No L 128/6 Official Journal of the European Communities 13. 6. 95 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1326/95 of 6 June 1995 opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for live fry and juveniles of sea bream (Sparus aurata) and bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), originating in Ceuta THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular the final subparagraph of Article 25 (4) thereof, Having regard to Article 3 (3) of Protocol 2 to the Act of Accession, concerning the Canary Islands and Ceuta and Melilla, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parlia- ment (), Whereas, by virtue of Article 3 (2) of the said Protocol 2, certain fishery products originating in Ceuta and Melilla are eligible, as from 1 January 1993, for exemption from customs duties in the customs territory of the Commu- nity ; whereas that exemption is to be granted within the limit of tariff quotas calculated by product with reference to the average quantities actually disposed of during 1982, 1983 and 1984 in that part of Spain which is included in the customs territory of the Community or exported to the Community as at present constituted ; Whereas the products originating in Ceuta which have enjoyed the benefit of the tariff arrangements set up by Protocol 2 are no longer exported to the Community because of a decrease in volume of fish catches put on to the market ; whereas the tariff quotas opened for Ceuta were not extended beyond 31 December 1992 on this account ; whereas live fry and juveniles of sea bream and bass henceforth replace these products in trade with the Community ; Whereas in 1993 Ceuta exported to the Community 2,5 tonnes of live fry and juveniles of sea bream and bass of CN code ex 0301 99 90 ; whereas these products, while covered by Article 3 of the Protocol in question, are, however, ineligible for the abovementioned tariff quotas because aquaculture was started only recently in Ceuta; Whereas Ceuta’s location as an enclave on the African continent poses specific problems; whereas the lack of both agriculture and industry sectors leaves fishing as Ceuta’s primary sector ; whereas, since the crisis is occur- ring in that sector, aquaculture has the potential to offer () O] No C 18, 23. 1. 1995, p. 426. Ceuta’s economic operators an alternative source of income to sea fishing; Whereas the Community accords some non-member countries preferential tariff treatment in the form of exemption from customs duties for products of CN code 0301 99 90 ; whereas steps should be taken to ensure that the tariff treatment of such products originating in Ceuta and imported into the Community is comparable to that accorded to certain non-member countries ; whereas the tariff arrangements applied to Ceuta need to be adjusted accordingly ; Whereas the joint declaration on Protocol 2 concerning the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla is intended to permit the substitution of products covered by Article 3 of the Protocol in question ; Whereas the Kingdom of Spain has asked the Commis- sion to open a zero-duty Community tariff quota for live fry and juveniles of sea bream and bass originating in Ceuta ; Whereas a zero-duty Community tariff quota should therefore be opened for the products in question and the annual quota volume fixed on the basis of annual produc- tion at three million individual fish ; whereas steps should be taken, order to follow the market trends for these products, to open this quota in an initial stage for the period 1 January to 31 December 1995 ; whereas applica- tion of the tariff quota is subject to compliance with the rules laid down for the common organization of the markets ; ' Whereas it is, in particular, necessary to guarantee all Community importers equal and continuous access to the quota and ensure the uninterrupted application of the rate laid down for the quota to all imports of the products in question into all Member States until the quota is exhausted ; Whereas it is for the Community, in compliance with its international obligations, to decide to open tariff quotas ; whereas there is, however, no reason why the Member States should not be authorized, in the interest of the common efficient administration of the quota, to draw from the quota volumes the quantities needed to cover actual imports ; whereas, however, this method of admi- nistration calls for close cooperation between the Member States and the Commission, which must in particular be able to monitor the rate at which the quota volumes are used up and inform the Member States accordingly,