. Successful expansion of primitive and committed hematopoietic cells from cord blood may allow more extensive use in clinical transplantation, particularly in adult patients. Other possible applications of stem cell expansion include purging of tumor cells; production of immune-competent cells, such as dendritic cells and NK cells, and gene therapy.
Permanent marrow recovery after cytotoxic drug and radiation therapy generally depends on the survival of hematopoietic stem cells having long term reconstituting (LTR) potential. The major dose limiting sequelae consequent to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy are typically neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Protocols involving dose intensification (i.e., to increase the log-kill of the respective tumour therapy) or schedule compression may exacerbate the degree and duration of myelosuppression associated with the chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. For instance, in the adjuvant setting, repeated cycles of doxorubicin-based treatment have been shown to produce cumulative and long-lasting damage in the bone marrow progenitor cell populations (Lorhrman et al., (1978) Br. J. Haematol. 40:369). The effects of short-term hematopoietic cell damage resulting from chemotherapy has been overcome to some extent by the concurrent use of G-CSF (Neupogen®), used to accelerate the regeneration of neutrophils (Le Chevalier (1994) Eur. J. Cancer 30A:410). This approach has been met with limitations also, as it may be accompanied by progressive thrombocytopenia and cumulative bone marrow damage as reflected by a reduction in the quality of mobilized progenitor cells over successive cycles of treatment. Because of the current interest in chemotherapy dose intensification as a means of improving tumour response rates and perhaps patient survival, the necessity for alternative therapies to either improve or replace current treatments to rescue the myeloablative effects of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy has escalated, and is currently one of the major rate limiting factors for tumour therapy dose escalations.
Transplanted peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC, or autologous PBSC) may provide a rapid and sustained hematopoietic recovery after the administration of high-dose chemotherapy or radiation therapy in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumours. PBSC transplantation has become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the shorter time to engraftment and the lack of a need for surgical procedures such as are necessary for bone marrow harvesting (Demirer et al. (1996) Stem Cells 14:106-116; Pettengel et al., (1992) Blood 82:2239-2248). Although the mechanism of stem cell release into the peripheral blood from the bone marrow is not well understood, agents that augment the mobilization of CD34+ cells may prove to be effective in enhancing autologous PBSC transplantation. G-CSF and GM-CSF are currently the most commonly used hematopoietic growth factors for PBSC mobilization, although the mobilized cellular profiles can differ significantly from patient to patient. Therefore, other agents are required for this clinical application.
It has been suggested that stem cell transplants for autoimmune disease should be initiated using autologous or allogenic grafts, where the former may be preferable since they may bear less risk of complication (Burt and Taylor (1999) Stem Cells 17:366-372). Lymphocyte depletion has also been recommended, where lymphocyte depletion is a form of purging autoreactive cells from the graft. In practice, aggressive lymphocyte depletion of an allograft can reportedly ameliorate autoreactivity (i.e., graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)) even without immunosuppressive prophylaxis. Therefore, a lymphocyte-depleted autograft may prevent recurrence of autoreactivity. As a consequence, any concurrent therapy that may enhance the survival of the CFU-GEMM myeloid stem cells, or BFU-E, CFUMeg (CFU-MK) and CFU-GM myelomonocytic stem cells may be beneficial in therapies for autoimmune diseases where hematopoietic stem cells could be compromised.
Platelet activation in healthy subjects after G-CSF administration has been reported. The effects were indicated by increased platelet expression of P-selectin (Avenarius H. J. et al., Int. J. Hematol. 58, 189-196 (1993), blood thromboxane B2, and AT-III complex levels R. G-CSF reportedly enhances platelet aggregation to collagen and adenosine diphosphate (Kuroiwa M. et al., Int. J. Hematol. 63, 311-316 (1996)). There have, however, been reports of arterial thrombosis in two patients with cancer who were receiving G-CSF after chemotherapy (Shimoda K. et al., J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1310-1313 (1993)), and concern has been expressed regarding induction of a possible prethrombotic state in some normal donors (Conti J. A. et al., Cancer 70, 2699-2707 (1992); Kawachi Y. et al., Br. J. Haematol. 94, 413-416 (1996)) and such risk was suggested in two cases (Anderlini P. et al., Blood 90, 903-908 (1997)).
Depressed platelet count after PBPC collection may occur in healthy donors of allogeneic transplants. The decrease in platelet counts during apheresis for autologous transplant recipient can reportedly be substantial, especially for those heavily pretreated patients mobilized with chemotherapy plus growth factor. Platelet transfusion may be considered when the postapheresis count drops below 20.000/mm 3, although the threshold should be individualized and depends on the status of the patient (inpatient vs. outpatient), the history of platelet recovery after chemotherapy, the amount of infused anticoagulant (hence the number of prior apheresis sessions within the same mobilization and collection series), and whether apheresis will be performed the next day. It is possible to separate platelets from the PBPC product using a low-speed centrifugation procedure. The platelets may by infused fresh or cryopreserved for later infusion. (Schiffer C. A. et al., Ann N. Y. Acad. Sci. 411, 161-169 (1983)). The platelet cryopreservation procedure, however, has not been universally accepted. (Law P., Exp. Hematol. 10, 351-357 (1983)). Furthermore, the PBPC product of patients with a low platelet count and who require transfusion typically does not contain enough platelet to warrant processing (Lane, unpublished observation (Lane T. A. Transfusion 36, 585-589 (1996)).
Clinical trials using gene transfer into HSC have generally relied on retrovirus-mediated gene transfer methods. Retroviruses fill the need for stable and relatively efficient integration of engineered genetic elements into the chromosomes of target T cells. Other viral vector systems currently available, such as adenovirus or adenovirus-associated viral vectors, or transfection methods, such as lipofection, electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, or bioballistics, may lack similar efficiency for long-term expression of the transgenes in dividing HSC. Some vectors may not enter the cells in sufficient numbers without cytotoxicity and/or may not integrate stability into the chromosomes with useful efficiency. In dividing cells, unintegrated DNA is generally diluted and lost. Adenoviral vectors may also be highly immunogenic.
Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer into murine hematopoietic stem cells and reconstitution of syngeneic mice has demonstrated persistence and functioning of the transgenes over extended period of time (Kume et al. (1999) 69:227-233). Terminally differentiated cells are relatively short-lived, except for memory B and T lymphocytes, and a large number of blood cells are replaced daily. Therefore, when long-term functional correction of blood cells by gene transfer is required, the target cells may be hematopoietic stem cells (Kume et al. (1999) 69:227-233). Compounds that can maintain the survival and/or self-renewal (for example enhanced number of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle) of the progenitor stem cells may therefore increase the efficiency of the gene transfer in that a greater population of hematopoietic stems cells is available.
A number of proteins have been identified and may be utilized clinically as inhibitors of hematopoietic progenitor cell development and hematopoietic cell proliferation or multiplication. These include recombinant-methionyl human G-CSF (Neupogen®, Filgastim; Amgen), GM-CSF (Leukine®, Sargramostim; Immunex), erythropoietin (rhEPO, Epogene; Amgen), thrombopoietin (rhTPO; Genentech), interleukin-11 (rhIL-11, Neumega®; American Home Products), Flt3 ligand (Mobista; Immunex), multilineage hematopoietic factor (MARstem™; Maret Pharm.), myelopoietin (Leridistem; Searle), IL-3, myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor-1 (Mirostipen; Human Genome Sciences), stem cell factor (rhSCF, Stemgen®; Amgen).
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds