26.3.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 86/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 285/2013 of 21 March 2013 terminating the partial reopening of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America and terminating the expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) and the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, (3 On 19 January 2010 and following a third expiry review investigation, the anti-dumping duties on imports of ethanolamines originating in the USA were imposed for . - two more years by Council Implementing Regulation [I-Jlixif(l)rrllg regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European (EU) No 542010 () (the ‘third expiry review Regu- ’ lation’). Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports 1 " hemical ) from countries not members of the European Community (') @ O}rll 9.A¥r1f.12£1)10, T el.D oW Cfemma ‘Clompar;y (DOV‘; (the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(2) and Chemical) filed an application for partial annulment o Article 11(2) and (3) thereof, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010. Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European o Commission after having consulted the Advisory Committee, (5)  On 12. March 20.11’ the Eurf)pean ‘Comml.ss10n (the ‘Commission’) published a Notice of impending expiry in the Official Journal (). Whereas: (6)  Following a request lodged by BASF AG, Ineos Europe 1. PROCEDURE AG, and Sasol Germany GmbH (the ‘Union industry’), the . e Commission initiated an expiry review on 21 January 1.1 Existing measures 2012 (the fourth expiry review’) (7). (1) On 2 February 1994, the Council imposed, by Regu- lation (EC) No 229/94 (3 (the original Regulation’), definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of ethano- lamines (‘produc’[. con‘cerne’d’) originating in the United (7) A partial interim review limited to dumping as regards States of America (USA). On 20 July 2000 and Dow Chemical was initiated on 11 April 2012 (8). following an expiry review investigation, these measures were extended for five years by Council Regulation (EC) No 1603/2000 (%) (the ‘first expiry review Regulation’). (8)  Following an application lodged (°) on 9 April 2010, the (2)  On 23 October 2006, following the second expiry review investigation, the measures were extended for five more years by Council Regulation (EC) No 1583/2006 (%) (the ‘second expiry review Regulation). () O] L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51. () O] L 28, 2.2.1994, p. 40. () O] L 185, 25.7.2000, p. 1. (4 O] L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 2. () ©) () ) 0 General Court annulled by its judgment of 8 May 2012 in Case T-158/10 ('%) (the Judgment’), the third expiry review Regulation in so far as it concerns Dow Chemical. L 17, 22.1.2010, p. 1. C 79, 12.3.2011, p. 20. C 18, 21.1.2012, p. 16. C 103, 11.4.2012, p. 8. C 161, 9.4.2010, p. 44. (19) Case T-158/10 The Dow Chemical Company v Council [2012] ECR 1L