Erie-class gunboat

The Erie class gunboats were a class of gunboats built by the United States prior to World War II. The class was designed in 1932, and commissioned into the United States Navy in 1936:  and . The Eries had a design speed of  and a main  armament of four  guns in single mounts with four  quadruple mount anti-aircraft guns.

Development
In 1930, during the London Naval Conference, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral William V. Pratt, successfully argued for an additional class of naval surface combatants that would not be limited in number that could be constructed. Defined as a sloop, per Article VIII(b) of the Treaty. The ships could neither exceed  of displacement nor a maximum cruising speed of 20 knots and their armament was limited to up to four guns above  in caliber, but not to exceed  in caliber, and they could not mount torpedo tubes.

It was proposed that the Eries could be used in a number of roles, including: screening the fleet against enemy destroyers and submarines, high-speed mine laying, tactical control of fleet submarines, antiaircraft duty for slower carriers, support of destroyer attacks, anti-submarine warfare during convoy duty, and support of amphibious landing operations. They could also relieve destroyers that were in short demand at the time, the 6-inch guns could be useful against merchant raiders, and with its shallow draft and heavy firepower they could be used to "show the flag" in Central and South American and Far East ports during peacetime.

In late January 1931, ADM Pratt informally requested that Construction & Engineering start preliminary designs. Originally the ship was to be used in Central American service, but with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the ships mission was expanded to protecting US interest in the Far East as well.

Between August 1931 and 7 September 1932, seven preliminary schemes, lettered A thru G, were drawn up. The General Board recommend at its November 1932 meeting that a 2,000-ton gunboat be built based on a modified version of scheme G. The ship would feature a clipper bow with a counter stern. The main batteries would be four single mounted 6-inch guns of either 47 or 48 caliber with two  mounted fore and two  mounted aft. A single floatplane, located amidships, which would be offloaded and retrieved by crane, was also added at ADM Pratt's insistence.

Funding
US President Herbert Hoover called for a special session of the United States Congress in July 1930, to ratify the terms of the London Treaty. With Congress ratifing the treaty on July 21, the Navy and Congress had the expectation that the Navy would be built up to the treaty limits. It was soon realized by ADM Pratt that with the worsening economy and pacifist president Hoover, the construction of new or replacement ships would be severely limited. That December, ADM Pratt reported to Congress that the buildup to the treaty limits would not be able to occur before 1936, and would cost in excess of $1 billion, if authorized. Even woresening economic conditions and concern with the 1932 national elections, the fate of naval construction in the US was sealed. Not a single new ship was authorized for construction during Hoover's presidential term, he even cut the limited funds that had been appropriated for construction in fiscal year 1932, suspended all construction in fiscal year 1933, and compelled the Navy to reduce operational expenses severely.

The election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in November 1932, neither the building up of the US Navy to the limits of the London Naval treaty, nor the construction of any Erie-class gunboats, seemed like a sure thing. Roosevelt had expressed support for an adequate navy during the election campaign but had never really elaborated on his position. It would be left up to Claude Swanson, Roosevelt's appointed Secretary of the Navy, and Carl Vinson, Chairman of the House Naval Affairs Committee, to begin advocating for the buildup of the Navy to the limits of the London Naval Treaty, even before Roosevelt's inauguration in March 1933.

In order to gain Congressional and Presidential approval of funding, for a navy that they felt concern for both the age of vessels in the US fleet and the lack of new ship construction, they made some fairly simple economic arguments. Stressing, both publicly and privately, that new ship construction would enhance employment figures substantively because shipyard records indicated that 85% of construction funds were spent on labor costs and that if the anticipated public works funding program, National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), were used for ship construction the contracts for new ships could be awarded within 90 days of authorization with actual construction beginning almost immediately thereafter.

When Roosevelt signed NIRA into law on 16 June 1933, he had been convinced that it would be used to fund construction of new ships to create jobs in both public and private shipyards. Section 209(e) allowed for the President, within the terms and conditions of the London Naval Treaty of 1930, to authorize the construction of naval vessels. That same day Roosevelt signed an executive order giving approval to the expenditure of $238 million, over three years, for the construction of 32 new ships, this also included provisions for two Erie-class gunboats.

Henry L. Roosevelt, Assistant Secretary of the Navy, announced, within a week of NIRA being signed, that the construction of the two Erie-class gunboats would be awarded to the New York Naval Yard and the Charleston Naval Yard, at a cost reported anywhere from $2 million and $4 million, in various press accounts. Later, in December 1937, at hearings before the House Appropriations Committee, it was reported by the Navy Department that the cost of the Eries construction and machinery was actually $4,700,216, with her armor, armament and ammunition costing an addition $1,347,000, for a total cost of $6,047,216. In less than 90 days, 1 September 1933, the contracts for the construction of all 32 NIRA funded vessels, and their names, was announced by the Navy Department.

Design
The Erie class had a standard displacement of 2,000 long tons with a service displacement of . They were  in length overall, while they were  at the waterline. They had an extreme beam of  with a mean draft of  at standard displacement.

The Eries were powered by two Babcock and Wilcox boilers driving two Parsons geared turbine that  produced .

They were armed with four new model 6-inch/47 caliber Mark 17 guns, that were only used in the Eries. Their anti-aircraft armament originally consisted of only four quadruple /75 caliber guns; these were later augmented with the addition of four  Oerlikon cannons. The Eries were also equipped with two Mark 6 depth charge roll-off racks that could hold 15 depth charges each.

Since the London Treaty did not specify that armor plating could not be used Navy officials decided that armor plating was allowed. They were not completely armored but they did have some. There was a  side belt armor over the vital spaces. The 6-inch guns were protected by  armor gun shields. They had  armor on the main deck and  armor on the conning tower.

Ships in class

References

Bibliography

External links
USSEriePG50.org - History and photos of the ship & crew
Erie History and Report on Salvage

Erie (PG-50)
Charleston (PG-51)
Erie
Charleston
Category:World War II patrol vessels of the United States
Category:World War II shipwrecks in the Caribbean Sea
Category:1936 ships
Category:Ships of the Massachusetts Maritime Academy