@inproceedings{verma-etal-2023-comparing,
    title = "Comparing and combining some popular {NER} approaches on Biomedical tasks",
    author = "Verma, Harsh  and
      Bergler, Sabine  and
      Tahaei, Narjesossadat",
    editor = "Demner-fushman, Dina  and
      Ananiadou, Sophia  and
      Cohen, Kevin",
    booktitle = "The 22nd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing and BioNLP Shared Tasks",
    month = jul,
    year = "2023",
    address = "Toronto, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.bionlp-1.24",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.bionlp-1.24",
    pages = "273--279",
    abstract = "We compare three simple and popular approaches for NER: 1) SEQ (sequence labeling with a linear token classifier) 2) SeqCRF (sequence labeling with Conditional Random Fields), and 3) SpanPred (span prediction with boundary token embeddings). We compare the approaches on 4 biomedical NER tasks: GENIA, NCBI-Disease, LivingNER (Spanish), and SocialDisNER (Spanish). The SpanPred model demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on LivingNER and SocialDisNER, improving F1 by 1.3 and 0.6 F1 respectively. The SeqCRF model also demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on LivingNER and SocialDisNER, improving F1 by 0.2 F1 and 0.7 respectively. The SEQ model is competitive with the state-of-the-art on LivingNER dataset. We explore some simple ways of combining the three approaches. We find that majority voting consistently gives high precision and high F1 across all 4 datasets. Lastly, we implement a system that learns to combine SEQ{'}s and SpanPred{'}s predictions, generating systems that give high recall and high F1 across all 4 datasets. On the GENIA dataset, we find that our learned combiner system significantly boosts F1(+1.2) and recall(+2.1) over the systems being combined.",
}

We compare three simple and popular approaches for NER: 1) SEQ (sequence labeling with a linear token classifier) 2) SeqCRF (sequence labeling with Conditional Random Fields), and 3) SpanPred (span prediction with boundary token embeddings). We compare the approaches on 4 biomedical NER tasks: GENIA, NCBI-Disease, LivingNER (Spanish), and SocialDisNER (Spanish). The SpanPred model demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on LivingNER and SocialDisNER, improving F1 by 1.3 and 0.6 F1 respectively. The SeqCRF model also demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on LivingNER and SocialDisNER, improving F1 by 0.2 F1 and 0.7 respectively. The SEQ model is competitive with the state-of-the-art on LivingNER dataset. We explore some simple ways of combining the three approaches. We find that majority voting consistently gives high precision and high F1 across all 4 datasets. Lastly, we implement a system that learns to combine SEQ{'}s and SpanPred{'}s predictions, generating systems that give high recall and high F1 across all 4 datasets. On the GENIA dataset, we find that our learned combiner system significantly boosts F1(+1.2) and recall(+2.1) over the systems being combined.
Verma, Harsh Bergler, Sabine Tahaei, Narjesossadat
Comparing and combining some popular NER approaches on Biomedical tasks