28.3.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 90/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 295/2013 of 21 March 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in Taiwan following a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, of the basic Regulation. That investigation is ongoing in parallel and will be concluded in a separate legal act. B. CURRENT PROCEDURE 1. Request for a review Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of (4)  The Commission has received a request to initiate a ‘new 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic from countries not members of the European Community (') Regulation. The request was lodged by Lealea Enterprise (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof, Co., Ltd (the applicant), an exporting producer in Taiwan (‘the country concerned’). Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, (5)  The applicant claimed that it did not export the product concerned to the Union during the period of investi- gation, ie. the period from 1 October 1998 to Whereas: 30 September 1999 (the original investigation period’). A. MEASURES IN FORCE (6)  Furthermore, the applicapt claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of the product (1) Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 (2) imposed a definitive con.cerned. which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene anti-dumping measures. terephthalate originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation. (7)  The applicant further claimed that it had begun exporting the product concerned to the Union after the end of the original investigation period. (2)  Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (%), decided that the abovementioned measures 2. Initiation of a new exporter review should be maintained. (8)  The Commission examined the prima facie evidence (3) By notice, published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 24 February 2012 (¥, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated another expiry review of the relevant measures pursuant to Article 11(2) () O] L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51. () 0] L 301, 30.11.2000, p. 21. () OL'L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 59. (4 0] C 55, 24.2.2012, p. 4. submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation. After consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EU) No 653/2012 (), a review of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 with regard to the applicant. () OJ L 188, 18.7.2012, p. 8.