L 220/8 Official Journal of the European Union 3.9.2003 COMMISSION DECISION of 28 August 2003 approving programmes for the purpose of obtaining the status of approved zones and of approved farms in non-approved zones with regard to viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) and infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN) in fish (notified under document number C(2003) 3101) (Text with EEA relevance) (2003/634/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (), as last amended by Directive 98/45/EC (3), and in particular Article 10(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Pursuant to Directive 91/67/EEC a Member State may submit to the Commission a programme designed to enable it subsequently to initiate the procedures for a zone or a farm situated in a non-approved zone to obtain the status of approved zone or approved farm situated in a non-approved zone, as regards one or more of the fish diseases viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) and infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN). (2)  Certain Member States submitted such programmes, which were approved by Commission Decision 2002/ 304/EC (), as last amended by Decision 2003/376/ EC (4. (3) By letters dated 12 March 2003 and 12 June 2003, the veterinary authority of Finland asked for an amendment to the programme listed in Annex I(6B) to Decision 2002/304/EC. In order to preserve the vulnerable species Baltic salmon (Salmo salar), sea trout (Salmo trutta m trutta) and whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus lavaretus), restocking in the River Kymijoki and River Summanjoki watercourse is necessary. Finland has submitted amend- ments to its programme providing for transfer of live eggs from wild fish from the Pyhtdd restriction zone provided that all appropriate measures are taken to ensure that the eggs are free of VHS and IHN. Delimita- tion of the zone as established in Annex I to Decision 2002/304/EC does not change. (4) By letter dated 4 March 2003, the veterinary authority of Italy proposed an amendment to the programme listed in point 5.1 of Annex I to Decision 2002/304/EC. In order to increase the level of protection as regards introduction of fish into the area covered by the programme, live trout and other fish destined to restau- rants for direct consumption as well as rainbow trout 1 () OJ L 46, 19.2.1991, p. 1. () OJL 189, 3.7.1998, p. 12. () OJ L 104, 20.4.2002, p. 37. () OJ L 130, 27.5.2003, p. 21. intended for introduction into certain artificial lakes or fish water, must come from farms or areas recognised as free of VHS and IHN. Delimitation of the zone as estab- lished in Annex I to Decision 2002/304/EC does not change. (5)  The amendments submitted have been found to comply with Article 10 of Directive 91/67/EEC and should therefore be approved. (6)  Decision 2002/304/EC has been amended several times. In the interests of clarity and rationality, it should be repealed and replaced by this Decision. (7)  The measures provided for in this Decision are in accor- dance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Atrticle 1 1.  The programmes listed in Annex I, submitted under Article 10(1) of Directive 91/67/EEC for the purpose of obtaining approved zone status with regard to one or more of the fish diseases viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS) and infectious haematopoietic necrosis (IHN), are hereby approved. 2. The programmes listed in Annex II, submitted under Article 10(1) of Directive 91/67/EEC for the purpose of obtaining status as approved farm situated in a non-approved zone with regard to one or more of the fish diseases VHS and [HN, are hereby approved. Atticle 2 The Member States concerned shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the approved programmes. Article 3 Decision 2002/304/EC is hereby repealed. References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as refer- ences to this Decision.