L 192/42 Official Journal of the European Union 1.7.2014 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 727/2014 of 30 June 2014 initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China, repealing the duty with regard to imports from one exporter in this country and making these imports subject to registration THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (') (the basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 11(4) thereof, After informing the Member States, Whereas: 1. REQUEST (1) The European Commission (‘Commission’) has received a request for a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation. (2)  The request was lodged on 4 January 2014 by Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co. Ltd (the applicant’), an exporting producer in the People’s Republic of China (PRC’) of trichloroisocyanuric acid. 2. PRODUCT (3)  The product under review is trichloroisocyanuric acid and preparations thereof (TCCA), also referred to as ‘symclosene’ under the international non-proprietary name (INN), currently falling within CN codes ex 2933 69 80 and ex 3808 94 20 (TARIC codes 2933 69 80 70 and 3808 94 20 20), and originating in the PRC (‘the product under review’). 3. EXISTING MEASURES (4)  The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 (3 under which imports into the Union of the product under review originating in the PRC, including the product produced by the applicant, are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty of 42,6 % with the exception of several companies specially mentioned in Article 1(2) of that Regulation which are subject to indi- vidual duty rates. 4. GROUNDS (5)  The applicant claims that it did not export the product under review to the Union during the period of investiga- tion on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e. the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (the original investigation period). (6)  Furthermore, the applicant claims that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product under review which are subject to the above-mentioned anti-dumping measures. (7)  The applicant further claims that it has begun exporting the product under review to the Union after the end of the original investigation period. 5. PROCEDURE (8)  Union producers known to be concerned have been informed of the request for a review and have been given an opportunity to comment. () OJL343,22.12.2009,p. 51. () OJL346,30.12.2011,p. 6.