Update README.md

README.md

@@ -12,57 +12,102 @@ tags:
 - loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
 base_model: nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base
 widget:
-- source_sentence: "this information about the two documents withheld in part under\
-    \ the deliberative-process \n128 \n \nprivilege in No. 11-444, see First Lutz\
-    \ Decl. Ex. DD at 17, 141, but the descriptions of the \ndecisionmaking authority\
-    \ are generic, stating that the withheld information is a “recommendation \nfrom\
-    \ the [FOIA] analyst to his/her supervisor,” id. at 17, and a “recommendation\
-    \ from the"
+- source_sentence: >-
+    this information about the two documents withheld in part under the
+    deliberative-process 
+
+    128 
+     
+    privilege in No. 11-444, see First Lutz Decl. Ex. DD at 17, 141, but the
+    descriptions of the 
+
+    decisionmaking authority are generic, stating that the withheld information
+    is a “recommendation 
+
+    from the [FOIA] analyst to his/her supervisor,” id. at 17, and a
+    “recommendation from the
   sentences:
   - What did the plaintiff assert about the CIA's inaccurate representations?
-  - What type of document is mentioned as an exhibit in conjunction with the withheld
-    documents?
-  - ¿Qué ámbito jurisdiccional es mencionado en el contexto de derechos sobre la propia
-    imagen?
-- source_sentence: "Artificial Intelligence, Corp. y que prestaba servicios mediante\
-    \ \ncontrato para el Departamento de Producción de tal corporación. \nAdujo que,\
-    \ no se encontraba en la obligación de solicitar \nautorización a la parte apelada\
-    \ para utilizar su imagen, ya que se le \nhabía pagado por la producción de múltiples\
-    \ videos publicitarios \npara el uso de las empresas.  \nLuego \nde \nvarias \n\
-    incidencias"
+  - >-
+    What type of document is mentioned as an exhibit in conjunction with the
+    withheld documents?
+  - >-
+    ¿Qué ámbito jurisdiccional es mencionado en el contexto de derechos sobre la
+    propia imagen?
+- source_sentence: |-
+    Artificial Intelligence, Corp. y que prestaba servicios mediante 
+    contrato para el Departamento de Producción de tal corporación. 
+    Adujo que, no se encontraba en la obligación de solicitar 
+    autorización a la parte apelada para utilizar su imagen, ya que se le 
+    había pagado por la producción de múltiples videos publicitarios 
+    para el uso de las empresas.  
+    Luego 
+    de 
+    varias 
+    incidencias
   sentences:
   - Who has the burden to provide a sufficient record on appeal?
-  - ¿Para qué departamento prestaba servicios Artificial Intelligence, Corp. según
-    el contrato?
+  - >-
+    ¿Para qué departamento prestaba servicios Artificial Intelligence, Corp.
+    según el contrato?
   - What section numbers are referenced for further information?
-- source_sentence: "submission by protégé firms.  SHS MJAR at 28–30; VCH MJAR at 28–30\
-    \ (same).  This, Plaintiffs \ncontend, violates Section 125.8(e) because it purportedly\
-    \ subjects protégés to heightened \nevaluation criteria as compared to offerors\
-    \ generally and makes it harder for mentor-protégé JVs \nto compete against more\
-    \ experienced firms with larger portfolios of past work.  SHS MJAR at 28–"
+- source_sentence: >-
+    submission by protégé firms.  SHS MJAR at 28–30; VCH MJAR at 28–30 (same). 
+    This, Plaintiffs 
+
+    contend, violates Section 125.8(e) because it purportedly subjects protégés
+    to heightened 
+
+    evaluation criteria as compared to offerors generally and makes it harder
+    for mentor-protégé JVs 
+
+    to compete against more experienced firms with larger portfolios of past
+    work.  SHS MJAR at 28–
   sentences:
-  - On what date were the plaintiff's petition, complaint, and trial court's order
-    filed?
+  - >-
+    On what date were the plaintiff's petition, complaint, and trial court's
+    order filed?
   - What section do Plaintiffs contend is violated?
   - What is the amount of pages the party seeks to withhold?
-- source_sentence: "Beginning with the CIA’s submissions, the CIA states in its declaration\
-    \ submitted in No. \n11-445 that “[s]ome of the records for which information\
-    \ has been withheld pursuant to \nExemption (b)(5) contain confidential communications\
-    \ between CIA staff and attorneys within \nthe CIA’s Office of General Counsel\
-    \ about the processing of certain FOIA requests.”  Third Lutz"
+- source_sentence: >-
+    Beginning with the CIA’s submissions, the CIA states in its declaration
+    submitted in No. 
+
+    11-445 that “[s]ome of the records for which information has been withheld
+    pursuant to 
+
+    Exemption (b)(5) contain confidential communications between CIA staff and
+    attorneys within 
+
+    the CIA’s Office of General Counsel about the processing of certain FOIA
+    requests.”  Third Lutz
   sentences:
-  - What is the subject of the confidential communications mentioned in the document?
-  - Which rule number is associated with the responsibilities regarding nonlawyer
-    assistants?
+  - >-
+    What is the subject of the confidential communications mentioned in the
+    document?
+  - >-
+    Which rule number is associated with the responsibilities regarding
+    nonlawyer assistants?
   - ¿Qué número de referencia tiene el documento?
-- source_sentence: "contracting/contracting-assistance-programs/sba-mentor-protege-program\
-    \ (last visited Apr. 19, \n2023). \n5 \n \nprotégé must demonstrate that the added\
-    \ mentor-protégé relationship will not adversely affect the \ndevelopment of either\
-    \ protégé firm (e.g., the second firm may not be a competitor of the first \n\
-    firm).”  13 C.F.R. § 125.9(b)(3)."
+- source_sentence: >-
+    contracting/contracting-assistance-programs/sba-mentor-protege-program (last
+    visited Apr. 19, 
+
+    2023). 
+
+    5 
+     
+    protégé must demonstrate that the added mentor-protégé relationship will not
+    adversely affect the 
+
+    development of either protégé firm (e.g., the second firm may not be a
+    competitor of the first 
+
+    firm).”  13 C.F.R. § 125.9(b)(3).
   sentences:
-  - What discretion do district courts have regarding a defendant’s invocation of
-    FOIA exemptions?
+  - >-
+    What discretion do district courts have regarding a defendant’s invocation
+    of FOIA exemptions?
   - What must the protégé demonstrate about the mentor-protégé relationship?
   - Which exemptions are mentioned in relation to the plaintiff's accusations?
 pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
@@ -346,6 +391,8 @@ model-index:
     - type: cosine_map@100
       value: 0.3939277813526489
       name: Cosine Map@100
+datasets:
+- AdamLucek/legal-rag-positives-synthetic
 ---
 
 # ModernBERT Embed base Legal Matryoshka