Understanding the basis of disease and the development of therapeutic and preventative treatments has evolved over the last century from empirical observation and experimentation to genome wide mutation scanning. The revolution in genomics has provided researchers with the tools to look for a genomic basis for disease. The Human Genome effort has generated a raw sequence of the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome and revealed about 35,000 genes. Genetic variations amongst different individuals and in and in between populations are being studied in order to determine the association with the predisposition to disease or the correlation to drug efficacy and/or side effects. The promise of personalized medicine based on a panel of genetic markers has tantalized the healthcare community and provides an important goal for those focused on providing diagnostic and treatment options for healthcare providers and patients.
With the development of a varitey tools in molecular biology, such as nucleic amplification methods, cloning and expression systems and methods, disease analysis has been based on a genomics or bottom up approach. This is approach presumes that a genetic change or set of changes will have a long reaching effect on protein function by affecting mRNA transcription or protein structure and function.
Technologies have been developed to analyze single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an industrial scale (e.g., MassARRAY™ and the MassARRAY® system, Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) and in pooled samples to study the frequency of SNPs in populations of various gender, ethnicity, age and health condition. The ultimate goal of these efforts is to understand the etiology of disease on the molecular level (e.g., based on genetic variances (pharmacogenomics)), to develop diagnostic assays and effective drugs with few or no side-effects.
Genomics has fallen short of the original expectation that this strategy could be used to stratify a population relative to a defined phenotype, including differences between normal and disease patient population or population. Although single genetic markers have been found to be associated with or cause or predict a specific disease state, genomic information may not be sufficient to stratify individual populations by of the association of an SNP (or SNPs) with a given disease, drug side-effect or other target phenotype. Because of the large number of potential targets and regulatory signals that affect protein translation, it is not sufficient to establish the differential expression profiles of messenger RNA in comparing phenotypes or populations, such as healthy and disease states, such as the analyses using expression DNA chips (e.g., GeneChip™ technology, Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif.; LifeArray™ technology, Incyte Genomics, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.). The metabolic activities in a cell are not performed by mRNA but rather by the translated proteins and subsequently posttranslationally modified products, such as the alkylated, glycosylated and phosphorylated products.
The study of proteomics encompasses the study of individual proteins and how these proteins function within a biochemical pathway. Proteomics also includes the study of protein interactions, including how they form the architecture that constitutes living cells. In many human diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes as well as host responses to infectious diseases, the elucidation of the complex interactions regulatory proteins, which can cause diseases, is a critical step to finding effective treatment. Often, SNPs and other nucleic acid mutations occur in genes whose products are such proteins as (1) growth related hormones, (2) membrane receptors for growth hormones, (3) components of the trans-membrane signal pathway and (4) DNA binding proteins that act on transcription and the inactivation of suppressor genes (e.g. P53) causing the onset of disease.
Complex protein mixtures are analyzed by two-dimensionsl (2D) gel electrophoresis and subsequent image processing to identify changes in the pattern (structural changes) or intensity of various protein spots. Two-dimensionsl gel electrophoresis is a laborious, error-prone method with low reproducibility and cannot be effectively automated. This gel technology is unable to effectively analyze membrane proteins. Further, the resolution of 2D gels is insufficient to analyze the profile of all proteins present in a mixture.
Available protein chips are limited by their ability to specifically capture hydrophobic and membrane proteins, which frequently targets of drug development. Once bound to the chip, proteins are highly unstable and their structures often do not reflect the true conformation found under physiological conditions.
Thus, there is a need to develop technologies for analysis of the proteome that allow scaling up to industrial levels with the features of an industrial process: high accuracy, reproducibility and flexibility in that the process is of high-throughput, automatable and cost-effective. There is a need to develop technologies that permit probing and identification of proteins and other biomolecules in their native conformation using automated protocols and systems therefor. In particular, there is a need to develop strategies and technologies for identification and characterization of hydrophobic proteins under physiological conditions. Therefore, among the objects herein, it is an object herein to provide such technologies.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds