No L 179/40 Official Journal of the European Communities 26.7.95 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1870/95 of 26 July 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 334/93 laying down detailed implementing rules for the use of land set aside for the provision of materials for the manufacture within the Community of products not primarily intended for human or animal consumption and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2595/93 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 as regards the use of land set aside for the production of multiannual raw materials for the manufacture within the Community of products not intended for human or animal consumption THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for produ- cers of certain arable crops('), a last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1664/95 (%), in particular Article 12 thereof, Having regard to Council Decision 93/355/EEC of 8 June 1993 concerning the conclusion of a Memorandum of Understanding on certain oil seeds between the Euro- pean Economic Community and the United States of America within the framework of the GATT (), in parti- cular point 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding on oil seeds, Whereas experience has shown that Commission Regula- tion (EEC) No 334/93 (%), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 608/94 (%), may be simplified, in order to avoid admi- nistrative difficulties whilst not diminishing -effective control of the scheme; Whereas it is appropriate in providing implementing measures to distinguish in the same Regulation between raw materials which have the potential to be used for human or animal consumption and those which do not have that potential ; whereas it is therefore necessary to repeal Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2595/93 (%); Whereas it is desirable to allow Jerusalem artichokes and chicory roots without compensation on set-aside land provided that this does not have a detrimental effect on the sugar market ; whereas it is nevertheless necessary to ensure that such cultivation is in conformity with the rules relating to the use of set-aside land for the growing of non-food crops; whereas a security should be lodged () OJ No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 12. () O] No L 158, 8. 7. 1995, p. 13. () O] No L 147, 18. 6. 1993, p. 25. () O] No L 38, 16. 2. 1993, p. 12. % O] No L 77, 19. 3. 1994, p. 7. (§ OF No L 238, 23. 9. 1993, p. 21. notwithstanding the fact that no compensation is payable ; Whereas, for reasons of clarity, it is appropriate to specify that equivalent quantities of intermediate or by-products to those resulting from the harvested raw material may be used in the scheme; whereas, when equivalents to the harvested raw material, or intermediate or by-products resulting from the harvested raw material are used in the scheme originating in a Member State other than that where the raw material is harvested, it is necessary for the Member States to inform each other of the transaction so that appropriate controls may be made ; Whereras contracts are required prior to the first sowing ; whereas at the time when raw materials were sown, in Austria, Finland and Sweden, those countries were not yet Member States and were, therefore, not subject to such requirement ; whereas for the 1995, producers in those Member States should be allowed to make contracts after sowing ; Whereas, in order to comply with the Memorandum of Understanding on certain oil seeds between the European Economic Community and the United States of America within the framework of the GATT, it is necessary to introduce a monitoring system to assess the quantities of by-products destined for human or animal consumption, in terms of soya bean meal equivalents, resulting from rapeseeds, colza seeds, sunflower seceds and soya beans grown on set-aside land for purposes other than human or animal consumption ; Whereas it is appropriate to clarify under which condi- tions contracts may be amended without the claimant’s right to compensation being lost; Whereas it would be administratively more effective for the non-farming signatory of the contracts to deposit a copy of the contract by specific dates in respect of raw materials which are sown during different period of the year ; Whereas Member States should determine a date by which the non-farming signatory of the contract must confirm delivery of the raw material, to ensure that compensation is paid to the farmer by the specified date ;