🦸🏻#2: Your Go-To Vocabulary to Navigate the World of AI Agents and Agentic Workflows
Intro
In the first installment of our AI Agents series, we dove deep into the fascinating topic of open-endedness, which is highly relevant to the development of autonomous agents.
While we’ve explored that core concept, we haven’t yet tackled the many definitions surrounding AI agents or the misconceptions that come with them. Some call them "bots," others "agents," and there are even more terms in use. Is this okay? Yes and no. To truly make sense of the pivotal changes AI agents are bringing, and to effectively communicate about building systems around and with them, we need to understand why these differences matter. Grouping similar concepts together will help us feel more comfortable with the language, clarify distinctions, and address common misconceptions. Think of this as your go-to vocabulary for navigating the complex world of AI agents and workflows!
In today’s episode:
- Core Agentic Concepts
- What are Autonomous, Intelligent, and Rational Agents? Core Types
- What are Task-Oriented, Smart, Simple Agents, and Bots? Varying Levels of Complexity
- Agentic Interactions and Interfaces: Human-AI Interaction
- Embodied and Digital Agents: Operating in Different Environments
- Advanced and Specialized Agents (it’s mostly still in the future)
- Roadmap for these advanced agents
- From Bots to Advanced Agents to Agentic Workflows – the paradigm shift
- Conclusion
If you want to receive our articles straight to your inbox, please subscribe here
Core Agentic Concepts
The term "AI agent" serves as the central concept – an umbrella term – that unifies the entire discussion of agentic behavior and functionality in AI systems. At the heart of AI agents are the ideas of autonomy, perception, decision-making, and action, which manifest differently depending on the complexity and purpose of the agent. To implement these capabilities effectively, AI agents rely on key modules: profiling, which assigns roles to guide behavior; memory, allowing agents to retain and reuse information; knowledge, enabling them to start with domain-specific expertise; reasoning/planning, to break down tasks and orchestrate steps; and actions, which integrate external tools to achieve their goals.
These components (which we will expand on in the upcoming episodes) form the building blocks for creating capable and intelligent autonomous agents. This leads us to the concepts of Autonomous, Intelligent, and Rational Agents.
What are Autonomous, Intelligent, and Rational Agents? Core Types
Autonomous agents are entities that operate independently of human oversight. They continuously perceive their environment, make decisions based on internal rules or learned experiences, and take actions to achieve specific goals. These agents form the broad category encompassing all types of AI agents, from simple rule-based systems to more advanced ones that learn and adapt.
Key Terms:
- Environment: The space in which the agent operates, such as the physical world (for robots and drones) or a digital space (for trading algorithms and game AI agents).
- Policy: The internal rules or learned behaviors guiding the agent’s decisions.
- Reward: Feedback (positive or negative) received by the agent, which informs its future actions.
Intelligent agents are a specialized subset of autonomous agents. They differentiate themselves by incorporating learning and adaptation into their decision-making processes, enabling them to improve performance over time. Intelligent agents use data to refine their actions, allowing them to solve novel or complex problems that require more than rigid, rule-based approaches.
Rational agents take decision-making a step further by aiming to maximize utility – making decisions designed to achieve the best possible outcome based on the information available to them. These agents are not just autonomous or intelligent; they are focused on optimizing their decisions in a given environment, often under conditions of uncertainty. Rational agents are frequently used in simulations, economic models, or high-stakes scenarios where consistently optimal decision-making is critical.
Misconception: While all intelligent agents are autonomous, not all autonomous agents are intelligent. Some operate based on pre-defined, rigid rules without learning or adapting. Similarly, not all intelligent agents are rational – an agent may learn and adapt but still not make the most optimal decisions due to imperfect information or computational constraints. Rational agents strive to make the best decisions within the limits of their knowledge and capabilities.
What are Task-Oriented, Smart, Simple Agents, and Bots? Varying Levels of Complexity
These categories represent different expressions of autonomous agents. Simple and task-oriented agents act within predefined boundaries, while smart agents incorporate limited adaptability, bringing them closer to intelligent agents in terms of functionality.
- Task-oriented agents focus on completing specific tasks efficiently. They follow strict programming and are often used to automate routine processes like scheduling, customer support, or workflow automation. These agents do not require significant learning or adaptation beyond their core function.
- Bots are a type of task-oriented agent designed to perform repetitive tasks based on predefined rules. They are commonly used in customer service, social media management, and automation. While bots are autonomous, they typically don’t learn or adapt beyond their initial programming, which limits their flexibility compared to more advanced AI agents.
- Smart agents share similarities with task-oriented agents but operate in dynamic environments where adaptability and learning are necessary. For example, a smart agent might control traffic lights, adjusting based on patterns to optimize flow. Smart agents are more capable than task-oriented agents because they can adjust based on feedback from the environment.
- Simple agents represent the most basic form of AI agents. These agents follow straightforward rules without the ability to adapt or learn. A robot vacuum cleaner, for instance, may navigate based on fixed commands. Simple agents are effective for straightforward tasks but lack the complexity required for more dynamic environments.
Misconception: Not all AI agents need to learn or adapt. Simple agents and bots perform useful tasks without requiring sophisticated learning mechanisms, but they lack the flexibility and autonomy of more advanced agents.
Additionally, AI agents and bots are often used interchangeably, but this is misleading. While both can operate autonomously, bots are typically limited to rule-based, repetitive tasks. An AI agent encapsulates much more. A bot is a type of AI agent, but not all AI agents are bots.
Agentic Interactions and Interfaces: Human-AI Interaction
Some AI agents are designed specifically to interact with humans, augmenting their abilities or managing tasks in virtual environments.
AI Assistants, Copilots, and AI Personas
- AI assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant are multipurpose task-oriented agents designed to help users complete tasks like setting reminders or providing information. They interact via voice or text, streamlining daily workflows.
- Copilots are specialized agents designed to augment human capabilities by assisting with specific tasks. For instance, GitHub Copilot helps developers by suggesting code snippets, making it more specialized than general assistants. While AI assistants perform a wide array of tasks, copilots are focused on enhancing particular workflows.
- AI personas take on specific identities or roles when interacting with humans. These agents mimic human-like characteristics to create more engaging or relatable interactions, such as virtual assistants with distinct personalities used in customer service.
Misconception: AI assistants and copilots are often viewed as the same, but copilots tend to be more specialized for particular domains, whereas assistants are broader and more general-purpose.
Embodied and Digital Agents: Operating in Different Environments
Embodied agents are AI agents with physical form, such as robots or drones. These agents interact with the physical world by perceiving and acting on their surroundings. Examples include robotic arms in manufacturing or autonomous delivery drones.
Digital agents exist solely in virtual environments, performing tasks like customer service, digital content moderation, or managing online systems. Unlike embodied agents, they do not have a physical presence but are equally capable of influencing their digital environments.
Key Terms:
- Autonomy: Embodied agents often operate with high levels of autonomy, using sensors and actuators to interact with the physical world.
- Perception: Both embodied and digital agents use sensors (physical or digital) to gather data from their environments.
Misconception: The sophistication of an agent is determined more by its task requirements than by its form (physical or digital).
Advanced and Specialized Agents (it’s mostly still in the future)
Some agents are designed to be more versatile, capable of operating across various environments or replicating themselves to solve distributed problems.
- Multi-Framework agents are designed to operate across multiple platforms or environments, integrating seamlessly with different systems. This versatility makes them particularly valuable in enterprise settings, where workflows span various technologies.
- Self-Replicating agents are theoretical agents capable of creating copies of themselves. These agents could be used in decentralized networks to replicate across nodes, solving large-scale distributed problems.
- Polymorphic agents can change their form or functionality based on the task or environment they encounter. For instance, an agent may shift from being a data processing assistant to a project management tool, depending on user needs. This adaptability makes them highly flexible.
The roadmap for these advanced agents
- Simple Agents - now (2024);
- Intelligent Agents - 3 to 6 months (beginning of 2025);
- Multi-Framework Agents - 6 to 9 months (Q2-Q3 of 2025);
- Self-Replicating Agents - 1 year (the end of 2025);
- Polymorphic-Agents - 18 months to 2 years (2026).
These agents and the roadmap for them were suggested by John Thompson, a Global AI leader at EY and serial author of books on AI and data, during our discussion of the AI Agents series.
From Bots to Advanced Agents to Agentic Workflows
Many people are still talking about building bots or agents in isolation, but given the current advancements in AI, it's becoming clear that a more systematic approach is needed: building agentic workflows. Instead of focusing solely on individual agents handling single tasks, it's more productive to consider how these agents can work together, autonomously managing broader processes.
Advanced and specialized agents, such as Multi-framework agents or theoretical Self-replicating agents, serve as building blocks for these workflows. But they're just a part of the bigger picture. The true potential of agentic workflows lies in how these agents can be integrated and orchestrated to manage complex tasks in a dynamic environment.
While we are still in the early stages, the current progress – such as agents that can adapt or replicate across systems – offers a promising path forward. These developments are paving the way for more comprehensive workflows, where AI agents could operate more independently and handle increasingly complex challenges. It’s less about isolated bots now and more about creating interconnected systems that fully leverage AI's growing capabilities.
Conclusion
By organizing these terms into logical groups and clarifying their meanings, this episode provides a clearer understanding of how different AI agents function and what distinguishes them. As AI continues to evolve, understanding the full range of AI agents – from simple bots to advanced intelligent systems – is becoming increasingly important. Clear definitions of these categories will enable us to create smarter, more interconnected systems that work together seamlessly. The shift from standalone agents to collaborative, agent-driven workflows marks a significant leap in how we approach AI. With advancements like multi-framework and polymorphic agents on the horizon, embracing these innovations will unlock exciting possibilities across various industries and aspects of life. If you are buliding an agentic workflow – stay tuned for the next episodes!
You can subscribe to our newsletter here.