L 12526 Official Journal of the European Union 14.5.2011 DECISIONS COMMISSION DECISION of 13 May 2011 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2011/279/EU) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (') (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof, After consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: O] 0] A. PROCEDURE By Regulation (EU) No 1036/2010 (?), the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Following the adoption of the provisional anti-dumping measures, the Commission continued the investigation of dumping, injury and Union interest. The investigation confirmed the provisional findings of injurious dumping relating to these imports. The definitive findings and conclusions of the investi- gation are set out in Council Regulation (EU) No 464 L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51. L 298, 16.11.2010, p. 27. (6) of 11 May 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina (%) (the ‘product concerned’). B. UNDERTAKING Subsequent to the adoption of provisional anti-dumping measures, the cooperating exporting producer in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Alumina d.o.o. Zvornik, together with its related company in the Union, AB Kauno Tiekimas filialas ‘Kauno Tiekimas’, located in Kaunas, Lithuania, offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation. In this undertaking offer, both companies offered to sell the product concerned at or above price levels which eliminate the injurious effects of dumping found during the investi- gation. The minimum import price (MIP) offer from the companies was based on the normal value calculated for the investigation period. The undertaking offer also contained the provision that the sales of the product concerned would be shipped directly from Alumina d.o.0. Zvornik to the first inde- pendent customer in the Union and invoiced either from Alumina d.o.o. Zvornik to the first independent customer in the Union or invoiced directly by Kauno. Furthermore, the companies offered to establish a link between the transfer invoices concerning the product concerned issued by Alumina d.o.o Zvornik to Kauno Tiekimas and the resale invoices to the first independent customer in the Union by Kauno Tiekimas. (%) See page 1 of this Official Journal.