diff --git "a/README.md" "b/README.md" --- "a/README.md" +++ "b/README.md" @@ -8,437 +8,308 @@ tags: - generated_from_trainer - dataset_size:53224 - loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss -base_model: jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en +base_model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 widget: -- source_sentence: are my notes shared with any third parties? - sentences: - - We may share data with social networks at your request. - - 'We may use the data we collect to:' - - Evernote is not in the business of selling or renting your information. - - 'Account information for third party services: If you interact with a third party - service when using our Sites, such as if you use a third party service to log-in - to our Sites (e.g., Facebook, Google, or Twitter), or if you share content from - our Sites through a third party social media service, the third party service - will send us information about you, such as information from your public profile, - if the third party service and your account settings allow such sharing.' - - With that in mind, when you purchase an item, your customer information may be - shared with other select companies whose products and services you may find useful - and those select companies will handle, store, retain, use, share and access personal - information in accordance with their own privacy policies, and we disclaim any - and all liability relating thereto. - - Usage activity, interactions within our apps - - where a third party claims that any content posted or uploaded by you to our Platform - constitutes a violation of their intellectual property rights, or of their right - to privacy. - - In addition, parts of the Service may be hosted by a third party on our behalf. -- source_sentence: which third party entities will have access to my data? - sentences: - - We also may share information about you with third parties whenever you consent - to or direct such sharing. - - All data transferred by us between your device and our services is encrypted. - - Processing your data in order to meet certain legal or regulatory obligations; - and - - In certain occasions, Khan Academy may share this data with business partners - to improve our services or offerings. - - We receive and store any information you enter on our Website or give us in any - other way. - - Does IMDb Share the Information It Receives? - - We also require that our suppliers protect such information from unauthorized - access, use, and disclosure. - - If Touchnote Limited or substantially all of its assets are acquired by a third - party, in which case personal data held by it about its customers will be one - of the transferred assets. -- source_sentence: ' - - In cases an agent is entrusted to perform any specific juristic act, if the agent - performs such act in accordance with the instructions of the principal, the principal - may not assert that the agent did not know a particular circumstance without negligence - which the principal did not know due to his/her negligence. - - ' +- source_sentence: ' A juridical person may not be a partner of a civil law union. ' sentences: - ' - Article 406 + Article 34 - If the subject matter of the claim is to be determined by a choice being made - from among more than one performance, the right to choose belongs to the obligor.. + An not-for-profit association or foundation that is involved in academic activities, + art, charity, worship, religion, or any other matter of public interest may be + established as a juridical person with the permission of the competent government + agency.. ' - ' - Article 494 - - (1) In the following cases, a performer may deposit the subject matter of the - performance with an official depository for the benefit of the obligee. In such - a case, the claim is extinguished when the performer makes the deposit: - - (i) the performer tenders the performance, and the obligee refuses to accept it; - or - - (ii) the obligee is unable to accept the performance. - - (2) The preceding paragraph also applies if the performer is unable to ascertain - the obligee;provided, however, that this does not apply if the performer is negligent - in this respect. - - Article 474 + Article 192 - (1) A third party may also perform an obligation. - - (2) A third party that has no legitimate interest in performing an obligation - may not perform the obligation against the will of the obligor;provided, however, - that this does not apply if the obligee did not know that the performance is against - the will of the obligor. - - (3) The third party prescribed in the preceding paragraph may not perform the - obligation against the will of the obligee;provided, however, that this does not - apply if the third party performs the obligation as requested by the obligor, - and the obligee knew this. - - (4) The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply if the nature - of an obligation does not permit the performance by a third party or if a party - manifests the intention to prohibit or restrict the performance by a third party.. + A person that commences the possession of movables peacefully and openly by a + transactional act acquires the rights that are exercised with respect to the movables + immediately if the person possesses it in good faith and without negligence.. ' - ' - Article 101 - - (1) If the validity of a manifestation of intention that an agent has made to - the other party is to be influenced by the absence of intention; by mistake, fraud, - or duress; or by the knowledge of or negligence in not knowing of a particular - circumstance; whether or not any such fact was present is decided as it concerns - the agent. + Article 550 - (2) If the validity of a manifestation of intention that the other party has made - to the agent is to be influenced by the recipient''s knowledge of or negligence - in not knowing of a particular circumstance, whether or not any such fact was - present is decided as it concerns the agent. - - (3) If an agent who has been entrusted with performing a specific juridical act - performs that act, the principal may not assert that the agent did not know of - any particular circumstance of which the principal knew. The same applies to any - circumstance of which the principal did not know due to the principal''s own negligence.. + Gifts not in writing may be cancelled by either party;provided, however, that + this does not apply to a portion of the gift for which performance has been completed.. ' -- source_sentence: Are times zones, (i.e. a geo-spatial frame of reference) considered - in age based regulations? Bob was born in British Columbia (GMT-7) on March 7th - at 11 p.m. local time. Alice was born the next day, March 8th, in Nova Scotia - (GMT-3) at 1 a.m. local time, which is 2 hours before Bob was born, due to the - time zone difference. Bob and Alice are in Vancouver (GMT-7). It is Bob's 19th - birthday. Bob is of legal drinking age according to Canadian law and the birthdate - listed on his driver's license, Alice is not. They both have a glass of wine with - dinner. The legality of drinking is based on age, so could Alice be arrested for - underage drinking based on the birth date listed in her driver's license even - though she is technically "older" than Bob based on a geo-spatial frame - of reference? Or would the law consider her to be of legal age based on the time - zone of her birth, and the exact time of day she drew her first breath when compared - to local time? +- source_sentence: In what forum would Iran sue Pakistan in for damages? According + to reports, Iran may claim $18 billion in damages from Pakistan for an unfinished + pipeline if Pakistan does not complete its part of it as agreed. What forum would + such a claim take place in? + sentences: + - One of the biggest problems here is in proof of injury attributable to an individual... + With asbestos, you can prove that direct exposure in a certain instance caused + a long-term harm. Just because you were around asbestos doesn't mean you get lung + cancer, so if you don't actually suffer any harm (or any harm yet), you won't + get awarded damages. Similarly with lead, you have to prove both the exposure, + the entity which exposed you to it, and harm that you suffered. Just being around + a lead pipe or paint doesn't mean you get damages, you need to have suffered harm. + The problem with second-hand smoke is that you can be exposed to it from many + different sources. Any problems you have (lung cancer) would need to be proven + as a direct consequence of one specific (or prolonged) exposure. I could see this + working if a non-smoking spouse developed cancer from a smoking spouse being exposed + to it for years, but you can't just say "I walked by Joe Camel in the street while + he was smoking now I have cancer and it is his fault". So the issue becomes who + is responsible for your damages. You can't narrow it down to one smoker (or even + cigarette smoke, as lung cancer can develop from other sources), so just proving + that your cause-effect is directly related to smoke will be difficult. After that + you can't say one single person caused it (unless they forcefully locked you in + a room and chain-smoked for a year). So who do you sue? All of smoking society? + You might just as well sue God for putting those people on earth, really the only + recourse you would have is to sue the tobacco companies, the individual smokers + are not going to be held liable as a group. + - The settlement was a politically motivated act to provide de facto disaster relief + and express a moral apology in a cash that there is no plausible way that the + U.S. would lose if it litigated the case on the merits. The articulated basis + for making the payment would not survive a seriously argued dispositive motion + from the United States government, either on behalf of the U.S. government itself, + or against the federal law enforcement officials involved under Bivens. A complaint + making such a claim would barely survive a motion for a Rule 11 sanction for making + a frivolous claim if the government pushed the point, and then, only on the theory + that it advanced a good faith argument for change in the law, not on the theory + that it was supported by existing law. The Parkland case was considerably weaker + than the Charleston shooter of 2015 case even, because Parkland involved a discretionary + law enforcement decision, while Charleston arguably involved a non-discretionary + administrative matter (although the government probably could have won that case + as well). + - This is an interesting hypothetical. In this scenario, Country Z does not have + jurisdiction to enforce such a law on foreign nationals, unless Country Z has + an extradition treaty with Country A. Generally, however, these types of laws + would never be enforced as they are egregious abuses of government, and could + possibly be elevated to the International Court of Justice if Country Z actually + charges any individuals with such a crime. In these instances, however, war is + a very unlikely scenario, since this would often be expensive and any escalation + would most likely be small skirmishes that would lead to an eventual ceasefire, + with the encouragement of the international community, without the involvement + of UN Peacekeeping troops. + - You could probably hire a Pennsylvania lawyer to intervene in the case on your + behalf and file a motion to seal the evidence in the case, and there is a good + chance that it would be granted, and quite possibly, unopposed by the parties. + But, the fact that it has already been made available to the public on the Internet + could cause the court to deny your request on the grounds that it is futile to + do so. + - How close is such a statement corresponding with the reality? Legally, such language + is a meaningless statement of future intent that at best makes clear that the + person making the statement isn't waiving any of their legal rights. Certainly, + no infringer would have standing to sue if they failed to do so. Whether a joint + venture member or foreign reseller could sue the company for failing to enforce + its IP rights is another question that presents itself very differently and depends + upon much more than what the warning labels state, such as the language in the + joint partnership or reseller's agreement with the copyright owner. Also, in criminal + copyright violation cases, even if the copyright owner asks for the maximum possible + consequences, the U.S. Justice Department is under no obligation whatsoever to + go along with that request. Likewise, a judge has no obligation to impose the + maximum penalty allowed by law following a criminal conviction, even if the copyright + owner and the U.S. Justice Department both request a maximum sentence for someone + who pleas guilty or is convicted of the offense following a trial. In practice, + something like 98% of federal criminal cases, and a similar percentage of federal + civil cases, result in agreed resolutions which result in less severe penalties + than the maximum penalties allowed by law. This happens as a result of a mutual + agreement to resolve the case with a guilty plea, or a settlement agreement in + a civil case, or both. Also, in practice, none of these companies, nor the federal + government's prosecutors, have the resources to press anything but the most clear + and serious copyright violation cases, and cases that are valuable for P.R. purposes. + Anything else is essentially a random lottery from myriad cases that could have + been brought in order to counteract the argument (both political and legal) that + their copyright protections are empty and completely unenforced is a large part + of the cases to which the statutes would make it seem that they apply. Also, in + a case brought by a joint venture owner or reseller for failure to enforce a copyright + which causes the partner damages, presumably in some sort of breach of contract + or breach of fiduciary duty action, there would be no way to prove damages from + all of the non-enforcement, since enforcing every known infringement would not + be cost effective and would reduce the net profits of everyone involved. + - 'Sure Obama can sue Trump for defamation. Libel is a civil offense and committing + libel is not a part of Trump''s role as president. Regarding official acts, the + President is immune. But not for personal acts. See Is the US President immune + from civil lawsuits? But a libel action would be difficult to win; they''re both + public figures, which makes the defamation threshold higher: Public officials + and figures have a harder time proving defamation. The public has a right to criticize + the people who govern them, so the least protection from defamation is given to + public officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their + behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation + and they must also prove that the defendant acted with "actual malice." Defamation + Law Made Simple | Nolo.com The "actual malice" part is interesting: In the landmark + 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court .... acknowledged + that in public discussions -- especially about public figures like politicians + -- mistakes can be made. If those mistakes are "honestly made," the Court said, + they should be protected from defamation actions. The court made a rule that public + officials could sue for statements made about their public conduct only if the + statements were made with "actual malice." "Actual malice" means that the person + who made the statement knew it wasn''t true, or didn''t care whether it was true + or not and was reckless with the truth -- for example, when someone has doubts + about the truth of a statement but does not bother to check further before publishing + it. (same link above) Could malice be proved? Was Trump reckless with the truth? + Could be. But would Obama sue? What''s the cost/benefit analysis to him and his + legacy, politically and personally? Trump was taking a political or personal risk + - or he''s being stupid - with such accusations, since he may feel invulnerable. + He has sued and been sued and settled many times: see Legal affairs of Donald + Trump I think both would not want to be in court; because once in court, they + (and their lawyers) both have subpoena power and both would have to answer nearly + any question put to them about their public (and possibly private; but not official) + lives. Trump has interestingly enough talked about "opening up the libel laws" + so he can more easily sue people. But if he did that, it cuts both ways: he would + be easier to take to court. See Can Libel Laws Be Changed Under Trump? In my opinion, + Obama is much better off ignoring Trump and letting the FBI, DOJ, Congress and + the Intel Community do their jobs - have the facts fall where they may - and and + not become a right-wing talk radio subject for the rest of his life, as well as + risk being deposed himself in court. Edit 3/21/17: From a timely piece in The + New Yorker: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-the-first-amendment-applies-to-trumps-presidency + While it is unlikely that former President Barack Obama would sue Trump for libel, + he very likely has a strong case. The First Amendment scholar Geoffrey Stone wrote + in the Chicago Sun-Times http://chicago.suntimes.com/opinion/opinion-trump-could-lose-lawsuit-for-libeling-obama/ + that “there seems no doubt that Trump’s statement was false, defamatory, and at + the very least made with reckless disregard for the truth.” That is the test for + damaging the reputation of a public figure or official: Trump either made his + assertions with knowledge of their falsity or with disregard of a high degree + of probability that they were false. Obama, Stone is confident, could prove that + Trump made his false charge, as the Supreme Court defined the standard, with “actual + malice.”' + - According to reports, one potential forum is the International Court of Arbitration. + All reports I see say that the agreement specifies that the forum will be an arbitration + forum. Whether it can be any arbitration forum or if it must be the ICC, or can + be selected from a list, depends on the specific wording of the Gas Sales and + Purchase Agreement of 2009, which I have not been able to find. + - Graffiti artists are routinely found financially liable for their work, but assertions + of copyright infringement by graffiti artists are vanishingly rare, so I don't + know if that has ever happened in that context. In many jurisdictions, filing + a lawsuit against someone waives any statute of limitations defense you may have + against counterclaims filed by the person you are suing in any related matter. + So, if that rule applies, a counterclaim for financial loss from graffiti could + be brought in a copyright infringement lawsuit, even though the statute of limitations + on the damages claim would otherwise have run. But, I don't know if such a rule + applies to copyright infringement claims filed in federal court. +- source_sentence: 'Q: is there some law or right thats says this is wrong. im 14 + and got my girlfriend pregnant her parents are saying she has to have an abortion + because having the baby can kill her and seriously hurt her and i looked it up + and if that was the case it would be a mandatory abortion and now they dont even + wanna tell if us shes gonna end up getting a abortion or keeping the baby there + had to be something that says they have to tell us something ' sentences: - - 'canada In Canada, there are the separate offences of: sexual assault (premised - on lack of consent, no matter by what means consent is lacking; R. v. G.F., 2021 - SCC 20) and administering a stupefying substance. If someone were to use a "substance - such as everyday alcohol" (I would reject the premise that this is "benign") - for the purpose of facilitating sexual assault, this would be an offence under - s. 246 of the Criminal Code. Section 246 makes it an offence for a person, "with - intent to enable or assist himself or another person to commit an indictable offence" - to administer or cause any person to take a "stupefying or overpowering drug, - matter, or thing." The Court of Appeal for Ontario has accepted that the - element of administering a stupefying thing could be established by oversupply - of alcohol. They have said that alcohol is a "stupefying substance" - (R. v. Vant, 2015 ONCA 481) and can support a conviction under s. 246. "Date - rape" has no legal significance and even criminologically, misframes the - circumstances in which people experience sexual assualt. Further, your premise - that intimate partner sexual assault "usually happens when someone uses narcotics - to drug another into an unconscious state" is not supported by the evidence. - While this is a criminological point, rather than a legal point, it is important - context for understanding such crimes. This 2005 study estimated that 4.6% of - intimate partner sexual assaults were facilitated by surreptitious drug use. These - two fact sheets describe the variety of circumstances, completely unrelated to - incapacitation by drugs, in which people experience intimate partner sexual assault/violence: - Fredericton Sexual Assault Crisis Centre Info Sheet; Centre for Research & - Education on Violence Against Women & Children Backgrounder on Intimate Partner - Sexual Violence.' - - 'Can the Secretary of State exempt people over 75 requiring a TV licence? Yes. - s.363(6) introduces the power to exempt those listed at (a) to (d) by way of Regulations. - s.6, paragraph 1 of the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004 - states: No fee shall be payable for a TV licence of a type referred to in the - first or second entry in column 1 of the table in Schedule 1 where— (a) the licence - is issued to a person aged 75 years or more or to a person who will attain that - age in the calendar month in which the licence is issued; and (b) the single place, - vehicle, vessel or caravan specified in the licence is the sole or main residence - of that person. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/regulation/6?timeline=false - The first and second entries in column 1 at Schedule 1 refer to black and white - or colour TVs in a domestic setting or business purposes. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/schedule/1?timeline=false' - - 'british-columbia I am not aware of any judicial consideration of this issue. - The Liquor Control and Licensing Act, s. 78(1) says: A minor must not, except - as provided under this Act or unless the minor does so with other lawful excuse, - ... consume liquor. (One of those exceptions are when the alcohol is supplied - by the minor''s parents, spouse or guardian in a residence for consumption in - the residence. There are other exceptions, too. But I''ll assume you''re asking - about a circumstance where no exception applies.) The Liquor Control and Licensing - Act defines a "minor" to be a person under the age of majority established - by the Age of Majority Act, which is age 19 today. The Liquor Control and Licensing - Act, s. 57 makes it an offence to contravene s. 78(1). The Interpretation Act, - s. 25.1 states that "A person reaches a particular age expressed in years - at the beginning of the relevant anniversary of the person''s birth date." - The Interpretation Act also clarifies that the reference to time "is a reference - to Pacific Standard Time" (or Pacific Daylight Saving Time, when it is in - effect). Thus, a person is a minor until "the beginning [in Pacific time] - of the relevant anniversary of the person''s birth date." It is most clear - in relation to the identification requirements when selling to a minor, but the - Regulations (s. 158) refer to the date of birth as displayed on the person''s - identification card. This all suggests that when consuming alcohol in the greater - Vancouver area, a person just about to reach the age of majority must wait until - the date in the Pacific time zone is that which is displayed on their identification. - Or barring any identification, until the date in the Pacific time zone is the - date that is the person''s birth date.' - - This is known as a retroactive or ex post facto law. Such laws are explicitly - forbidden by the US Constitution (Wikipedia reference), and are generally frowned - on in jurisdictions where the rule of law applies, partly because it is difficult - to prove criminal intent when your action was not at the time criminal. - - 'The place of birth on the birth certificate is where the child was actually born. - Indeed, usually it will be more specific than city and state or province and will - also identify a hospital or residence or other place where the birth happened. - So, for example, if a child is born to U.S. diplomats in Paris, France (in or - out of the embassy grounds), the birth certificate will say that the child was - born in Paris, France at Charles de Gaulle Hospital. But, that child will still - be a U.S. citizen in all likelihood, because that child''s mother, and/or married - father or unmarried father who acknowledges paternity, is a U.S. citizen (in all - likelihood) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401 and 1409. The child may or may not be - a French dual citizen depending upon the citizenship law of France. In the case - of a French diplomat who has a child born physically in Washington D.C. (inside - or outside the French embassy) the birth certificate will likewise state that - the child was born in Washington D.C. The French diplomat''s child, however, will - not be a U.S. citizen since Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution''s - first sentence (which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)) states: All persons - born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, - are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. But a - French diplomat''s child is not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the - United States, so the French diplomat''s child does not gain U.S. citizenship - at birth (assuming for simplicity''s sake that both of the child''s parents are - French citizens and are not U.S. citizens) despite the fact that the child was - born in the United States.' - - Bob has no defense Speeding in western-australia, as it is throughout australia, - is a strict liability offense. That means that intention to or knowledge that - you are breaking the law is not required. Don’t know the limit? Doesn’t matter, - you are still legally obliged to comply. However, all the way up the chain, from - the police officer, through the administrative arm to the judge, each person has - discretion to waive the infringement notice. Basically, they can do that if they - don’t think it’s “fair” on Bob in the circumstances. Given that Bob managed to - reach 40+km/h within 20m of a more than 90 degree corner I think the infringement - notice is very fair. Negligent Driving is possibly the more appropriate offense. - However, it’s possible to imagine circumstances where waiving the infringement - notice is fair. For example, if a speed limit sign has been removed or completely - obscured by foliage or a parked vehicle and Bob could show he was not familiar - with the area. The question on Alice is, from above, moot. - - 'canada It depends on what the mens rea requirement is. Mens rea if not specified - in a criminal offence In Canada, if this is a criminal offence, and a mens rea - is not specified in the Criminal Code, the presumption is that the mens rea would - be satisfied by recklessness, knowledge, willful blindness, or intention (Pappajohn - v. The Queen, [1980] 2 SCR 120; R. v. Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13). The prosecution would - have to show that Alice was at least subjectively aware of the risk that she was - doing XYZ during the prohibited hours and proceeded nonetheless (this is recklessness; - Sansregret v. The Queen, [1985] 1 SCR 570 ). Based on the facts as you''ve presented - in the hypothetical, you may have ruled out the possibility that Alice was reckless. - Although, depending on the time of year, it may be that the sun sets around 9pm, - which may present some awareness of the risk that you have not accounted for in - your hypothetical. Mens rea if specified If the text of the statute does specify - a mens rea then that is what the prosecution needs to show. For example, if one - is prohibited from doing XYZ while "knowing" that it is after 9pm, then - the prosecution will have to demonstrate actual subjective knowledge of the time, - or wilful blindness (which Canadian law takes to impute knowledge: Briscoe). Additional - burdens to make use of some mistakes of fact Some offences put an even higher - burden on the accused in order to rely on a mistake of fact. In sexual offences - where the age of the complainant is relevant (e.g. that they 14 or younger, or - 16 or younger, or 18 or younger), the accused cannot make out a mistake-of-age - defence without showing they took reasonable steps to ascertain the age (see Criminal - Code, s. 150.1).1 Presumptive mens rea for regulatory offences is much lower: - strict liability, subject to a due-diligence defence However, if this were a public-welfare/regulatory - offence, like a provincial traffic law, or a licensing restriction on an aviation - licence, or municipal by-law, there is no mens rea presumption. Rather, public-welfare/regulatory - offences prima facie fall into the category of strict liability offences, subject - only to a due-diligence defence (R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, [1978] 2 SCR 1299). Alice - would have to show that she had a "reasonable belief in facts which, if true, - would have rendered the act innocent". What it means to have a "reasonable - belief in facts" is very fact-specific.2 Alice has to hold the belief herself, - and the trier of fact must accept that a reasonable person would also have held - that belief. Just as in the case for recklessness, I can imagine that the timing - of sunset might pose a problem for a due-diligence defence in your particular - example. Absolute liability If the penalties for the offence do not include the - risk of imprisonment, the offence can even be declared to be an absolute liability - offence, in which due diligence is not even a defence (Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act, - [1985] 2 SCR 486). 1. For example, simply relying on a complainant''s "language - and statements indicating that she could be 14 years of age or older did not constitute - taking reasonable steps or all reasonable steps to ascertain her true age in all - the circumstances, especially after being warned by her mother to stop all contact - or she would call the police and stating that the complainant was way too young - for him" (R. v. Dragos, 2012 ONCA 538). 2. For example, for the sale of alcohol, - "when the individual clearly appears to be underage, ... a duly diligent - permittee would require at least two more pieces of ID confirming that the person - was not a minor, question the individual about the ID, then decide if it is reasonable - to serve the individual alcohol versus the youthful appearance of the individual" - (Citynski Hotels Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, 2003 SKQB 314).' - - 'In principle, the data subject''s right to access involves a copy of all personal - data the controller holds on them. There are no time limits by default. Of course, - the controller can ask a data subject to clarify their request, e.g. to focus - on a particular time frame. There is an implied time limit though: personal data - may only be processed/stored for as long as the data is necessary to achieve the - purposes for which it was collected. Afterwards, it must be deleted. A controller - with good data management will be able to limit their effort by having as short - retention periods as possible for their different records. Furthermore, a lot - of data is not personal data, or falls out of scope of the GDPR because it is - not processed with automated means or forms part of a filing system. For example, - if thousands of old invoices were archived in paper form in boxes that are only - sorted by year, there might be an argument that this isn''t a filing system in - the sense of the GDPR and that a DSAR would not have to involve looking through - all the archived invoices (compare also Art 11). In your scenario, there is a - clear retention period of six years. You are asking for records about how that - data might have been used further in the past. To the degree that such data is - actually available, that could reasonably be personal data and should be included - in a response to a DSAR. E.g. they might have information like this: “File #1234 - was included in a data set that was sold to EvilCorp in 2007. The entries in File - #1234 that are older than 2014 have been purged, so we do not know which entries - were included in the data set. The current name on File #1234 is Dave.” This information - about the sale would be personal data because it relates to you, and you are identifiable. - Of course, the controller might not be set up to perform this search unless specifically - asked. However, more unspecific information might not be personal data. For example: - “About 70% of our files were included in a data set that was sold to EvilCorp - in 2007. We no longer have records indicating whether your file was included.” - Since there is no link between the sale and your personal data, I don''t think - it would have to be included in a DSAR response. The primary reason why you should - be told about sales of personal data is that per Art 15(1)(c), you should be informed - about “the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have - been or will be disclosed” in a DSAR response. So when making a data subject access - request, it could make sense to explicitly referencing this paragraph. So you - would be interested in receiving a copy of your personal data as per Art 15 GDPR, - and in particular any available information per Art 15(1)(c) GDPR about the recipients - or categories of recipients to whom your personal data has been or may have been - disclosed in the past. Quite likely the response will be underwhelming, e.g. by - just giving a broad category such as “potential creditors who are contractually - obligated to use the data only in accordance with our policies”. Whether such - responses are compliant (I don''t necessarily think so) will not be clear until - there''s a good precedent, and that would require that someone sorts this out - in court.' -- source_sentence: 'Q: Can a car insurance company cancel my policy if payments where - made every month , claiming it was for non paymemt?. I was insured by Infinity - and was making installment. Payments on my policy , there was no changes on my - policy… on the 6 month of my policy they billed me for an amount deferent then - my schedule payments , increasing from 340 to 800 and the remaing months lowering - to 240 causing my payment to be declined ' + - A:This is awful. You need to contact the utility immediately to have service restored + in your own name. Deduct from rent what you must pay. Your landlord is prohibited + from doing this to force you out, it is in a statute, I believe Civil Code 1941.6, + or close to it. You need to retain an attorney immediately to get on this LL on + your behalf. Check here and do a google search. You may need to speak with several + before finding one who will assist. Contact your elderly neighbor to see if she + wants to be represented as well. LL are subject to strict provisions about how + to evict tenants, these "heirs" apparently do not appreciate this and think they + can do whatever they want. You are entitled to protection but it won't be quick + or easy. I recommend you contact several attorneys in your area that practice + this type of law, as soon as possible. Thank you for using Justia ask a lawyer. + - A:Even after the Dobbs decision, a woman has the right to choose. A minor woman + would need to work with her parents to obtain a timely abortion. If your girlfriend + chooses to have the baby, keeps the baby, and gives you information, you could + have the option of signing off on the baby's birth certificate to be designated + as the baby's father, or to file a timely declaration of paternity. Use protection/a + condom. Actions have consequences. If your girlfriend has the baby, she can file + a parentage action, seeking a DNA test if you've not voluntarily stepped up. If + you are the dad, you can be held accountable for 18 years of child support, plus + maintaining health insurance for the child, prenatal costs for the mom, costs + of birthing the baby, and splitting out the child's uninsured health care expenses. + Good luck to you. + - A:Under these facts no one is going to jail. If there is no order, there is no + arrears. If there is a pending case, the Court may award arrears, however, the + obligor will have an opportunity to pay back them back over time. Seeing the child + is a separate matter from whether one must pay support. The obligor should contact + an attorney who regularly practices family relations law in whatever county the + child resides, and file a motion to establish paternity, and parental rights and + responsibilities. + - A:Sorry, but your question should be directed to a fanily law or domestic relations + attorney. + - A:Your question involves Delaware law. You would need to contact attorneys in + Delaware for help with this. + - A:I looked online for what you are referencing, and I see a story regarding DeSantis + announcing that the Fla. Dept. of Law Enforcement arrested 20 people who allegedly + voted illegally because their voting rights were not restored, even though they + were allowed to register. (See, for example, https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2022/08/19/desantis-touted-their-arrest-but-ex-felons-say-they-werent-told-they-couldnt-vote/ + ). If all of the arrested individuals have the same story as the lady first mentioned + in the above news article, I'm guessing that they will likely have a good defense + of not having the intent to commit the crime, and hopefully will be found not + guilty or have their cases dismissed. But if you're asking if there's a law that + obligates the governor to inform the public that the arrested individuals have + the defense that they thought their rights were restored, the answer is no. The + government does need to do a much better job of getting the word out regarding + who is qualified to vote after a felony conviction and who is not, and on how + to seek restoration of rights. The government (State or local) should also provide + an instant background check that would allow for the registration office to reject + an application without subjecting the unqualified voter to arrest. Everyone should + talk to their State legislators, local elections officials and/or county/city + commissioners about this issue, as well as talk to private organizations concerned + with voting, such as the ACLU, NAACP, and League of Women Voters. + - A:Your question indicates that your sister is an adult, not a minor (under 18). + In cases when a person has not made an advanced medical directive, then Section + 54.1-2986 of the Virginia Code determines the procedure for making medical decisions + in the absence of an advanced medical directive. The priority for making decisions + starts with guardian, then spouse, then adult child, then parent, then adult sibling. + - A:In California, both parents have rights regarding their child, but these rights + need to be legally recognized and structured, especially in situations where there's + no established custody arrangement. Since paternity has been established and child + support set, the father does have certain legal rights concerning the child. However, + if there's no formal visitation or custody agreement in place, he doesn't have + the automatic right to take the child from you. Normally, custody and visitation + rights are determined through a court order. In the absence of such an order, + you retain physical custody of your child. If the father wishes to be involved + in the child's life, he can request the court to establish a formal visitation + or custody arrangement. This process will involve the court reviewing what's in + the best interest of the child and then making a decision accordingly. It's important + for you to understand your rights and the legal process in such situations. If + you're concerned about custody and visitation issues, it might be advisable to + consult with a family law attorney. They can provide guidance on how to proceed + and represent your interests in any legal actions related to custody and visitation. + Remember, the well-being of your child is paramount, and the court's primary focus + will be on ensuring their best interests are met in any custody or visitation + arrangements. +- source_sentence: how is my info used sentences: - - 'A:So, who knows what they are thinking other than them? It is not clear to me - that THEY contact FCA for you or if you contacted FCA on your own first and then - FCA is responding to your contact or to their''s? That could make a difference. - As a lemon law attorney myself I can tell you a few things: a- It''s rare that - FCA offers a buy back without counsel involved; b- It''s more rare that they would - offer all the law allows; c- one usually gets a better result if one has counsel - involved; d- FCA will often not pay counsel or not pay much, pre-suit and will - be forced by a bad twist in the law, ironically sought out by folks like FCA, - to pay more once a case is filed in court. Your law firm has 23 people on their - website! That''s a huge number of mouths to feed. I hope they give you great service. - In closing, You should ask THEM these same questions! They are you lawyers and - they must answer you honestly.' - - A:Sorry to hear about your accident. The car that started the chain reaction accident - is at fault for all cars damaged including your property damage and personal injuries. - However, if your car is declared a total loss and your remaining car loan is greater - than the present market value of your car, you will be responsible for the (excess - loan over your car's value) unless you have gap insurance for your car. For further - information, contact my office at (240)676-4827. Thank you. - - A:Under California law, an insurance company typically cannot cancel a policy - for non-payment if payments were made consistently and in accordance with the - agreed-upon payment schedule. If you have evidence of regular payments and your - policy was canceled erroneously, you may have grounds to challenge the cancellation - and seek reinstatement of your policy. It's advisable to contact the insurance - company and, if necessary, consult with an attorney who can help you address the - situation. - - 'Whether you''re taking a vacation or using a loaner vehicle from your regular - car''s repair shop, you''ll need to procure some form of car insurance for your - rental car. Unfortunately, your auto insurance provider may not provide much direction - on this matter. In general, American auto insurers provide surprisingly little - rental-related guidance to their policyholders. For folks who regularly use rental - cars, this can be downright frustrating. Before you go on a trip or agree to accept - a rental car from an auto-repair shop, be sure to talk to your insurance company - about your coverage options. If you regularly travel on business, it''s likely - that your employer will pick up the tab for your rental car. If this is the case, - you''ll need to procure vehicle insurance through your rental car company. Unless - the company for which you work is particularly generous with its business travelers, - it probably won''t pay to insure your rental vehicle. Unfortunately, few personal - auto insurance policies provide coverage for vehicles that their policyholders - don''t rent on their own. As such, the fact that your employer is paying for your - rental car may make it difficult for you to obtain full coverage on it. While - you''ll still be protected against injury-related lawsuits and property damage - claims through your rental car company''s own insurer, you''ll be held personally - liable for any damage that you cause to the vehicle. This loophole has caught - many business travelers by surprise. In order to circumvent it, you''ll need to - purchase supplemental vehicle insurance from your rental car company. This could - add a significant premium to the total cost of your rental. If you''re traveling - for pleasure or renting a car in another capacity, this consideration will be - irrelevant. However, you may still need to purchase supplemental insurance from - your rental car company. Although there''s no hard-and-fast way to determine whether - your auto insurance policy covers you in the event of a rental-car accident, you - should still read your policy closely. It may explicitly state that it covers - rented or "non-owned" cars. If this is the case, you should feel free to file - an insurance claim for your rental car. On the other hand, your policy might not - say anything about "non-owned" vehicles. If this is the case, you should assume - that your rented vehicles aren''t covered by your policy. If you get into an accident - while driving a rental car, you may need to pay for its repair costs out of your - own pocket. ' - - A:What does your mortgage say? IF it says they can randomly require you pay for - inspections, then yes, they can do what you describe. If it says they can force - you to pay for inspections whenever work is done on the property that too is something - they can do. If it doesn't say that, it's open to interpretation. Is $60 worth - suing them and paying thousands of dollars in attorney's fees over? Maybe the - BEST course of action is to pay off the loan and stop giving them any income. - It seems like you should be able to get a personal loan or use your savings to - pay off the final 2 years of principal balance and not dealing with companies - that want to make your life difficult is probably a good thing for other reasons - too! Remember, you're complaining about $60. How much effort do you want to put - into this? Just pay off the loan and TELL THEM WHY you're no longer doing business - with them. - - A:A North Carolina attorney could advise best, but your question remains open - for a week. The insurance company has a reasonable argument they provided a rental - and that that rental companies do charge deposits - the amount can vary by company. - The court may see them favorably in light of this - but other attorneys could - see it differently. You could consult with an attorney if it is worth pursuing, - either through a law firm or on your own. Good luck - - A:A Texas attorney could advise best, but your question remains open for a week. - That sounds like fraud. You could consult with local attorneys to ask how it is - treated under state-specific laws. Good luck - - 'If you''re going through a messy divorce in California, you''re probably wondering - whether you''ll be able to keep your health insurance coverage after its finalization. - After all, health insurance is tremendously expensive. If you''re unable to remain - covered under your ex-spouse''s employer-sponsored health insurance plan, you - might need to source health insurance coverage on the open market. Depending upon - your health profile and the needs of your children, this may cost a substantial - amount of money. Before you search for a new health insurance plan, you''ll want - to check with a seasoned divorce lawyer or health insurance expert to make sure - that you''re not eligible to remain covered. In fact, there are certain circumstances - under which you might be able to retain your ex-spouse''s health insurance coverage. - Under the applicable state and federal statutes, this "continuation of coverage" - is liable to be temporary. However, many divorces result in an arrangement that - requires the insured ex-spouse to issue regular cash payments to the uninsured - ex-spouse in lieu of providing health insurance coverage indefinitely. Alternatively, - the insured spouse may be compelled to set up and pay for a health insurance plan - that covers the uninsured ex-spouse in perpetuity. If the uninsured ex-spouse - remains the custodial parent after the divorce''s finalization, this plan will - almost certainly cover his or her children as well. In other words, California - law makes it likely that you''ll be able to retain health insurance coverage after - your divorce. However, the process of establishing and paying for such coverage - can be extremely tricky. For this reason, many Californian divorce lawyers advise - their clients to initiate legal separation proceedings at least one year before - beginning divorce proceedings. Once a legal separation order has been handed down, - it''s far easier for two partners to work out the continuation of health insurance - benefits on equal footing. Once the separation is official, you''ll need to determine - whether you''ll be eligible for federal COBRA coverage. COBRA permits certain - qualifying ex-spouses to remain covered by their former partners'' health insurance - plans for up to 18 months from the date of their divorce. However, COBRA benefits - are subject to numerous limitations. They may also be far more expensive than - the benefits that they replace. If you''re not sure whether opting for COBRA coverage - is a good idea, you should talk to your divorce lawyer. It''s possible that he - or she may be able to work out a deal that requires your ex-spouse to pay for - a portion of your COBRA benefits. ' + - Provide personalized experiences + - ' In order to make your visits to our website and use of the services available + on or through our website as worthwhile as possible, Pepperplate may also collect + Personal Information about its visitors, but only when a visitor provides such + Personal Information to us in the process of ordering subscriptions, entering + contests or sweepstakes, signing up for our newsletter(s), using our "Feedback" + feature, registering with the website or using other services available on or + through our Website.' + - technical information, including the Internet protocol (IP) address used to connect + your computer to the Internet, your login information (when you sign in as a customer), + browser type and version, and the type of device used to access the Platform; + information about your visit, including the clickstream to, through and from our + Platform (including date and time), products you viewed or searched for, page + response times, length of visits to certain pages, page interaction information + (such as scrolling, clicks, and mouse-overs), and any phone number used to call + our customer service number. + - Such information will also be used, for example, to process your orders, respond + to your requests and inquiries and provide you with the services and features + offered on or through our Website. + - How Long Do We Retain Your Personal Data? + - If you choose to provide such information, during registration or otherwise, Khan + Academy will treat the information as Personal Information and will use it in + the ways described in this Privacy Policy. + - For example, we use HTTPS while information is being transmitted. + - You may request details of personal information which we hold about you under + the Data Protection Act 1998. +- source_sentence: what kind of data will tastemade collect? + sentences: + - See Cookies and other technologies for more information on the use of cookies + and device identifiers related to the Services. + - ' profiling activity - purpose under par.' + - demographic information such as country, language, operating system and postcode + - For example, we may collect anonymous aggregated information about how users use + our services. + - to make suggestions and recommendations to you and other users of our Platform + about goods or services that may interest you or them. + - We will also collect your usage information of relevant apps on your mobile phone, + so that we can optimize the use experience of TouchPal Keyboard. + - What Choices and Access Do I Have? + - We will collect your SMS and the content published on Twitter and Facebook for + customized prediction, and we just collect such information or content for learning + purpose and it will not be uploaded to our server. datasets: - sentence-transformers/coliee - bwang0911/legal_qa_v1 @@ -450,19 +321,298 @@ datasets: - bwang0911/aus_legal_qa pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity library_name: sentence-transformers +metrics: +- cosine_accuracy@1 +- cosine_accuracy@3 +- cosine_accuracy@5 +- cosine_accuracy@10 +- cosine_precision@1 +- cosine_precision@3 +- cosine_precision@5 +- cosine_precision@10 +- cosine_recall@1 +- cosine_recall@3 +- cosine_recall@5 +- cosine_recall@10 +- cosine_ndcg@10 +- cosine_mrr@10 +- cosine_map@100 +model-index: +- name: SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 + results: + - task: + type: information-retrieval + name: Information Retrieval + dataset: + name: mteb/AILA casedocs + type: mteb/AILA_casedocs + metrics: + - type: cosine_accuracy@1 + value: 0.22 + name: Cosine Accuracy@1 + - type: cosine_accuracy@3 + value: 0.32 + name: Cosine Accuracy@3 + - type: cosine_accuracy@5 + value: 0.38 + name: Cosine Accuracy@5 + - type: cosine_accuracy@10 + value: 0.52 + name: Cosine Accuracy@10 + - type: cosine_precision@1 + value: 0.22 + name: Cosine Precision@1 + - type: cosine_precision@3 + value: 0.18 + name: Cosine Precision@3 + - type: cosine_precision@5 + value: 0.14 + name: Cosine Precision@5 + - type: cosine_precision@10 + value: 0.102 + name: Cosine Precision@10 + - type: cosine_recall@1 + value: 0.06278088578088578 + name: Cosine Recall@1 + - type: cosine_recall@3 + value: 0.16231934731934733 + name: Cosine Recall@3 + - type: cosine_recall@5 + value: 0.1968951048951049 + name: Cosine Recall@5 + - type: cosine_recall@10 + value: 0.2871608391608392 + name: Cosine Recall@10 + - type: cosine_ndcg@10 + value: 0.2401570635084822 + name: Cosine Ndcg@10 + - type: cosine_mrr@10 + value: 0.29976984126984124 + name: Cosine Mrr@10 + - type: cosine_map@100 + value: 0.21500479010135787 + name: Cosine Map@100 + - task: + type: information-retrieval + name: Information Retrieval + dataset: + name: mteb/AILA statutes + type: mteb/AILA_statutes + metrics: + - type: cosine_accuracy@1 + value: 0.26 + name: Cosine Accuracy@1 + - type: cosine_accuracy@3 + value: 0.52 + name: Cosine Accuracy@3 + - type: cosine_accuracy@5 + value: 0.56 + name: Cosine Accuracy@5 + - type: cosine_accuracy@10 + value: 0.78 + name: Cosine Accuracy@10 + - type: cosine_precision@1 + value: 0.26 + name: Cosine Precision@1 + - type: cosine_precision@3 + value: 0.2 + name: Cosine Precision@3 + - type: cosine_precision@5 + value: 0.15200000000000002 + name: Cosine Precision@5 + - type: cosine_precision@10 + value: 0.132 + name: Cosine Precision@10 + - type: cosine_recall@1 + value: 0.066 + name: Cosine Recall@1 + - type: cosine_recall@3 + value: 0.15100000000000002 + name: Cosine Recall@3 + - type: cosine_recall@5 + value: 0.187 + name: Cosine Recall@5 + - type: cosine_recall@10 + value: 0.3096666666666667 + name: Cosine Recall@10 + - type: cosine_ndcg@10 + value: 0.26445384560452256 + name: Cosine Ndcg@10 + - type: cosine_mrr@10 + value: 0.40640476190476194 + name: Cosine Mrr@10 + - type: cosine_map@100 + value: 0.22270227651626964 + name: Cosine Map@100 + - task: + type: information-retrieval + name: Information Retrieval + dataset: + name: mteb/legalbench consumer contracts qa + type: mteb/legalbench_consumer_contracts_qa + metrics: + - type: cosine_accuracy@1 + value: 0.4393939393939394 + name: Cosine Accuracy@1 + - type: cosine_accuracy@3 + value: 0.6616161616161617 + name: Cosine Accuracy@3 + - type: cosine_accuracy@5 + value: 0.7626262626262627 + name: Cosine Accuracy@5 + - type: cosine_accuracy@10 + value: 0.8611111111111112 + name: Cosine Accuracy@10 + - type: cosine_precision@1 + value: 0.4393939393939394 + name: Cosine Precision@1 + - type: cosine_precision@3 + value: 0.22053872053872056 + name: Cosine Precision@3 + - type: cosine_precision@5 + value: 0.1525252525252525 + name: Cosine Precision@5 + - type: cosine_precision@10 + value: 0.0861111111111111 + name: Cosine Precision@10 + - type: cosine_recall@1 + value: 0.4393939393939394 + name: Cosine Recall@1 + - type: cosine_recall@3 + value: 0.6616161616161617 + name: Cosine Recall@3 + - type: cosine_recall@5 + value: 0.7626262626262627 + name: Cosine Recall@5 + - type: cosine_recall@10 + value: 0.8611111111111112 + name: Cosine Recall@10 + - type: cosine_ndcg@10 + value: 0.6446558121791953 + name: Cosine Ndcg@10 + - type: cosine_mrr@10 + value: 0.5759569905403237 + name: Cosine Mrr@10 + - type: cosine_map@100 + value: 0.5822763318784706 + name: Cosine Map@100 + - task: + type: information-retrieval + name: Information Retrieval + dataset: + name: mteb/legalbench corporate lobbying + type: mteb/legalbench_corporate_lobbying + metrics: + - type: cosine_accuracy@1 + value: 0.711764705882353 + name: Cosine Accuracy@1 + - type: cosine_accuracy@3 + value: 0.8705882352941177 + name: Cosine Accuracy@3 + - type: cosine_accuracy@5 + value: 0.9088235294117647 + name: Cosine Accuracy@5 + - type: cosine_accuracy@10 + value: 0.9470588235294117 + name: Cosine Accuracy@10 + - type: cosine_precision@1 + value: 0.711764705882353 + name: Cosine Precision@1 + - type: cosine_precision@3 + value: 0.2901960784313726 + name: Cosine Precision@3 + - type: cosine_precision@5 + value: 0.1817647058823529 + name: Cosine Precision@5 + - type: cosine_precision@10 + value: 0.09470588235294117 + name: Cosine Precision@10 + - type: cosine_recall@1 + value: 0.711764705882353 + name: Cosine Recall@1 + - type: cosine_recall@3 + value: 0.8705882352941177 + name: Cosine Recall@3 + - type: cosine_recall@5 + value: 0.9088235294117647 + name: Cosine Recall@5 + - type: cosine_recall@10 + value: 0.9470588235294117 + name: Cosine Recall@10 + - type: cosine_ndcg@10 + value: 0.8320806842083546 + name: Cosine Ndcg@10 + - type: cosine_mrr@10 + value: 0.79484243697479 + name: Cosine Mrr@10 + - type: cosine_map@100 + value: 0.7971232314431899 + name: Cosine Map@100 + - task: + type: information-retrieval + name: Information Retrieval + dataset: + name: mteb/legal summarization + type: mteb/legal_summarization + metrics: + - type: cosine_accuracy@1 + value: 0.4788732394366197 + name: Cosine Accuracy@1 + - type: cosine_accuracy@3 + value: 0.6338028169014085 + name: Cosine Accuracy@3 + - type: cosine_accuracy@5 + value: 0.676056338028169 + name: Cosine Accuracy@5 + - type: cosine_accuracy@10 + value: 0.7676056338028169 + name: Cosine Accuracy@10 + - type: cosine_precision@1 + value: 0.4788732394366197 + name: Cosine Precision@1 + - type: cosine_precision@3 + value: 0.22887323943661966 + name: Cosine Precision@3 + - type: cosine_precision@5 + value: 0.15492957746478872 + name: Cosine Precision@5 + - type: cosine_precision@10 + value: 0.09542253521126762 + name: Cosine Precision@10 + - type: cosine_recall@1 + value: 0.42582045302115723 + name: Cosine Recall@1 + - type: cosine_recall@3 + value: 0.5613769739650022 + name: Cosine Recall@3 + - type: cosine_recall@5 + value: 0.6038934363758307 + name: Cosine Recall@5 + - type: cosine_recall@10 + value: 0.7029716175842936 + name: Cosine Recall@10 + - type: cosine_ndcg@10 + value: 0.5814202795676716 + name: Cosine Ndcg@10 + - type: cosine_mrr@10 + value: 0.5694011289961997 + name: Cosine Mrr@10 + - type: cosine_map@100 + value: 0.5410978538558904 + name: Cosine Map@100 --- -# SentenceTransformer based on jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en +# SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 -This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en](https://huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en) on the [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee), [legal_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_qa_v1), [law_stack](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/law_stackexchange), [legal_lens](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_lens_nli), [cuad_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/cuad_qa), [privacy_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/privacy_qa), [legal_sum](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_case_summarization) and [aus_legal_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/aus_legal_qa) datasets. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 512-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more. +This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) on the [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee), [legal_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_qa_v1), [law_stack](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/law_stackexchange), [legal_lens](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_lens_nli), [cuad_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/cuad_qa), [privacy_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/privacy_qa), [legal_sum](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/legal_case_summarization) and [aus_legal_qa](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bwang0911/aus_legal_qa) datasets. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 384-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more. ## Model Details ### Model Description - **Model Type:** Sentence Transformer -- **Base model:** [jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en](https://huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-small-en) -- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 512 tokens -- **Output Dimensionality:** 512 dimensions +- **Base model:** [sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) +- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 256 tokens +- **Output Dimensionality:** 384 dimensions - **Similarity Function:** Cosine Similarity - **Training Datasets:** - [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee) @@ -486,8 +636,9 @@ This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [j ``` SentenceTransformer( - (0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: JinaBertModel - (1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 512, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True}) + (0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 256, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel + (1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 384, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True}) + (2): Normalize() ) ``` @@ -509,13 +660,13 @@ from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer model = SentenceTransformer("bwang0911/jev2-legal") # Run inference sentences = [ - 'Q: Can a car insurance company cancel my policy if payments where made every month , claiming it was for non paymemt?. I was insured by Infinity and was making installment. Payments on my policy , there was no changes on my policy… on the 6 month of my policy they billed me for an amount deferent then my schedule payments , increasing from 340 to 800 and the remaing months lowering to 240 causing my payment to be declined ', - "A:Under California law, an insurance company typically cannot cancel a policy for non-payment if payments were made consistently and in accordance with the agreed-upon payment schedule. If you have evidence of regular payments and your policy was canceled erroneously, you may have grounds to challenge the cancellation and seek reinstatement of your policy. It's advisable to contact the insurance company and, if necessary, consult with an attorney who can help you address the situation.", - 'A:A North Carolina attorney could advise best, but your question remains open for a week. The insurance company has a reasonable argument they provided a rental and that that rental companies do charge deposits - the amount can vary by company. The court may see them favorably in light of this - but other attorneys could see it differently. You could consult with an attorney if it is worth pursuing, either through a law firm or on your own. Good luck', + 'what kind of data will tastemade collect?', + 'See Cookies and other technologies for more information on the use of cookies and device identifiers related to the Services.', + 'to make suggestions and recommendations to you and other users of our Platform about goods or services that may interest you or them.', ] embeddings = model.encode(sentences) print(embeddings.shape) -# [3, 512] +# [3, 384] # Get the similarity scores for the embeddings similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings) @@ -547,6 +698,33 @@ You can finetune this model on your own dataset. *List how the model may foreseeably be misused and address what users ought not to do with the model.* --> +## Evaluation + +### Metrics + +#### Information Retrieval + +* Datasets: `mteb/AILA_casedocs`, `mteb/AILA_statutes`, `mteb/legalbench_consumer_contracts_qa`, `mteb/legalbench_corporate_lobbying` and `mteb/legal_summarization` +* Evaluated with [InformationRetrievalEvaluator](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/evaluation.html#sentence_transformers.evaluation.InformationRetrievalEvaluator) + +| Metric | mteb/AILA_casedocs | mteb/AILA_statutes | mteb/legalbench_consumer_contracts_qa | mteb/legalbench_corporate_lobbying | mteb/legal_summarization | +|:--------------------|:-------------------|:-------------------|:--------------------------------------|:-----------------------------------|:-------------------------| +| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.4394 | 0.7118 | 0.4789 | +| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 0.6616 | 0.8706 | 0.6338 | +| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.7626 | 0.9088 | 0.6761 | +| cosine_accuracy@10 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 0.8611 | 0.9471 | 0.7676 | +| cosine_precision@1 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.4394 | 0.7118 | 0.4789 | +| cosine_precision@3 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.2205 | 0.2902 | 0.2289 | +| cosine_precision@5 | 0.14 | 0.152 | 0.1525 | 0.1818 | 0.1549 | +| cosine_precision@10 | 0.102 | 0.132 | 0.0861 | 0.0947 | 0.0954 | +| cosine_recall@1 | 0.0628 | 0.066 | 0.4394 | 0.7118 | 0.4258 | +| cosine_recall@3 | 0.1623 | 0.151 | 0.6616 | 0.8706 | 0.5614 | +| cosine_recall@5 | 0.1969 | 0.187 | 0.7626 | 0.9088 | 0.6039 | +| cosine_recall@10 | 0.2872 | 0.3097 | 0.8611 | 0.9471 | 0.703 | +| **cosine_ndcg@10** | **0.2402** | **0.2645** | **0.6447** | **0.8321** | **0.5814** | +| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.2998 | 0.4064 | 0.576 | 0.7948 | 0.5694 | +| cosine_map@100 | 0.215 | 0.2227 | 0.5823 | 0.7971 | 0.5411 | +