L 157/80 Official Journal of the European Union 27.5.2014 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 569/2014 of 23 May 2014 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 imposing a definitive anti- dumping duty on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (!) (the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof, Whereas: A. MEASURES IN FORCE (1) In October 2005, the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA), originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) by Regulation (EC) No 1631/2005 (3 (‘the original Regulation’). The anti-dumping duty rates ranged from 7,3 % to 42,6 %. (2) By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 855/2010 (%), the Council amended the original Regulation by lowering the anti-dumping duty rate for one exporting producer to 3,2 %. (3)  Following an expiry review, pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping measures consisting of individual duties ranging from 3,2 % to 40,5 % with a residual duty of 42,6 % on imports of TCCA originating in the PRC by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 (*). B. CURRENT PROCEDURE 1. Request for a review (40 On 3 May 2013, the European Commission (the Commission’) received a request to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation. The request was lodged by Liaocheng City Zhonglian Industry Co. Ltd (the applicant), an exporting producer in PRC. (5)  The applicant claimed that it did not export the TCCA to the Union during the original period of investigation, i.e. the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘the original investigation period’). (6)  Furthermore, the applicant claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of TCCA which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping measures. (7)  The applicant further claimed that it had begun exporting TCCA to the Union after the end of the original inves- tigation period. 2. Initiation of a new exporter review (8)  The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation. After consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated by Regulation (EU) No 809/2013 (°), a review of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 with regard to the applicant. J L 343,22.12.2009, p. 51. JL261,7.10.2005,p. 1. JL254,29.9.2010,p. 1. J L 346,30.12.2011, p. 6. JL229,28.8.2013,p. 2. 00000