L 350/24 Official Journal of the European Union 30.12.2008 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1354/2008 of 18 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India and Regulation (EC) No 1629/2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not member of the European Community (') (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 15 and 19 thereof, Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: A. PROCEDURE I. Previous investigation and existing measures (1) The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 (3, imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of graphite electrodes of a kind used for electric furnaces, with an apparent density of 1,65 g/cm® or more and an electrical resistance of 6,0 pQ.m or less, falling within CN code ex 854511 00 and nipples used for such elec- trodes, falling within CN code ex 8545 90 90 whether imported together or separately, originating in India. The rate of the duty ranges between 7,0 % and 15,7 % for individually named exporters with a residual duty rate of 15,7 % imposed on imports from other exporters. (2) At the same time, by Regulation (EC) No 1629/2004 (3), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the same product originating in India. Il Initiation of a partial interim review (3)  Following the imposition of the definitive countervailing duty the Government of India (GOI) made submissions 0] L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. () O] L 295, 18.9.2004, p. 4. 0J L 295, 18.9.2004, p. 10. that the circumstances with regard to two subsidy schemes (the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme and the Income Tax Exemption under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act) have changed and that these changes are of a lasting nature. Consequently, it was argued that the level of subsidisation is likely to have decreased and thus measures that have been established partly on these schemes should be revised. (4)  The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the GOI and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation. After consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Commission initiated an ex officio partial interim review of the measures in force by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (*). (5)  The purpose of this partial interim review investigation is to assess the need for the continuation, removal or amendment of the existing measures in respect of those companies having benefited from one or both the changed subsidy schemes including, for those companies, in respect of other schemes where sufficient evidence is provided in line with the relevant provisions of the notice of initiation. [Il. Investigation period (6)  The investigation covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (the review investigation period or RIP). IV. Parties concerned by the investigation (7  The Commission officially informed the GOI, the two Indian exporting producers listed in the notice of initiation of the partial interim review, as well as the Community producers, of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation. Interested parties had the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing. The written and oral comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account. () O] C 230, 2.10.2007, p. 9.