26.1.2008 Official Journal of the European Union L 231 (Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory) REGULATIONS COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 63/2008 of 21 January 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of dihydromyrcenol originating in India THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (') (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 9 thereof, Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: A. PROCEDURE 1. Provisional measures (1)  On 27 July 2007, the Commission imposed by Regu- lation (EC) No 896/2007 (3 (the provisional Regulation) a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of dihydromyrcenol originating in India (the country concerned). (2) It is recalled that the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 (the investigation period or IP). The examination of trends relevant for the injury analysis covered the period from 1 January 2003 to the end of the IP (the period considered). (") OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17). () O] L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 3. G) The addresses of the Community producers listed in recital 7 of the provisional Regulation are rectified as follows: — Destilaciones Bordas  Chinchurreta S.A., Dos Hermanas (Sevilla), Spain, — Sensient Fragrances S.A., Granada, Spain, — Takasago International Chemicals (Europe) S.A., Murcia, Spain. 2. Subsequent procedure Following the imposition of a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of dihydromyrcenol originating in India, all parties received disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on which the provisional Regulation was based (the provisional disclosure). All parties were granted a period within which they could make written and oral representations in relation to this disclosure. Some interested parties submitted comments in writing. Those parties who so requested were also granted an opportunity to be heard orally. The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings. All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti- dumping duty and the definitive collection of amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (the ‘final disclosure’). The interested parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure. The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.