27. 3. 84 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 83/9 (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 23 March 1984 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain iron or steel angles, shapes and sections originating in Romania, and terminating that proceeding (84/182/EEC) - THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3017/79 of 20 December 1979 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community ('), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1580/82 (3, and in particular Article 10 thereof, After consultations within the Advisory Committee as provided for under the above Regulation, A. Procedure (1) In October 1982 the Commission received a complaint lodged by the ‘Comité d’étude euro- péen du profilage a froid’ on behalf of its German, Dutch and Belgian member companies who produce certain iron or steel angles, shapes and sections and whose collective output consti- tutes a major proportion of Community produc- tion of the product in question. The complaint contained evidence of dumping and of material injury resulting therefrom, which were considered () OJ No L 339, 31. 12. 1979, p. 1. () O] No L 178, 22. 6. 1982, p. 9. sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding. The Commission accordingly announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (°) the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports - into the Community of certain iron or steel angles, shapes and sections falling within Common Customs Tariff subheading ex 73.11 A IIT and corresponding to NIMEXE code 73.11-31, originating in Romania, and commenced an investigation. (2) The Commission officially so advised the exporter and the importer known to be concerned and gave the parties directly concerned the opportu- nity to make known their views in writing and to request a hearing. The majority of the Community producers, the exporter and the importer made their views known in writing. The exporter and the importer requested and have been granted hearings. The exporter requested an opportunity to meet the complainants for the purpose of presenting their opposing views; the complainants stated, however, that at this stage of the proceeding the situation was so evident that such a meeting was not warranted. No submissions were made by or on behalf of Community purchasers or processors of the product in question. () O] No C 109, 23. 4. 1983, p. 2.