8. 10. 96 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 254/49 COMMISSION DECISION of 24 June 1996 on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20 (2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards sanitary appliances (Text with EEA relevance) (96/578/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products ('), as amended by Direc- tive 93/68/EEC (3), and in particular Article 13 (4) thereof, Whereas the Commission is required to select, as between the two procedures under Article 13 (3) of Directive 89/106/EEC for attesting the conformity of a product, the ‘least onerous possible procedure consistent with safety’; whereas this means that it is necessary to decide whether, for a given product or family of products, the existence of a factory production control system under the responsi- bility of the manufacturer is a necessary and sufficient condition for an attestation of conformity, or whether, for reasons related to compliance with the criteria mentioned in Article 13 (4), the intervention of an approved certifica- tion body is therefore required; Whereas Article 13 (4) requires that the procedure thus determined must be indicated in the mandates and in the technical specifications; whereas, therefore, it is desirable to define the concept of products or family of products as used in the mandates and in the technical specifications; Whereas the two procedures provided for in Article 13 (3) are described in detail in Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC; whereas it is necessary therefore to specify clearly the methods by which the two procedures must be implemented, by reference to Annex III, for each product or family of products, since Annex IIl gives preference to certain systems; Whereas the procedure referred to in point (a) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in the first possi- bility, without continuous surveillance, and the second and third possibilities of point (ii) of section 2 of Annex III, and the procedure referred to in point (b) of Article 13 (3) corresponds to the systems set out in point (i) of section 2 of Annex III, and in the first possibility, with () OJ No L 40, 11. 2. 1989, p. 12. () OJ No L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1. continuous surveillance, of point (ii) of section 2 of Annex 1L, Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Construction, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The products and families of products set out in Annex I shall have their conformity attested by a procedure whereby the manufacturer has under its sole responsibility a factory production control system ensuring that the product is in conformity with the relevant technical speci- fications. Article 2 The products set out in Annex II shall have their confor- mity attested by a procedure whereby, in addition to a factory production control system operated by the manu- facturer, an approved certification body is involved in assessment and surveillance of the production control or of the product itself. Article 3 The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex III shall be indicated in mandates for harmonized standards. Article 4 This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 24 June 1996. For the Commission Martin BANGEMANN Member of the Commission