Modern aircraft are manufactured from numerous panels and other parts that are fastened together with rivets, screws, bolts, and other permanent fasteners. To aid in assembly, parts are typically held together with temporary clamps and fixtures until permanent fasteners can be installed. Parts that incorporate sealant on the mating surfaces require that the temporary clamps exert sufficient force to squeeze excessive sealant from the joint while pulling parts together before the sealant fully cures. Heavy structures fastened with five-sixteenths of an inch size permanent fasteners, for example, require in excess of 500 pounds clamp load to squeeze the sealant out to an acceptable thickness and hold the components together. Other applications, such as in wing-to-body joints, require upwards of 1500 pounds with five-sixteenths of an inch size fasteners to temporarily secure components. The clamp load requirements for other sizes are generally proportional to the cross-sectional area of the basic fastener diameter.
Blind hole clamps are desirable for airframe assembly, because their installation and removal can be more easily automated than the installation and removal of conventional bolts and nuts. However, existing blind hole clamps do not have a blind head large enough to avoid surface damage on the blind side panel when high clamp loads are imparted.
Oftentimes, one or more work pieces are joined with clamps to maintain part orientation during an autoclave curing cycle. Threaded-type reusable blind clamps are capable of high clamp loads, but lack the smooth shank needed to avoid clogging with resin as the parts are cured. As a result, the clamps are difficult to remove and may damage the work pieces upon removal. Blind tack rivets may have the required smooth shank but are incapable of imparting sufficient clamp load to maintain parts in the required orientation. Conventional slave bolts are not capable of automated installation and removal.
In addition, threaded temporary blind clamps are easily clogged with sealant and resins, making removal from assemblies difficult and necessitating cleaning before they may be reused. Another problem with threaded temporary fasteners is that they protrude above the accessible panel surface by a relatively large amount. Accordingly, robotic assembly equipment must retract or back away from the work pieces to avoid collisions with installed clamps. As a result, installation of threaded temporary fasteners requires additional time to traverse from one location to another.
Finally, the clamping capability of threaded temporary clamps is limited, because the blind head is discontinuous and high clamp loads result in surface damage to the work pieces. Temporary blind tack rivets have a low profile but must be removed by drilling through the manufactured head. Drilling through the head, however, generates metal chips that can damage panel surfaces. Oftentimes, for example, the rivet spins in the hole during the drilling operation, halting the advance of the drill bit through the tack rivet and prolonging the removal cycle time. Tack rivets also have very low clamp loads and produce a small blind-side upset that is not suitable for use in laminated composite panels.
Slave bolts may consist of a conventional nut and bolt or a pull-type lock bolt with a swage collar. Slave bolts may provide a non-clogging shank, non-drill out removal and high clamp loads. However, slave bolts require access to both sides of the work pieces and, in many cases, two operators to install. Two-sided installations are difficult and costly to automate.
Therefore, a need exists for a clamp, or a temporary fastener, having a smooth cylindrical shank without grooves, threads and other discontinuities that may become clogged with sealant or cured resin and which is capable of high clamp loads (greater than 500 pounds for a five-sixteenths of an inch size clamp) without damaging fragile panel surfaces. In addition, a need exists for a low profile temporary clamping fastener capable of installation and removal from a single accessible side of the work pieces, preferably by robotic equipment, in a manner that does not generate drilling debris. A one-sided installation and removal process is desired for saving labor costs over a conventional two-person operation using nuts and bolts. Finally, a need exists for a temporary fastener having a predetermined geometry to control installation clamp loads rather than allowing the installation force to be controlled by outside influences, such as, operator skill.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds