31.3.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 91/37 (Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory) DECISIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 26 September 2006 on State aid C 42/2005 (ex NN 66/2005; ex N 195/2005) implemented by the Slovak Republic for Konas, s.r.o. (notified under document number C(2006) 4205) (Only the Slovak version is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/204[EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof, Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above (!) and having regard to their comments, Whereas: (2) I. PROCEDURE By letter of 11 April 2005, registered as received on 19 April 2005, Slovakia notified the Commission that it intended to grant restructuring aid to the company Konas, sr.o. It provided additional information by letters of 30 June 2005, registered as received on 12 July 2005, and of 5 September 2005, registered as received on 8 September 2005, replying to the Commission’s letters of 31 May 2005 and 28 July 2005 respectively. In the course of this Exchange of Letters it became apparent that the aid in question had been implemented () O] C 323, 20.12.2005, p. 25. in contravention of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty. The aid was therefore classified as unlawful aid and given a new case number (NN 66/2005). By letter of 9 November 2005, the Commission informed Slovakia that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid. The Commission decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (?). The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure. The Slovak authorities submitted their observations by letter of 13 December 2005, registered as received on 20 December 2005. Slovakia submitted additional infor- mation by letter of 3 January 2006, registered as received on 10 January 2006. The Commission received comments from one interested party (the recipient) by letter of 30 November 2005, registered as received on 6 December 2005. It forwarded them to Slovakia, which was given the opportunity to react and did so by sending its own comments by letter dated 9 March 2006, registered as received on 15 March 2006. (®) See footnote 1.