Microbubbles, encompassing both natural and synthetic gas-filled microcavities, are well known in the art. For example, gas-filled microcavities have been employed for enhanced oil recovery, as contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound, as reagents in in situ bioremediation of contaminated ground water, and as flotation devices for the separation of minerals.
Microbubbles used heretofore in the art have been synthetic in nature. That is, microbubbles have been produced by methods such as passing air through a surfactant solution. One known technique provides a rapid flow of a dilute surfactant solution through a venturi throat through which gas is emitted to generate the surfactant-stabilized microbubbles. Another example includes employing a triple-barreled jet head that allows for the simultaneous development of an alginate drop and injection of an air bubble inside the drop. Depending on the production type, these microbubbles have been referred to as microballoons, colloidal gas aphrons, micro gas dispersions, and microfoams.
Although synthetically produced microbubbles are well known in the art, they have several shortcomings. Namely, synthetically produced microbubbles lack consistency of size, have poor stability and mechanical strength, and are often biologically incompatible.
Naturally occurring microbubbles, such as gas vesicles, are also known. Many organisms produce and/or employ microbubbles for various biological functions. Specifically, ecological studies show that many microorganisms living in aquatic systems utilize microbubbles as buoyancy devices. Their importance in providing buoyancy for planktonic cyanobacteria and helping them perform vertical migration in lakes and other aquatic systems has been widely recognized. Additionally, they are postulated to play a role in light shielding, as well as providing the cell with the ability to alter its configuration to increase cell surface area as a function of volume.
Among the difficulties in utilizing naturally occurring microbubbles for commercial purposes is the fact that it is difficult to harvest them. For example, in typical industrial microbial fermentations, cells are collected by either filtration or centrifugation. Filtration involves large pressure gradients or mechanical forces that tend to collapse the gas vesicles, and centrifugation is inefficient because the vesicle-bearing cells often have densities very close to that of water. Further, where centrifugal force is strong enough to achieve efficient cell collection, such forces often destroy the gas vesicles. It is also difficult to sterilize them so that they can be kept stable against microbial and enzymatic attack.
Thus, there is a need in the art to overcome the shortcomings of synthetically produced microbubbles. Further, there is a need in the art to overcome the difficulties in harvesting naturally occurring microbubbles and utilizing such microbubbles for commercial purposes in lieu of synthetic microbubbles.
USPTO Backgrounds
USPTO Backgrounds