19. 3. 94 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 77/7 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 608/94 of 18 March 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 334/93 laying down detailed implementing rules for the use of land set aside for the provision of materials for the manufacture within the Community of products not primarily intended for human or animal consumption THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for produ- cers of certain arable crops ('), as last amended by Regula- tion (EC) No 232/94(%), and in particular Article 13 thereof, Whereas Article 7 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 allows set-aside land to be used for the provision of mate- rials for the manufacture within the Community of products not primarily intended for human or animal consumption, provided that effective control systems are applied ; Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 enables the Commission to set conditions for the cultivation of crops . without compensation on set-aside land; whereas it is desirable to allow the cultivation of sugar beet without compensation on set-aside land provided that this does not have a detrimental effect on the sugar market; whereas it is nevertheless necessary to ensure that such cultivation is in conformity with the rules relating to the use of set-aside land for the growing of non-food crops ; Whereas a security should be lodged notwithstanding the fact that no compensation is payable; whereas the re- quirement for contracts to be signed before the sowing of “sugar beet would lead to practical difficulties in the first year of application ; : Whereas it is necessary to clarify that no raw materials, intermediate products, end-products, co-products or by-products grown on set-aside land should be eligible for measures financed pursuant to Article 1 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 (°), as last amended by Regu- lation (EEC) No 2048/88 (*); Whereas experience has shown that it is necessary for the claimant to lose his right to compensation because of a delay by the collector or first processor, as the case may be, in depositing a copy of the contract with his competent authority ; Whereas it is necessary for the effective control of the scheme that a collector should inform his competent () OJ No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 12. () OJ No L 30, 3. 2. 1994, p. 7. () O No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 13. () OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 1. authority of the details of the first processor within 20 working days of delivery of the raw material to that first processor ; Whereas it should be specified that the transport within the Community covered by a control copy T 5 should not be limited to end-products intended for export to third countries ; Whereas in the light of experience it is not necessary to require processors to keep records on a daily basis; whereas the frequency of record-keeping should be deter- mined by the competent authority ; Whereas certain raw materials of a pluriannual nature are eligible for compensation pursuant to Commission Regu- lation (EEC) No 2595/93(%); whereas it is therefore appropriate to delete these raw materials from the list of eligible raw materials in Annex I to Commission Regula- tion (EEC) No 334/93(%); Whereas it is desirable to amend the list of end-products which are to be considered as permissible uses for non- food crops grown on set-aside land; Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Joint Management Committee for Cereals, Oils and Fats and Dried Fodder and Sugar, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : Article 1 Regulation (EEC) No 334/93 is amended as follows: 1. The following Article 2a is inserted : ‘Article 2a No compensation, within the meaning of Article 2 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92, shall be payable in respect of land on which sugar beet is grown. All the provisions of this Regulation shall, however, apply where sugar beet is grown on set-aside land in the same way that they would apply if compensation were payable.’; () OJ No L 238, 23. 9. 1993, p. 21. () OJ No L 38, 16. 2. 1993, p. 12.