16.1.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 11/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 21/2013 of 10 January 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Taiwan and Thailand, whether declared as originating in Taiwan and Thailand or not THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European fibres consigned from Taiwan and Thailand, whether declared as originating in Taiwan and Thailand or not, subject to registration. Union, (3)  The request was lodged by Saint-Gobain Adfors CZ s.r.o., Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of ;l;olna‘text lfor}alfeldolgozq N Muszak1s;0vet—gyarto B, . ) . almieras ‘Stikla Skiedra’ AS and Vitrulan Technical 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports Textiles GmbH. four Uni J f certai from countries not members of the European Community (') ex}llefs b m ¢ 10 ur f.bnlon procucers of certan open (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof, mesh 1abrics of glass Hres. Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, (4)  The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence that following the imposition of the measures in force, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving Whereas: exports from the PRC, Taiwan and Thailand to the Union occurred, for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition 1. PROCEDURE of the measures in force. This change in the pattern of 1.1. Existing measures trade stemmed allegedly from the transhipment of certain o open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC (1) By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 (3 (the via Taiwan and Thailand. original Regulation) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 62,9 % on imports of certain ) ) open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the (5) Furthe.rmore, the evidence pomted‘to the fact that Fhe People’s Republic of China (the PRC) for all other remed1a.l effects of the measures in force were being companies than the ones mentioned in Article 1(2) and uqdermlned both in terms of quantity apd price. The Annex I to that Regulation. These measures will here- evidence showed that these increased imports  from inafter be referred to as ‘the measures in force’ and the Taiwan a.nd Tha.lland were mac.le at prices bel(?w th.e investigation that led to the measures imposed by the non-injurious price established in the original investi- original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as gatior. ‘the original investigation’. (6)  Finally, there was evidence that prices of certain open 1.2. Request mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Taiwan and Thailand were dumped in relation to the normal value (2 On 10 April 2012, the European Commission (the established during the original investigation. Commission’) received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping 1.3. Initiation measures imposed on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC and to (7)  Having determined, after consulting the Advisory () ) 0] 0] make imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51. L 204, 9.8.2011, p. 1. Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, initiated an investigation by Commission